So how do we find them when crawling?
Short answer - don't know. I believe the Ciscos have DECnet node numbers
and run an NML equivalent (i.e. they respond to NCP commands) but I don't
know much about them. Sorry; I don't have one.
Bob
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:14, Bob Armstrong <bob at jfcl.com> wrote:
Found the problem, STUPI isn't listing you as a known circuit:
I think the actual connection is between their Cisco routers. STUPI has
nothing to do with it and doesn't know about it.
Bob
So how do we find them when crawling?
Found the problem, STUPI isn't listing you as a known circuit:
I think the actual connection is between their Cisco routers. STUPI has
nothing to do with it and doesn't know about it.
Bob
On 25 Dec 2012, at 18:11, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:07, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:04, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
What's the Alpha hosted on - is it getting promiscuous mode access to the Ethernet adapter?
It's running in PersonalAlpha on Windows Server 2003, so i'm not actually sure.
Check the network config.
Here's mine (running on Win2K3 on a VMware Fusion VM) and DECNET works fine:
Oooops. It's not PersonalAlpha. It's FreeAXP. ;)
http://i45.tinypic.com/apfz0i.jpg
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:07, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:04, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
What's the Alpha hosted on - is it getting promiscuous mode access to the Ethernet adapter?
It's running in PersonalAlpha on Windows Server 2003, so i'm not actually sure.
Check the network config.
Here's mine (running on Win2K3 on a VMware Fusion VM) and DECNET works fine:
http://i45.tinypic.com/apfz0i.jpg
On 26 Dec 2012, at 01:04, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
What's the Alpha hosted on - is it getting promiscuous mode access to the Ethernet adapter?
It's running in PersonalAlpha on Windows Server 2003, so i'm not actually sure.
Check the network config.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 17:59, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 26 Dec 2012, at 00:58, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
The simulated Alpha throws a bunch of errors when I try to do anything involving DECnet. I might just be starting things out of order.
What's the Alpha hosted on - is it getting promiscuous mode access to the Ethernet adapter?
It's running in PersonalAlpha on Windows Server 2003, so i'm not actually sure.
Sampsa
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 26 Dec 2012, at 00:58, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
The simulated Alpha throws a bunch of errors when I try to do anything involving DECnet. I might just be starting things out of order.
What's the Alpha hosted on - is it getting promiscuous mode access to the Ethernet adapter?
Sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 17:48, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 15:00, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
=20 > On 25 Dec 2012, at 21:56, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: >=20
=20 >>> Clustering does not depend on DECnet or TCP/IP! >>=20 >>
Really? I thought clustering over ethernet used DECnet. >>=20 >=20 >
Nope, it's own LAN protocol.
Ah. That would explain why it's still functioning despite DECnet being =
hilariously broken on the simulated alpha. ;)
How's it broken?
The simulated Alpha throws a bunch of errors when I try to do anything involving DECnet. I might just be starting things out of order.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> writes:
On 12/25/2012 03:05 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: >> Brian (Hechinger) and I
once discussed the possibility of implementing >> a similar clustering
system within NetBSD. I think just implementing >> the SCS protocol
itself would be a good start. I wonder if there's >> enough
documentation out there to do it. > > What'd be really interesting is
joining that to a VMS cluster. ;)
It would be a huge amount of work, and I'm not sure it'd be practical.
There are a lot of things in VMS that just don't have a mappable
counterpart in the UNIX world. RMS, for instance.
I've had my head deep in the bowels of RMS for the past 4 years. It's
not something that I believe would ever see the light of day on a non-
VMS O/S notwithstanding its appearance in the ontogeny of VMS.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
