On 2015-02-11 20:27, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Coming today:
Images of SC-40 boot drives assuming they weren't 36-bit low-level
I don't think they are, but Peter Lothberg should have all the details, since he already have an SC40 on HECnet...
Johnny
On Feb 8, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2015-02-08 16:57, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
...
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
What does DC=No mean?
I think that is if it supports the CRC extension to DAP. It should either stand for DAP CRC, or Data Check. Pick one. :-)
And I guess RSTS/E do not support that.
Correct. There is a symbol for that flag in the code, but nothing references it.
paul
On 2015-02-08 16:57, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
What does DC=No mean?
I think that is if it supports the CRC extension to DAP. It should either stand for DAP CRC, or Data Check. Pick one. :-)
And I guess RSTS/E do not support that. I'm surprised TOPS-10 do, but it might be that the TOPS-10 DAP just answers with such an old format that RSX don't properly understand it, considering the odd information in the other fields.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2015-02-08 16:51, Steve Davidson wrote:
Johnny,
Try:
nft
pluto::[200,200]/id
.nft pluto::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
Johnny
-Steve
On Feb 8, 2015, at 08:09, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2015-02-07 15:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Ooops MacOS mail app is acting weird again. Somehow it has gone into a time warp and it is sending again old messages. Please disregard.
Interesting feature. :-)
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxt0"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V2 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 2404. OS=TOPS-20 FS=TOPS-20 DC=Yes
.nft bitxt1"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V0 DAP V7.0 Buffer size= 0. OS=TOPS-10 FS=TOPS-10 DC=Yes
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
.nft maisa::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V5 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 2064. OS=VAX/VMS FS=RMS-32 DC=Yes
.nft pondus::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2086. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=RMS-11 DC=Yes
.nft wxp::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 16384. OS=WindowsNT FS=NTFS DC=Yes
.
Johnny
El 23/04/2014, a les 20:00, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> va escriure:
El 23/04/2014, a les 11.16, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va :
I've been fixing some DECnet code in RSX, and I'm now looking for systems to check against.
What I'm testing is NFT/DAP access, and systems I'd like to test against is Ultrix-32, OSF-1, TOPS-20, RT-11, RSTS/E. Essentially anything not VMS or RSX. :-)
Do anyone have any such systems online on HECnet at the moment, which I can have file access to?
BITXT0: TOPS-20, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
BITXOT: RSTS/E, ACCOUNT=201,2, PASSWORD=GUESTGUEST
Additionally:
BITXT1: TOPS-10, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
I can put up a Ultrix-32 system if there is no other one available.
By the way, I didn't know there was DECNET for RT-11...
Do tou
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
It's AC only?
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Paul_Koning at Dell.com
Verzonden: zondag 8 februari 2015 16:57
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Looking for systems to test against...
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
What does DC=No mean?
paul
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
What does DC=No mean?
paul
Johnny,
Try:
nft
pluto::[200,200]/id
-Steve
On Feb 8, 2015, at 08:09, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2015-02-07 15:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Ooops MacOS mail app is acting weird again. Somehow it has gone into a time warp and it is sending again old messages. Please disregard.
Interesting feature. :-)
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxt0"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V2 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 2404. OS=TOPS-20 FS=TOPS-20 DC=Yes
.nft bitxt1"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V0 DAP V7.0 Buffer size= 0. OS=TOPS-10 FS=TOPS-10 DC=Yes
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
.nft maisa::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V5 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 2064. OS=VAX/VMS FS=RMS-32 DC=Yes
.nft pondus::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2086. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=RMS-11 DC=Yes
.nft wxp::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 16384. OS=WindowsNT FS=NTFS DC=Yes
.
Johnny
El 23/04/2014, a les 20:00, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> va escriure:
El 23/04/2014, a les 11.16, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va :
I've been fixing some DECnet code in RSX, and I'm now looking for systems to check against.
What I'm testing is NFT/DAP access, and systems I'd like to test against is Ultrix-32, OSF-1, TOPS-20, RT-11, RSTS/E. Essentially anything not VMS or RSX. :-)
Do anyone have any such systems online on HECnet at the moment, which I can have file access to?
BITXT0: TOPS-20, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
BITXOT: RSTS/E, ACCOUNT=201,2, PASSWORD=GUESTGUEST
Additionally:
BITXT1: TOPS-10, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
I can put up a Ultrix-32 system if there is no other one available.
By the way, I didn't know there was DECNET for RT-11...
Do tou
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2015-02-07 15:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Ooops MacOS mail app is acting weird again. Somehow it has gone into a time warp and it is sending again old messages. Please disregard.
Interesting feature. :-)
Anyway, this served as a reminder to me. Thanks for keeping those systems up. You do not see too many TOPS-10 or RSTS/E systems online. I just rechecked my fixed NFT on RSX, and it reports these systems just fine.
And for information, for anyone interested...
.nft bitxt0"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V2 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 2404. OS=TOPS-20 FS=TOPS-20 DC=Yes
.nft bitxt1"guest guest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V0 DAP V7.0 Buffer size= 0. OS=TOPS-10 FS=TOPS-10 DC=Yes
.nft bitxot"201,2 guestguest"::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4.1 DAP V5.6 Buffer size= 636. OS=RSTS/E FS=RMS-11 DC=No
.nft maisa::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V5 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 2064. OS=VAX/VMS FS=RMS-32 DC=Yes
.nft pondus::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2086. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=RMS-11 DC=Yes
.nft wxp::/id
NFT -- Version V9.0
Local NFARs V8 DAP V7.1 Buffer size= 2064. OS=RSX-11M+ FS=FCS-11 DC=Yes
Remote FAL V4 DAP V7.2 Buffer size= 16384. OS=WindowsNT FS=NTFS DC=Yes
.
Johnny
El 23/04/2014, a les 20:00, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> va escriure:
El 23/04/2014, a les 11.16, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va :
I've been fixing some DECnet code in RSX, and I'm now looking for systems to check against.
What I'm testing is NFT/DAP access, and systems I'd like to test against is Ultrix-32, OSF-1, TOPS-20, RT-11, RSTS/E. Essentially anything not VMS or RSX. :-)
Do anyone have any such systems online on HECnet at the moment, which I can have file access to?
BITXT0: TOPS-20, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
BITXOT: RSTS/E, ACCOUNT=201,2, PASSWORD=GUESTGUEST
Additionally:
BITXT1: TOPS-10, USER=GUEST, PASSWORD=GUEST
I can put up a Ultrix-32 system if there is no other one available.
By the way, I didn't know there was DECNET for RT-11...
Do tou
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
