HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

1 participants
15560 discussions

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-10-17 23:18, Mark Wickens wrote: On 17/10/2013 13:42, Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:37, Sampsa Laine wrote: sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 17 Oct 2013, at 14:36, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? It does hurt. Ah didn't know that - I'll turn it off when I get the chance in that case. TANSTAAFL Johnny /TNETENNBA/ <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=TNETENNBA> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsFAokXCxTI I totally did not get that. My comment was about the fact that logging is not free. Of course it costs you something. (performance being the obvious cost with computers) Which should be obvious by the general TANSTAAFL. Johnny

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 17/10/2013 13:42, Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:37, Sampsa Laine wrote: sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 17 Oct 2013, at 14:36, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? It does hurt. Ah didn't know that - I'll turn it off when I get the chance in that case. TANSTAAFL Johnny TNETENNBA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsFAokXCxTI -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-10-17 14:37, Sampsa Laine wrote: sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 17 Oct 2013, at 14:36, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? It does hurt. Ah didn't know that - I'll turn it off when I get the chance in that case. TANSTAAFL Johnny

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by sampsa＠mac.com

sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 17 Oct 2013, at 14:36, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-17 14:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? It does hurt. Ah didn't know that - I'll turn it off when I get the chance in that case. Sampsa

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-10-17 14:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? It does hurt. Johnny

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 17/10/2013 13:27, Sampsa Laine wrote: I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? sampsa It doesn't work for me (generally) when I have debugging on... Mark. -- -- Mark Wickens http://wickensonline.co.uk http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.org https://twitter.com/#!/@urbancamo HECNET: http://hecnet.eu, Email: HALO::MSW

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by sampsa＠mac.com

I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Why, does that kill the performance or? sampsa

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on tru64

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-10-16 22:47, Sampsa Laine wrote: On 16 Oct 2013, at 19:31, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-16 18:00, Sampsa Laine wrote: On 16 Oct 2013, at 17:18, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-10-16 11:57, Mark Wickens wrote: I am also taking a solaris box im presuming thatthe bridge would compile Ok on that? I have no reason to suspect it shouldn't work. But only testing will tell. And the same here - you might need to tweak a thing or two in the source. Johnny This got me thinking, could just customize a Raspian distro to run the bridge. Download the image, put it on a SD card and boot. Change network settings and enter uplink details in bridge.conf. bridge runs automatically in a screen launched by init (respawned if killed, of course). Instant HECnet-in-a-box :) Yes, apart that there is absolutely no reason to involve screen here. Kick the bridge from init. I like being able to watch the debug output in screen, but that's just me. Are you running with debug enabled??? Johnny

11 years, 8 months

HECnet bridge on Solaris 2.9

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-10-16 22:45, Mark Wickens wrote: Well, I managed to get the bridge compiled up on Solaris with some minor makefile and include and library tweaks having compiled up the latest libpcap. I am using the opencsw archive for general unix software. If I run the bridge with debug on I get the following output: ./bridge 4711 Config filename: bridge.conf Adding router ''local''. 0001187c:-4206648 Adding router ''update''. 82ee1319:4711 Adding DECnet bridge local. Trying to match local Matching against: local Found match: local == local Adding DECnet bridge update. Trying to match update Matching against: local Matching against: update Found match: update == update Adding LAT bridge local. Trying to match local Matching against: local Found match: local == local Adding LAT bridge update. Trying to match update Matching against: local Matching against: update Found match: update == update Host table: 0: local 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000) 1: update 130.238.19.25:4711 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000) Hash of known destinations: Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Setting existing hash to bridge 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Adding new hash entry. Port is 1 Which looks encouraging, but when I try and use DECNET on SLAVE I get the following: [MSW]SLAVE$ dir mim:: %DIRECT-E-OPENIN, error opening MIM::*.*;* as input -RMS-F-SYS, QIO system service request failed -SYSTEM-F-PATHLOST, path to network partner node lost Any ideas what might be going wrong? I've updated my NAT to point to the Ultra 5 for port 4711. Could you run a tcpdump on the network where the Sun is sitting. Dump the full ethernet headers. I have some vague memory of that you might not be able to set arbitrary source MAC addresses on packets sent on Sun machines, which would make it impossible to use the bridge... (Yes, DECnet nodes check that the source MAC address of received packets are consistent with what is expected, and refuse to get adjacency up if there is something wrong. Johnny Johnny

11 years, 8 months

Concerning that e-mail thing from HP that Ian is concerned with

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

Hello! Darned if I know why, but the blankety-blank thing arrived intact into my other e-mail box. One that is registered with their hobbyist outfit. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

11 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet