Hey,
Does anyone know the actual syntax for MOUNTR.CMD?
It seems it does not infact match what the TSU update manual says it
should.
SJ 0: 13:25:18 -- ERROR IN MOUNTR COMMAND FILE --
SJ 0: COMMAND LINE CONTAINING "" BEING IGNORED
SJ 0:
SJ 0:
SJ 0: 13:25:18 -- ERROR IN MOUNTR COMMAND FILE --
SJ 0: COMMAND LINE CONTAINING "" BEING IGNORED
$TYPE PS:<SYSTEM>MOUNTR.CMD
!How do I delete a line (using SED)
!MOUNTR COMMAND FILE
DOMESTIC STRUCTURE DECUS:
DOMESTIC STRUCTURE USERS:
http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/BB-Y390S-BM_1990/01/tsu/tsu.mem.html says:
$TYPE MOUNTR.CMD<RET>
!MOUNTR COMMAND FILE
DOMESTIC STRUCTURE CBL79:
DOMESTIC STRUCTURE SUPT:
$
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
It just came to my attention that a pair of RP07 drives in the north of
Sweden needs a new home. One functional, the other in unknown state.
If anyone is near (unlikely) or interested in a long drive (very long),
let me know.
Messages have been passed to several parties, so if several are
interested, we'll sort things out at that point.
Johnny
Yes, if it is not needed to be picked up right away.
-------- Original message --------
From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE>
Date: 04/05/2015 23:54 (GMT+02:00)
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] RP07s to a good home...
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:18:18PM +0300, Kari Uusim?ki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in some of the stuff. The RP07 would be one of them.
> How should we go forward with the discussion?
I'm just about to hit the sack. I'll send a mail to you, Ragge
and the others tomorrow.
Will you be able to pick it up?
/P
>
>
> Kari
>
>
>
> On 4.5.2015 23:05, Pontus wrote:
> >On 05/04/2015 07:54 PM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
> >>I've been working out a deal with Ragge and several others for a
> >>few weeks now after announcing on CC-tech.
> >>
> >>I and Ragge strongly prefer that you go through me.
> >>
> >>The RP07 are still unclaimed and so is a lot more. Let me know
> >>if you are seriously interested and I'll fill you in and include
> >>you in future talks.
> >>
> >>/P
> >>
> >
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >I realize now that I might have worded the above a bit strong. You are
> >welcome to spread this as much as you want. But it will probably benefit
> >all if I'm in the loop.
> >
> >Anyway, now that I have a proper keyboard (not just my phones onscreen
> >one) I can give you some more details. It's the computer club in Lule?
> >that is cleaning out old "junk". Here are some pictures:
> >
> >http://brain.brokenbrain.se/skrot_dh1/
> >
> >Take a break and look at them now.
> >
> >Now that you are back, here is what is shown, more or less.
> >
> >Spoken for:
> >
> > * DECsystem 5500
> > * Nord-10 crates
> > * ND-100 cards
> > * HAWK-disks
> > * Terminalen for Nord-10
> > * 10-20 1/2" band
> > * A bunch of cabling, docs and 5 1/4" floppies with software for Nord
> >computers.
> > * DEC 8400
> > * DEC PRO380
> > * RA72
> > * Unibus och BiBus-kort and some XMI.
> > * RX01 -floppies
> > * 4000/500
> > * 4000/90 (memory removed)
> > * infoserver 100
> > * 2 * R215F
> > * RX01/02-floppies
> > * 11/750 without PSU
> >
> >Probably spoken for (we are working out the shipping details):
> >
> > * DEC 8400
> > * MicroVAX 8354
> > * TU81 /w RA82
> >
> >Not spoken for:
> >
> > * 4000/60
> > * 1/2" tapes (lot of them)
> > * Two RA90's
> > * MV3900 /w RA82 and RL02 on top.
> > * VAXstation 3100
> > * VAXserver 3100
> > * Two Vaxstation 3100/76
> > * HSC90
> > * Two RP07, one spare part.
> > * MikroVAX 3800
> > * MicroVAX only marked 640QR?
> > * Lots of CI and SDI cabling.
> > * 4000/300 (looked empty unfortunately)
> >
> >Before you ask the brief case with test equipment on picture
> >20150407_100342.jpg is an alignment tool for an RP06 and Ragge will keep
> >it.
> >
> >Regarding shipping, there are two cars going from Lule? to Uppsala that
> >can bring a moderate amount of gear.
> >
> >I'll answer any questions you might have as best I can.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Pontus.
> >
> >.
> >
>
I think I've located the SPL install file for ALL-IN-1, anybody know just exactly how difficult this is to install (I've heard horror stories)..
sampsa
I've read my BP2 v2.7 tape. I did it on a UNIX system using Johnny's
tape tools, and I have it a a .TPC file.
The tape read cleanly, but again I do not know where this came
from...it has a handwritten label indicating that it's BP2 v2.7, but it
may have actually been written from the corrupted tape image in the
trailing-edge archive. That archive has been around for long enough for
this to be a concern.
Is there anyone hanging out tonight who would like to assist me in
testing this?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I have located 9-track install tapes of BP2 v2.7 and PDP-11 C v1.2 in
my tape library. They are not original tapes; the labels are
hand-written (not by me) so I don't know their status. I will attempt
to recover them in the coming days.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
So I'm back to hacking on RSX-11M-Plus again, this time in a more
leisurely fashion, and under simh on a laptop since I'm still stuck in
bed with the "Primus Plague" that I caught while at VCF.
I'm trying to install C and F77 from .tpc files in the trailing-edge
archive, and I'm failing miserably. I've attached them to tq0 and have
tried every possible combination of FORMAT=TPC/FORMAT=SIMH, use of
mtcvt23, etc and cannot get past "tape label error on MU0:" from
autoins.cmd.
Doing this under RSTS/E is a breeze, and I expected it to be even
easier under RSX.
I assume I'm not the first person to hit this problem. Before I dig
deeper and spend a lot of time, does anyone know what's going on?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Should be good now!
Regards, Mark
On 03/05/15 09:51, Jim Carpenter wrote:
> Most of the files are inaccessible because of a permission problem.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
>> I've just uploaded all I have here:
>> http://www.wickensonline.co.uk/static/files/Ultrix/
>>
>> I can't guarantee all the images work, but the images in the v4.4 directory
>> were ripped from original CDROMs by me - so if there is an issue with these
>> they can probably be corrected.
>>
>> Regards, Mark
>>
>> On 02/05/15 14:22, Steve Davidson wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> The previous email came from the wrong account. Sorry about that! In any
>>> event do you have the ULTRIX 4.5 and ULTRIX DECnet 4.5 kits in your
>>> collection? Also any other Layered Products for ULTRIX 4.5 would be
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>>
