It doesn't really matter I don't think. The OpenVPN config file is the same no matter where you use it.
-brian
On 8/8/2012 10:50 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
I can run it from both an OS X box or Linux?
Which is easier to configure?
Sampsa
On 8 Aug 2012, at 16:55, Brian Hechinger wrote:
I should have some time today. Let me take a quick look at it and see. I can simulate your setup so I can test it here before passing it off to you
-brian
On 8/8/2012 9:19 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Brian,
When would be a good time to set up this OpenVPN thing for you?
Let me know.
Sampsa
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:43, Sampsa Laine wrote:
I'm game - never set it up on a Linux box before, though
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:13, Brian Hechinger wrote:
A possible option would be to setup an OpenVPN tunnel somewhere to go through. Maybe not pretty, but it'll work.
If you want to try that email me off list and we can set it up on my colo box.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:00, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Sampsa
I should have some time today. Let me take a quick look at it and see. I can simulate your setup so I can test it here before passing it off to you
-brian
On 8/8/2012 9:19 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Brian,
When would be a good time to set up this OpenVPN thing for you?
Let me know.
Sampsa
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:43, Sampsa Laine wrote:
I'm game - never set it up on a Linux box before, though
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:13, Brian Hechinger wrote:
A possible option would be to setup an OpenVPN tunnel somewhere to go through. Maybe not pretty, but it'll work.
If you want to try that email me off list and we can set it up on my colo box.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:00, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Sampsa
You can also use a pair of VDE plugs tunneled over SSH. That's what I use to hook simulators running in my laptop over an iPhohe tethered connection. It's a little bit convoluted to set up, but it works wonderfully.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
Hello!
Sounds interesting. Can you point me to something?
Sure! I wrote about it in my blog.
http://ancientbits.blogspot.com.es/2012/06/simh-39-using-vde-for-fun-and.ht…
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
<jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
El 06/08/2012, a les 22:18, Paul_Koning at Dell.com va escriure:
Ethernet tunneling over TCP seems reasonable enough, even though the TCP connection/ack machinery is pure overhead for this application. SSL could be used if security is needed -- is that important?
For people who have port number limitations (censoring ISPs) I wonder if tunneling over HTTP should be defined. :-), sort of.
You can also use a pair of VDE plugs tunneled over SSH. That's what I use to hook simulators running in my laptop over an iPhohe tethered connection. It's a little bit convoluted to set up, but it works wonderfully.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
Hello!
Sounds interesting. Can you point me to something?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
El 06/08/2012, a les 22:18, Paul_Koning at Dell.com va escriure:
Ethernet tunneling over TCP seems reasonable enough, even though the TCP connection/ack machinery is pure overhead for this application. SSL could be used if security is needed -- is that important?
For people who have port number limitations (censoring ISPs) I wonder if tunneling over HTTP should be defined. :-), sort of.
You can also use a pair of VDE plugs tunneled over SSH. That's what I use to hook simulators running in my laptop over an iPhohe tethered connection. It's a little bit convoluted to set up, but it works wonderfully.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
HI,
Does anyone have layered products for Ultrix 4.5 Vax, or layered
products for an older version + OS.
The last email I saw was 3 years ago offering the disks. Did anyone
make a copy ?
Thanks
Dan
My father asked me to document some stuff that his house network (bigish place, 400 sq m, patch panel, 48 port switch, 4 WLANs etc and a routed 3G connection to the outside).
Here's an excerpt:
-- Draytek won't reset, no LEDs come on etc. --
"Jim, it's dead"
Basically, the router has gone to meet God, as-salaamu alayhu wa rahmatu-Allah.
Buy a new router (model Vigor 2830).
Install it and follow the steps from "Nope, it's all still fucked"
On 2012-08-05 19:02, Mark Benson wrote:
The following nodes have changed name on Area 6 (not that anyone can see then right now ^_^)
6.51 DARMOK
6.54 JALAD
Updated on MIM.
Johnny
Neither have I. Only on openbsd and Solaris here. Should be easy though. I'll email you tomorrow.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:43, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
I'm game - never set it up on a Linux box before, though
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:13, Brian Hechinger wrote:
A possible option would be to setup an OpenVPN tunnel somewhere to go through. Maybe not pretty, but it'll work.
If you want to try that email me off list and we can set it up on my colo box.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:00, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Sampsa
