I have ("somewhere") doccumentation for:
DEQNA
DELQA
DELQA-Plus
^^^^ (Original name by DEC)
I guess the latter is -YM,
The more modern ones can also be found in newer uVAX:en like 3500, but then with S-handles, perfect for a PDP 11-53, but most other chassies would require some mechanical work done to the PCB in order to remove handles...
Give me an E-mail shout if needed,
G ran
On 2012-06-19 16:52, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 06/19/2012 10:27 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Found 1 DELQA and 4 DEQNA (condition unknown), and also have 1 broken
DELQA
I recall that the DELQA is more "modern" and better i some way, are they
also more prone to failure?
No. From a reliability point of view, I've not heard that either should
be better or worse. However, the DEQNA is rather buggy in its general
performance.
Side-by-side, the DELQA is quite a bit faster than the DEQNA, the
DELQA-YA ("Turbo DELQA") even more so.
That said, the DELQA has a "DEQNA compatibility mode"...whether that
makes it as slow and/or buggy as the DEQNA, I don't know.
-Dave
On 20 Jun 2012, at 22:42, H Vlems wrote:
Sampsa, I've been using a BB for 6 or 7 years now. At the time there was
just no alternative. For business use it's still great. If you want more
than that, right, get an iPhone or an Andoid based platform.
Hans
BTW I think thi is my last Blackberry becuase I feel that when this contract
expires RIM will be down the drain. What would you suggest, Apple or Android
platform?
Again, if I'd never used an iPhone before that, then yeah, I would've probably been OK with the BB.
As for me, I use an iPhone (have since 2007) so am biased but very happy with it - in fact I've got an iPad as well and the new iMessage (basically BBM built into the text messaging app) is great - I get the same messages on my Mac, iPad and iPhone, all for free.
Sampsa
That's a bit of a loaded question, actually. :)
It's all going to come down to personal preference so I'd say go get your hands on both to play with.
I've always found the iPhone to have a bit more of a polished UI but I haven't had any real hands on with android in years so that could no longer be true.
-brian
On Jun 20, 2012, at 15:42, "H Vlems" <hvlems at zonnet.nl> wrote:
Sampsa, I've been using a BB for 6 or 7 years now. At the time there was
just no alternative. For business use it's still great. If you want more
than that, right, get an iPhone or an Andoid based platform.
Hans
BTW I think thi is my last Blackberry becuase I feel that when this contract
expires RIM will be down the drain. What would you suggest, Apple or Android
platform?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Sampsa Laine
Verzonden: woensdag, juni 2012 21:33
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Psilo status?
On 20 Jun 2012, at 22:27, Dennis Boone wrote:
Hans' blackberry may be set to latin1, given he's in .nl.
On a related note, I got a blackberry for about a month since all my "cool
kid" buddies were bugging me to get on BBM. Threw it under a bus after a
month, those things SUCK.
Sampsa
Sampsa, I've been using a BB for 6 or 7 years now. At the time there was
just no alternative. For business use it's still great. If you want more
than that, right, get an iPhone or an Andoid based platform.
Hans
BTW I think thi is my last Blackberry becuase I feel that when this contract
expires RIM will be down the drain. What would you suggest, Apple or Android
platform?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Sampsa Laine
Verzonden: woensdag, juni 2012 21:33
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Psilo status?
On 20 Jun 2012, at 22:27, Dennis Boone wrote:
Hans' blackberry may be set to latin1, given he's in .nl.
On a related note, I got a blackberry for about a month since all my "cool
kid" buddies were bugging me to get on BBM. Threw it under a bus after a
month, those things SUCK.
Sampsa
OK, we're getting somewhere ;-)
Unfortunately this is not wriiten on my (t)rusty blackberry.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Peter Lothberg
Verzonden: woensdag, juni 2012 23:33
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
CC: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] 7 bit ASCII test
Peter, can you read this text on the PDP-10?
Hans
YES!!!!!!!
Thanks!
--Peter
Peter,
having used TOPS-10 for a short period, I know very little about TOPS-10 but
understand your problem (at least I think I do). So I'm trying to find a
solution.
Hans
The TOPS-10 system IIRC was in Ireland and was used by a European technology
sponsorship program. Contenders and participants had to use tha tsystem for
progress reports and project funding requests.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Peter Lothberg
Verzonden: woensdag, juni 2012 23:09
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
CC: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Psilo status?
It is plain ascii, 8 bits and no problem for my own vms
systems. Besides there's no option to modify on my
blackberry. It also enforces topposting to my despair.
Apologies. I"ll drop off the list.
As Johnny points out, it's not critisim of you or your contributions
(well, I can't read them).
My point is that a lot of the HECNet hosts don't speak 8-bit
characters. All the 36bit machines does 5*7bit=35bit to store ASCII.
So it would be nice if I could follow the HECnet mailinglist on my
HECnet machine, that;a all, thanks, Peter.
--Peter
Dennis,
if all else fails then that would be a very nice idea indeed, thanks!
But I'm an engineer. Engineers try to fix things that are broken.
They'd rather not pass the problem to somebody else <g>
Hans
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Dennis Boone
Verzonden: woensdag, juni 2012 21:27
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Psilo status?
Peter is correct: it really is encoded as Base64. Why is not clear; the
Mime header says that it's text/plain, but in spite of that it sets
transfer-encoding to base64. Maybe just a defective mail client.
It says text/plain, but doesn't name the character set. Some mailers
switch to base64 if the character set isn't ASCII, even if all of the
characters that actually appear in the message would be legit ascii.
Hans' blackberry may be set to latin1, given he's in .nl.
Hans, if you want, I'll try to gin up a gateway that translates your
messages and posts them to the list. Shame to see you leave the list
over this kind of tomfoolery.
De
On 20 Jun 2012, at 22:27, Dennis Boone wrote:
Hans' blackberry may be set to latin1, given he's in .nl.
On a related note, I got a blackberry for about a month since all my "cool kid" buddies were bugging me to get on BBM. Threw it under a bus after a month, those things SUCK.
Sampsa
