So, is anyone familiar with the NICE protocol at all?
Not me.
However, consulting the world's largest data mining operation turns up the
following which might give some insight into using it from VMS:
https://mail.encompasserve.org/anon/htnotes/note?f1=VMS&f2=1723.12
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
OK, I'll make it opt-in - if there's an INFO.TXT in the public FAL dir, I'll
run the NCP commands, otherwise I'll show nothing.
Is that OK with you?
Thanks - that addresses the concerns I have.
I hope that anyone who already has a file called INFO.TXT in place will be ok
with the new significance it takes on.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
So, is anyone familiar with the NICE protocol at all?
Barring that, does anyone know if there is a NICE client (ala NCP) for DECnet on Linux?
Thanks,
-brian
I thought there is one, but I may be misremembering. The spec is in the network management architecture document in the DECnet architecture documents set. It's pretty simple.
paul
So, is anyone familiar with the NICE protocol at all?
Barring that, does anyone know if there is a NICE client (ala NCP) for DECnet on Linux?
Thanks,
-brian
On 2012-12-17 21:08, Clem Cole wrote:
You can get the mailers to use non-HMTL. I subscribe to a number of
mailing lists in digest form. Two I can think of that are best for me
because of the volume are: beowulf and lustre . Both at 7-bit ASCII,
nothing fancy. I read them both with traditional tools as well
as browser based tools -> my choice.
And I very much prefer digests - for the reasons Bob mentioned - it's
just easier to manage, particularly for high volume like this one.
So how do you skip a thread that you feel is irrelevant, if you have a plain straight text digest?
Johnny
Clem Cole
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
On 2012-12-17 20:51, Bob Armstrong wrote:
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the
digests I've tested
on various sites.
It sends the digest in html with the messages sorted by
subject and a
table of contents at the top. Just scan the list of topics and
click on any
that you're interested in (conversely, don't click on any that
you aren't!).
Likewise, the web archive displays a tree view of messages
by thread.
Well, that fails it for me then. I hate html formatted mail even more...
Johnny
On 12/17/2012 2:54 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-12-17 20:51, Bob Armstrong wrote:
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the digests I've tested
on various sites.
It sends the digest in html with the messages sorted by subject and a
table of contents at the top. Just scan the list of topics and click on any
that you're interested in (conversely, don't click on any that you aren't!).
Likewise, the web archive displays a tree view of messages by thread.
Well, that fails it for me then. I hate html formatted mail even more...
Johnny
The emails themselves aren't actually HTML formatted (unless they were that way to start) it's just wrapping them in a web page.
-brian
You can get the mailers to use non-HMTL. I subscribe to a number of mailing lists in digest form. Two I can think of that are best for me because of the volume are: beowulf and lustre . Both at 7-bit ASCII, nothing fancy. I read them both with traditional tools as well as browser based tools -> my choice.
And I very much prefer digests - for the reasons Bob mentioned - it's just easier to manage, particularly for high volume like this one.
Clem Cole
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-17 20:51, Bob Armstrong wrote:
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the digests I've tested
on various sites.
It sends the digest in html with the messages sorted by subject and a
table of contents at the top. Just scan the list of topics and click on any
that you're interested in (conversely, don't click on any that you aren't!).
Likewise, the web archive displays a tree view of messages by thread.
Well, that fails it for me then. I hate html formatted mail even more...
Johnny
On 2012-12-17 20:51, Bob Armstrong wrote:
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the digests I've tested
on various sites.
It sends the digest in html with the messages sorted by subject and a
table of contents at the top. Just scan the list of topics and click on any
that you're interested in (conversely, don't click on any that you aren't!).
Likewise, the web archive displays a tree view of messages by thread.
Well, that fails it for me then. I hate html formatted mail even more...
Johnny
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the digests I've tested
on various sites.
It sends the digest in html with the messages sorted by subject and a
table of contents at the top. Just scan the list of topics and click on any
that you're interested in (conversely, don't click on any that you aren't!).
Likewise, the web archive displays a tree view of messages by thread.
Bob
On 2012-12-17 20:43, Bob Armstrong wrote:
more interested in seeing why people want digest mode (as I said, I am
having
difficulty in seeing the attraction it clearly has for some)
Among other things, digests are sorted by topic. When a particular chain
of conversation strays far from anything I'm interested in, it's easy to
simply skip it. An alternative, which I use now but find less attractive,
is to create rules that redirect certain HECnet subjects to the trash.
That capability is not something I've ever seen in the digests I've tested on various sites. Does it send a separate digest per topic then?
Johnny
