HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

1 participants
15557 discussions

What happens when the host uses a dynamically assigned IP address?

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-09-25 17:04, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! Still thinking about working on how to bring up a system that's eligible for participation within our group. The only stumbling block isn't the OS or the emulated system. In fact it happens to be the fact that my Internet connection is managed via a DSL device who is assigned an IP address via PPPoE services. Does any of our members also have that problem? I actually asked the service provider what was involved with ordering service for a static one several years earlier. Problem then, was that the copper was too old in my part of the country. I imagine that FIOS (Fiber-optic based service from the phone company) is the reason why the copper isn't be upgraded. And since my cable company can be all thumbs when performing service I turned down their offers...... Several people (including me) do not have a fixed address. However, my ISP seems to change my IP less than once a year, so it's not really a big problem. So I think it more depends on how often do you see address changes? Johnny

11 years, 8 months

What happens when the host uses a dynamically assigned IP address?

by sampsa＠mac.com

On 25 Sep 2013, at 17:04, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote: Hello! Still thinking about working on how to bring up a system that's eligible for participation within our group. The only stumbling block isn't the OS or the emulated system. In fact it happens to be the fact that my Internet connection is managed via a DSL device who is assigned an IP address via PPPoE services. Does any of our members also have that problem? I actually asked the service provider what was involved with ordering service for a static one several years earlier. Problem then, was that the copper was too old in my part of the country. I imagine that FIOS (Fiber-optic based service from the phone company) is the reason why the copper isn't be upgraded. And since my cable company can be all thumbs when performing service I turned down their offers...... If you can run MULTINET then Steve Davidson can hook you up to SG1::. GORVAX used to run MULTINET as well but I rebuilt it lately as a plain area router. Another idea (not necessarily a good one, performance-wise) is to ask for a VPN connection to somebody on HECnet, make sure you get the same IP address every time you connect the VPN and route the bridge's UDP packets over that. That's how HILANT:: et all are connected, the machine that runs the bridge is VPN'd into my other network, giving it a static (NAT) IP address. sampsa

11 years, 8 months

What happens when the host uses a dynamically assigned IP address?

by b4＠gewt.net

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! Still thinking about working on how to bring up a system that's eligible for participation within our group. The only stumbling block isn't the OS or the emulated system. In fact it happens to be the fact that my Internet connection is managed via a DSL device who is assigned an IP address via PPPoE services. Does any of our members also have that problem? I actually asked the service provider what was involved with ordering service for a static one several years earlier. I have the same problem. I solved it with a good router + Brian's scripts + a UPS. Problem then, was that the copper was too old in my part of the country. I imagine that FIOS (Fiber-optic based service from the phone company) is the reason why the copper isn't be upgraded. And since my cable company can be all thumbs when performing service I turned down their offers...... ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 8 months

What happens when the host uses a dynamically assigned IP address?

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

Hello! Still thinking about working on how to bring up a system that's eligible for participation within our group. The only stumbling block isn't the OS or the emulated system. In fact it happens to be the fact that my Internet connection is managed via a DSL device who is assigned an IP address via PPPoE services. Does any of our members also have that problem? I actually asked the service provider what was involved with ordering service for a static one several years earlier. Problem then, was that the copper was too old in my part of the country. I imagine that FIOS (Fiber-optic based service from the phone company) is the reason why the copper isn't be upgraded. And since my cable company can be all thumbs when performing service I turned down their offers...... ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

11 years, 8 months

Public access?

by b4＠gewt.net

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Sampsa Laine wrote: Of course I am more worried about the non-DEC stuff which could be 'pwned' using a VMS or Ultrix system as a beachhead. That's my concern as well, I really don't want to put my HECnet stuff on a separate VLAN, right now it's on my internal network with all my other stuff. Is it posible to deny an user access to the IP stack (either UCX or multinet)? If so, I would setup my guest accounts to 'decnet only' access. I'd like to do this as well - if the user has no access to IP, I'd be happier to let pretty much anyone in. I'll happily give anyone access to TOPS-10. It doesn't have a TCP/IP stack. ;) sampsa -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 8 months

Public access?

by sampsa＠mac.com

On 25 Sep 2013, at 16:47, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote: I'd seriously consider picking Steven Hoffman's brains on this before opening a system up to the world. I had thought about trying to get a VMS box collocated for a 'UK deathrow' experience but Hoff seriously put me off the idea ;) And I think you have the same 'seat of your pants' mentality that I do, which probably isn't a win when you're looking to manage a public facing system (or at least a public facing system that the public know about!) Mark. This is why I manually verify any new user applications and audit what they do for a while. I don't get many hacking attempts or anything on the boxes that I've got telnet open on, it's a different matter once they have an account of course. I could maybe move the HILANT cluster into its own VLAN, so IP access from there wouldn't be a big deal, could even firewall most outgoing traffic. sampsa

11 years, 8 months

Public access?

by e.olofsen＠xs4all.nl

Hi Sampsa, I was considering updating the HECNET-INFO in INFO.TXT with an ACCESS field. At present it contains: REGISTER,NOGUEST,NOIP The latter means it is not connected to the internet. With the OS and hardware information, this may be useful for people to see how they can get access to an interesting machine. I hadn't played with FAL for many months, so I discovered the password settings for the DECNET accounts and objects were inconsistent, probably resulting in the security alarms I had mailed you about some time ago (sorry)! Erik On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:48:39AM +0200, Sampsa Laine wrote: Of course I am more worried about the non-DEC stuff which could be 'pwned' using a VMS or Ultrix system as a beachhead. That's my concern as well, I really don't want to put my HECnet stuff on a separate VLAN, right now it's on my internal network with all my other stuff. Is it posible to deny an user access to the IP stack (either UCX or multinet)? If so, I would setup my guest accounts to 'decnet only' access. I'd like to do this as well - if the user has no access to IP, I'd be happier to let pretty much anyone in. sampsa

11 years, 8 months

Public access?

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 25/09/2013 01:54, Sampsa Laine wrote: I'm always happy to take more users onto CHIMPY and the HILANT clusters - you think I should let people in comp.os.vms know about these? Does anybody mind 'outsiders' getting access to HECnet? I don't mind. Most will probably not explore the fact that there is a big DECnet behind the machines. It is not that we are preventing people today either. It's just that there have never been much fuss about HECnet. However, I can understand if some people feel worried about traffic and issues. If so, let us know, and we'll try to think of what to do. This is why I manually vet the account requests - if the email address or name seem totally bullshit, I just ignore the request. I get maybe 2-3 new users per week on each system..I personally don't want to let the Deathrow guys behind my firewall :) sampsa Sampsa I'd seriously consider picking Steven Hoffman's brains on this before opening a system up to the world. I had thought about trying to get a VMS box collocated for a 'UK deathrow' experience but Hoff seriously put me off the idea ;) And I think you have the same 'seat of your pants' mentality that I do, which probably isn't a win when you're looking to manage a public facing system (or at least a public facing system that the public know about!) Mark. -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo

11 years, 8 months

CHIMPT launchpad..

by sampsa＠mac.com

On 25 Sep 2013, at 16:45, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote: Quite possibly. But then I've been asleep since then... Maybe you just forgot to close the session sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932

11 years, 8 months

CHIMPT launchpad..

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 25/09/2013 15:43, Sampsa Laine wrote: Did you telnet into CHIMPY last night? That would solve the mystery.. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 25 Sep 2013, at 16:42, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote: On 25/09/2013 15:30, Sampsa Laine wrote: Nope, just saw that the guy was logged into the launch pad from a UK BT ISP address for 7 hours. Maybe someone just forgot to close a window or something. I should probably implement logging for LAUNCH at some point. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 As with most of these things, it's probably safe to assume that I am the root cause ;) Mark. -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo Quite possibly. But then I've been asleep since then... -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo

11 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet