On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:00, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:56, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope, it's own LAN protocol.
Ah. That would explain why it's still functioning despite DECnet being hilariously broken on the simulated alpha. ;)
Sampsa
Might be a problem for you, my end won't care - OSI does Phase IV quite OK-ish.
Pain in the ass to manage though.
sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:54, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com)
Circuit is up on my end.
Okay. it'll be a bit for me I forgot his router password and I need an area for this. ;)
Well, ask Johnny for an area then - and get your nodes into the DB :)
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Sampsa
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:55, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" =
<system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:=20 >=20 >>=20 >> On 25 Dec 2012,
at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:=20 >>=20 >>> =3D20 > On 25 Dec 2012, at
21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: = >=3D20 >>>> =3D20 >> On 25
Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote: >>=3D20 = >>> >> 46.65.175.115
(gvax.sampsa.com) >>>=3D20 >>> Circuit is up on my end. >>>> =3D20 >>
Okay. it'll be a bit for me=3D85I forgot his router = password and >> I
need =3D an area for this. ;) >=3D20 > Well, ask Johnny for an area =
then - >> and get your nodes into the DB :)=20 >>=20 >> Will it be a
problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?=20 >=20 > Clustering
does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Clustering over ethernet uses ethernet phsy/data-link and adds its own
network layer. Cluster communications over ethernet (LAVC) begin early
in VMS long before DECnet or TCP/IP are ever started. Recent versions
of VMS for Alphas and Itanium do have a cluster-over-IP option but it's
not a requirement to cluster over ethernet.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:56, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
Nope, it's own LAN protocol.
Sampsa
How about the sun? I hear that's pretty warm. It would offer plenty of space for us, too.
True, travel there might prove difficult. ...
Oh, we can always take the night trip there.
--
Regards, Rok
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:55, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
=20 > On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: >=20
=20 >> On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote: >>=20 >>>
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com) >>>=20 >>> Circuit is up on my end.
=20 >> Okay. it'll be a bit for me=85I forgot his router password and
I need = an area for this. ;) >=20 > Well, ask Johnny for an area then -
and get your nodes into the DB :)
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com)
Circuit is up on my end.
Okay. it'll be a bit for me I forgot his router password and I need an area for this. ;)
Well, ask Johnny for an area then - and get your nodes into the DB :)
Hey Johnny, I need an area for my cluster running on a friend's server. ;)
Sampsa
Apologies if this sent twice my email client/mail server decided to act funny...
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
=20 > On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: >=20
=20 >> On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote: >>=20 >>>
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com) >>>=20 >>> Circuit is up on my end.
=20 >> Okay. it'll be a bit for me=85I forgot his router password and
I need = an area for this. ;) >=20 > Well, ask Johnny for an area then -
and get your nodes into the DB :)
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP!
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com)
Circuit is up on my end.
Okay. it'll be a bit for me I forgot his router password and I need an area for this. ;)
Well, ask Johnny for an area then - and get your nodes into the DB :)
Will it be a problem that all of these systems are DECnet-OSI?
Sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:27, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 14:25, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
46.65.175.115 (gvax.sampsa.com)
Circuit is up on my end.
Okay. it'll be a bit for me I forgot his router password and I need an area for this. ;)
Well, ask Johnny for an area then - and get your nodes into the DB :)
Sampsa
