Netbsd's pkgsrc does support osf/1, although, many packages, such as
gcc, refuses to build. I was able to build the following from
pkgsrc-2013Q1, alas, nothing terribly useful.
autoconf-2.69nb1.tgz f2c-20100903.tgz
libgetopt-1.4.4.tgz p5-gettext-1.05nb8.tgz
tnftp-20070806.tgz
autoconf213-2.13nb2.tgz fib-980203.tgz
libiconv-1.14nb2.tgz pax-20080110nb2.tgz
top-3.6.1nb1.tgz
automake-1.13.1.tgz flex-2.5.36nb1.tgz
libpcap-1.3.0nb2.tgz pcre-8.32.tgz
unzip-6.0nb1.tgz
automake14-1.4.6nb2.tgz gettext-lib-0.18.2.1.tgz
libslang2-2.2.4nb2.tgz perl-5.16.2nb4.tgz
vim-7.3.762.tgz
bash-4.2nb2.tgz gettext-tools-0.18.2.1.tgz
libtool-base-2.2.6bnb8.tgz pgp-2.6.3ianb1.tgz
vim-share-7.3.762.tgz
bash-completion-1.0nb1.tgz gmake-3.82nb5.tgz
lynx-2.8.7nb5.tgz pgp5-5.0inb1.tgz
wget-1.14nb2.tgz
bison-2.7.tgz gnupg-1.4.13nb2.tgz
m4-1.4.16nb3.tgz pkg-config-0.28.tgz
xorg-cf-files-1.0.4nb5.tgz
bzip2-1.0.6.tgz gtar-base-1.26nb2.tgz
makedepend-1.0.4.tgz pkg_install-info-4.5nb3.tgz
xproto-7.0.23nb2.tgz
compat_headers-0.2.tgz gtexinfo-4.13anb1.tgz
mktemp-1.7.tgz readline-6.2.tgz xz-5.0.4.tgz
coreutils-8.13nb5.tgz help2man-1.40.13.tgz
nbench-2.2.2.tgz rsync-3.0.9nb1.tgz
zip-3.0nb2.tgz
curl-7.29.0nb2.tgz imake-1.0.5.tgz
nbpatch-20100124.tgz screen-4.0.3nb5.tgz
zlib-1.2.7.tgz
digest-20121220.tgz kbproto-1.0.6.tgz
openssh-5.8.2nb8.tgz sudo-1.7.10p7.tgz
emacs22-nox11-22.3nb4.tgz libffi-3.0.12.tgz
osabi-OSF1-5.1.tgz tcp_wrappers-7.6.4.tgz
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a
question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed on
a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another linux
machine if possible.
I still need to work this out on one of my Tru64 machines so this is all
loose theory so bear with me but
Tru64, being a UNIX has the environment required, so that's a start.
You can bootstrap and use NetBSD pakgsrc on Tru64 I THINK. It lists OSF/1 as
a supported environment, which I think is their way of saying they support
it? I dunno if anyone ever tried it out?
Given bootstrapped pkgsrc you then have all the OSS compiler tools required
to compile the bridge binary
????
Profit?
I really ought to get it working properly on my PWS500au and try it for
certainty.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On 15/10/2013 22:47, Mark Benson wrote:
On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed on a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another linux machine if possible.
I still need to work this out on one of my Tru64 machines so this is all loose theory so bear with me but
Tru64, being a UNIX has the environment required, so that's a start.
You can bootstrap and use NetBSD pakgsrc on Tru64 I THINK. It lists OSF/1 as a supported environment, which I think is their way of saying they support it? I dunno if anyone ever tried it out?
Given bootstrapped pkgsrc you then have all the OSS compiler tools required to compile the bridge binary
????
Profit?
I really ought to get it working properly on my PWS500au and try it for certainty.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
Looks like, from searching the changelog for libpcap, that there has been some recent activity involving tru64 (Thu. March 11, 2010.) This is definitely encouraging.
Mark.
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://hecnet.euhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
On 15/10/2013 22:47, Mark Benson wrote:
On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed on a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another linux machine if possible.
I still need to work this out on one of my Tru64 machines so this is all loose theory so bear with me but
Tru64, being a UNIX has the environment required, so that's a start.
You can bootstrap and use NetBSD pakgsrc on Tru64 I THINK. It lists OSF/1 as a supported environment, which I think is their way of saying they support it? I dunno if anyone ever tried it out?
Given bootstrapped pkgsrc you then have all the OSS compiler tools required to compile the bridge binary
????
Profit?
I really ought to get it working properly on my PWS500au and try it for certainty.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
I'll try and give it a whirl tomorrow if I get a chance... sounds like a perfect challenge for us unix-oriented hecnetters!
Regards, Mark.
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://hecnet.euhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed on a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another linux machine if possible.
I still need to work this out on one of my Tru64 machines so this is all loose theory so bear with me but
Tru64, being a UNIX has the environment required, so that's a start.
You can bootstrap and use NetBSD pakgsrc on Tru64 I THINK. It lists OSF/1 as a supported environment, which I think is their way of saying they support it? I dunno if anyone ever tried it out?
Given bootstrapped pkgsrc you then have all the OSS compiler tools required to compile the bridge binary
????
Profit?
I really ought to get it working properly on my PWS500au and try it for certainty.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
I tried it more than a year ago on a v5.0 system and it's C compiler barfed on it. Since the bridge program runs very well indeed on a small laptop under fedora 14 I didn't pursue the tru64 track.
Van: Mark Wickens
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 oktober 2013 23:00
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] HECnet bridge on tru64
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a
question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed
on a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another
linux machine if possible.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://hecnet.euhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
I'm interested to know as well.
Thanks,
Jerome
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a
question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed on
a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another linux
machine if possible.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://hecnet.euhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
On 2013-10-15 23:00, Mark Wickens wrote:
OK, so given that I have so little time at the moment I'm going to ask a
question that I could answer if I had a chance to play.
Does the hecnet bridge compile and run on tru64? I've got 5.1c installed
on a machine I'm taking to DEC Legacy and I'd rather not take another
linux machine if possible.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
I haven't tried, and I haven't heard anyone else, but I do believe it should work... Might need to tweak a thing or two...
Johnny
Thankyou so much Ian and Mark.
I'd been googling and googling but never came up with the right thing! Thats perfect.
Daniel.
On 15/10/2013, at 5:29 AM, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote:
If you use a modular keystone system in your location, you'll want something like this:
http://www.iec.net/rj1106f-mtdcbk.html
The nice part of a system like this is that you can have a single plate and fill it with a bunch of differenct connectors - everything from cat5 ethernet, to cable tv, to BNC (great for your thin-net network).
Ian
On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote:
Google for "wallplate WP509". Assuming of course you meant wall plate, you want the WP509, MMJ wallplate. There are many sources, ranging from 5 to 15 bucks per piece.
-Mark
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Daniel Soderstrom <snaggs at mac.com> wrote:
I'm getting some sockets put in, and wanted to add a mmj compatible jack. Does anyone know a source for this?
Regards,
Daniel.
Sent from my iPad
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here
If you use a modular keystone system in your location, you'll want something like this:
http://www.iec.net/rj1106f-mtdcbk.html
The nice part of a system like this is that you can have a single plate and fill it with a bunch of differenct connectors - everything from cat5 ethernet, to cable tv, to BNC (great for your thin-net network).
Ian
On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote:
Google for "wallplate WP509". Assuming of course you meant wall plate, you want the WP509, MMJ wallplate. There are many sources, ranging from 5 to 15 bucks per piece.
-Mark
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Daniel Soderstrom <snaggs at mac.com> wrote:
I'm getting some sockets put in, and wanted to add a mmj compatible jack. Does anyone know a source for this?
Regards,
Daniel.
Sent from my iPad
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here
