Hmm,
That's odd, I'll have a look..
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +961 788 10537
On 24 Jun 2013, at 18:14, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-06-24 17:11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-06-24 17:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Speaking of network issues, just looking at the cache right now, I think
Sampsa have something funny as well.
I can see packets from him with a mac address of aa-00-04-00-00-00,
which is more than a little odd...
Ok. More funny stuff, while I'm at it. Sampsa seem to like to have
create mac addresses in general as well, but that is ok. But the one
above is maybe less well choosen.
*Sigh* proofreading... I need to proofread things...
"Sampsa like to have creative mac addresses..." was what I was trying to say. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-06-24 17:11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-06-24 17:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Speaking of network issues, just looking at the cache right now, I think
Sampsa have something funny as well.
I can see packets from him with a mac address of aa-00-04-00-00-00,
which is more than a little odd...
Ok. More funny stuff, while I'm at it. Sampsa seem to like to have
create mac addresses in general as well, but that is ok. But the one
above is maybe less well choosen.
*Sigh* proofreading... I need to proofread things...
"Sampsa like to have creative mac addresses..." was what I was trying to say. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-06-24 17:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Speaking of network issues, just looking at the cache right now, I think
Sampsa have something funny as well.
I can see packets from him with a mac address of aa-00-04-00-00-00,
which is more than a little odd...
Ok. More funny stuff, while I'm at it. Sampsa seem to like to have create mac addresses in general as well, but that is ok. But the one above is maybe less well choosen.
Anyway, as I turned off the connection to Steve (area 19), I noticed that SKNLIN:: started claiming it was the next hop to area 19. Very broken, considering no connection to area 19 now exists.
Turns out SKNLIN:: is running Linux. I think there are lots of unsolved issues/problems with DECnet under Linux. Just pointing it out so people can be ware...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Speaking of network issues, just looking at the cache right now, I think Sampsa have something funny as well.
I can see packets from him with a mac address of aa-00-04-00-00-00, which is more than a little odd...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-06-24 02:54, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-06-24 00:20, Oleg Safiullin wrote:
Robert Jarratt wrote:
I have noticed that for the last three hours or so my adjacency with
19.41 (my router is 5.1023) is bouncing every 10-20 seconds. I don t
know if this is just something happening to me or if everyone is
seeing this?
...
05:16:43 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:16:43 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:00 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:00 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:13 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:13 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:15 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:15 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:28 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:28 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:30 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:30 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
...
Yeah, I saw it too. It stopped when I started thinking about doing
something about it. As a part of that thinking, I restarted the bridge
at my end to see some information. For some reason that got things in
order. Possible some pollution of the hop cache in my bridge? I don't
know, and I can't examine it after the restart. Oh well. We'll see if it
reappears, or if someone else knows of some reason for it...
Well, it has continued every 15 seconds for more than a day. I've turned off the bridge to Steve Davidson for now. Steve, please contact me.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-06-24 00:20, Oleg Safiullin wrote:
Robert Jarratt wrote:
I have noticed that for the last three hours or so my adjacency with
19.41 (my router is 5.1023) is bouncing every 10-20 seconds. I don t
know if this is just something happening to me or if everyone is
seeing this?
...
05:16:43 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:16:43 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:00 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:00 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:13 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:13 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:15 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:15 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:28 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:28 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:30 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:30 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
...
Yeah, I saw it too. It stopped when I started thinking about doing something about it. As a part of that thinking, I restarted the bridge at my end to see some information. For some reason that got things in order. Possible some pollution of the hop cache in my bridge? I don't know, and I can't examine it after the restart. Oh well. We'll see if it reappears, or if someone else knows of some reason for it...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Robert Jarratt wrote:
I have noticed that for the last three hours or so my adjacency with 19.41 (my router is 5.1023) is bouncing every 10-20 seconds. I don t know if this is just something happening to me or if everyone is seeing this?
...
05:16:43 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:16:43 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:00 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:00 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:13 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:13 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:15 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:15 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:28 Event type 4.18, Adjacency down
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:28 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Dropped by adjacent node, Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
05:17:30 Event type 4.15, Adjacency up
Occurred 24-JUN-13 05:17:30 on node 62.637 (CTAKAH)
Circuit UNA-0
Adjacent node = 19.41 (SG1)
...
I have noticed that for the last three hours or so my adjacency with 19.41 (my router is 5.1023) is bouncing every 10-20 seconds. I don t know if this is just something happening to me or if everyone is seeing this?
Regards
Rob
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Thought that went off-list...ah well. It won't be that for too long. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Hello!
That's okay. You should see what happened to Dave concerning a set of
MMJ things.
----
Of course the problem being discussed has nothing to do with the fact
that there's a dozen Yeti at work trying to crash all of China for
"Free Tibet".
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Thu, 21 Jun 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Thought that went off-list...ah well. It won't be that for too long. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
