On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:06, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:03, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Install Phase IV if you want to retain your sanity.
I'll go do that once I find where I dumped the install discs...
]
Hobbyist ISO + offical ISOs for AXP can be found here: http://rhesus.sampsa.com/medialib.start.html
Use the main site, the mirror isn't ready.
Okay. I'll go grab it there. Was just seeing if I had it laying around so I could save on a download. ;)
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:06, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Further, most VMS clusters are built with machines in the same
datacenter. It's not generally a wide-area thing.
Unless you count those geographically separate clusters with FDDI links :)
Come to think of it, I have like 3 of those cards and even some cables in London.
sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:06, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/25/2012 03:02 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Ah. Is any sort of encryption done for cluster-over-IP?
Oh heck no. That sort of overhead's resultant latency would destroy
the performance of a cluster on all but the very fastest of machines.
Ah, right, I'm forgetting that clustering sends a lot of data.
Further, most VMS clusters are built with machines in the same
datacenter. It's not generally a wide-area thing.
Mmmm, true. Clustering is generally used for practical purposes and not my crazy experiments.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:03, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Install Phase IV if you want to retain your sanity.
I'll go do that once I find where I dumped the install discs...
]
Hobbyist ISO + offical ISOs for AXP can be found here: http://rhesus.sampsa.com/medialib.start.html
Use the main site, the mirror isn't ready.
On 12/25/2012 03:02 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Ah. Is any sort of encryption done for cluster-over-IP?
Oh heck no. That sort of overhead's resultant latency would destroy
the performance of a cluster on all but the very fastest of machines.
Further, most VMS clusters are built with machines in the same
datacenter. It's not generally a wide-area thing.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:03, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/25/2012 02:56 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope...SCS, which is Systems Communications Services if memory serves.
(is that right, Brian?) Completely unrelated to DECnet.
Brian (Hechinger) and I once discussed the possibility of implementing
a similar clustering system within NetBSD. I think just implementing
the SCS protocol itself would be a good start. I wonder if there's
enough documentation out there to do it.
What'd be really interesting is joining that to a VMS cluster. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:02, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:01, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:00, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:56, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope, it's own LAN protocol.
Ah. That would explain why it's still functioning despite DECnet being hilariously broken on the simulated alpha. ;)
Install Phase IV if you want to retain your sanity.
I'll go do that once I find where I dumped the install discs...
On 12/25/2012 02:56 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope...SCS, which is Systems Communications Services if memory serves.
(is that right, Brian?) Completely unrelated to DECnet.
Brian (Hechinger) and I once discussed the possibility of implementing
a similar clustering system within NetBSD. I think just implementing
the SCS protocol itself would be a good start. I wonder if there's
enough documentation out there to do it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:01, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:00, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:56, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope, it's own LAN protocol.
Ah. That would explain why it's still functioning despite DECnet being hilariously broken on the simulated alpha. ;)
Install Phase IV if you want to retain your sanity.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:01, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:55, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" =
<system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:=20 >=20 >>=20 >> On 25 Dec 2012,
at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:=20 >>=20 >>> =3D20 > On 25 Dec 2012, at
21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: = >=3D20 >>>> =3D20 >> On 25
Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote: >>=3D20 = >>> >> 46.65.175.115
(gvax.sampsa.com) >>>=3D20 >>> Circuit is up on my end. >>>> =3D20 >>
Okay. it'll be a bit for me=3D85I forgot his router = password and >> I
need =3D an area for this. ;) >=3D20 > Well, ask Johnny for an area =
then - >> and get your nodes into the DB :)=20 >>=20 >> Will it be a
problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?=20 >=20 > Clustering
does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Clustering over ethernet uses ethernet phsy/data-link and adds its own
network layer. Cluster communications over ethernet (LAVC) begin early
in VMS long before DECnet or TCP/IP are ever started. Recent versions
of VMS for Alphas and Itanium do have a cluster-over-IP option but it's
not a requirement to cluster over ethernet.
Ah. Is any sort of encryption done for cluster-over-IP?
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.