L.S.
Anf10 ethernet and sync lines are 2 separate domains and currently there are no standard interconnections.
The (now late) Johnny Ericsson had an Anf10 tunnel but I never tried it.
On a KL10 with dte interface a certain routing should be possible, but that cannot yet be done
I also restored a DN200 Pdp11 simh workstation (see Anfu63) with terminals and peripherals with remote printing, plotting etc.
The network looks like this from the multi kdp/dup node with 2 decnet and 2 anf10 active:
.net/t
[ANF10 network: connected to ANFW08(57), located at ANFW08(57), 5 nodes]
Node ANFW04 (53) 77(8), 55(8), 54(8)
Node ANFW05 (54) 77(8), 53(8)
Node ANFW06 (55) 77(8), 53(8)
Node ANFW08 (57) 77(10)
Node ANFU63 (77) 53(6), 54(6), 55(6), 57(6)
[DECnet network: local node SWBW08, 8 reachable nodes in area 63]
Name Number Line Cost Hops L.Links Delay
SWBC01 (63.50) KDP-0-0 7 1
SWBV89 (63.89) KDP-0-0 7 1
SWBW01 (63.51) KDP-0-0 11 2
SWBW04 (63.54) KDP-0-0 12 2
SWBW05 (63.55) KDP-0-1 7 1
SWBW06 (63.56) KDP-0-0 12 2
SWBW08 (63.58) local 0 0 0 5000
SWBX01 (63.41) KDP-0-0 11 2
.net
[ANF10 network: connected to ANFW08(57), located at ANFW08(57), 5 nodes]
Node ANFW04 (53) Swbw04 Tops10-7.07/34201 01-aug-20
Node ANFW05 (54) Swbw05 Tops10-7.07/34201 01-aug-20
Node ANFW06 (55) Swbw06 Tops10-7.07/34201 16-jul-20
Node ANFW08 (57) SwbW08 Tops10-7.06/34100 27-Jul-20
Node ANFU63 (77) DN200 V25(244) 02-Aug-89
[DECnet network: local node SWBW08, 8 reachable nodes in area 63]
SWBC01 SWBV89 SWBW01 SWBW04 SWBW05 SWBW06 SWBW08 SWBX01
Reindert
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of G.
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November, 2021 21:36
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] ANF10 network
> It was not full mesh. ANF10 has routing with metrics like DECnet and
> RDH even wrote a driver to talk over Ethernet between KL's.
If anyone is curious, here below is a link to the ANF-to-Ethernet code by RDH.
It contains some nice explanation too :)
http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/bb-jr93k-bb/01/10,7/mon/d8eint.mac.html
G.
L.S.
It is quite easy to expand this; currently I run 8 lines from the Kdp/dup
and it works quite well.
It needs a slight adaptation in Simh and another in Tops10, but you have to
rebuild the monitor.
Reindert
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf
Of Robert Armstrong
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November, 2021 17:34
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] ANF10 network
Supratim and I (with some help and encouragement from Peter) have set up
an ANF10 network between the TOPS10 nodes VENTI and TWONKY. If you haven't
heard of it, ANF10 (short for "A Networking Feature" - yes, really!)
predates DECnet (I'm pretty sure, although I'm sure there will be debate
about that) and provides mostly the same functions - remote terminals, file
transfer, etc. ANF10 also has remote RJEs with card readers, line printers
and terminal concentrators.
.net/anf
[ANF10 network: connected to VENTI(20), located at VENTI(20), 2 nodes]
Node VENTI (20) SIMH KS10 VENTI 7.04 NET 14-Nov-21
Node TWONKY (37) SIMH KS10 TWONKY 7.04NET 15-Nov-21
It's possible to run ANF10 and DECnet both, and that's what we're doing so
TWONKY and VENTI are also available on HECnet. If anybody else has a TOPS10
system and would like to connect it would be nice to add a few more nodes,
but there is a problem. TOPS10 supports a maximum of two KDP/DUP lines on
the KS10, and you need one for DECnet and the other for ANF10. That means
each system can talk to at most one other ANF10 system, which limits the
network size to two nodes. Bummer.
There are a few options available -
* DEC made some DNxx PDP-11 boxes that supported multiple ANF10
connections. We could set up one of these as a router.
* Somebody could hack TOPS10 to allow more than two DUP lines.
* Somebody could write a pyDECnet type gizmo that speaks ANF10.
And there might be others that I haven't thought of yet. Any ideas?
Bob
Johnny's FIX.T20 HECnet node list works on TOPS-10 as well (same NCP, same
commands), BUT there's an issue.
What you'd really like to do is to put something like "TAKE HECNET.CMD"
inside of [1,4]SYSTEM.CMD. The latter is executed automatically at boot
time and this would let you define all HECnet nodes when you start up.
However OPR (at least the version with TOPS-10 7.04) doesn't allow nested
TAKE commands, so the "TAKE HECNET." inside of SYSTEM.CMD fails.
Has somebody figured out a trick to get around this?
Bob
I was doing some more Kermit-20 measurements while I continue to debug
the NRT code.
Again, the fastest transfer rate that I could get out of a loopback
pseudo-terminal connection was 129.16 KBps with a packet size of 140
characters (note previous post was in baud) .? Since this is not going
outside of the PDP-10, one assumes that it would either be the top speed
possible or near it as we are just talking shuttling data between buffers.
I did a transfer of the same file to an iMac and was /very/ surprised to
find that I got 4,000 byte packet size and a transfer rate 151.78 KBps.?
That's right, using the NI resulted in a speed _increase_ of 17%.? I
instrumented Kermit to report the allocated monitor buffers by line type
and got the table below from various sign ons, viz:
? TTY line Type:?? FE?? PTY? NRT? TVT? CTM
? Input Buffers:??? 1??? 1??? 1??? 1??? 1
? Output Buffers:?? 2??? 1??? 2??? 4??? 2
The abbreviations are as follows:
* ?FE, Front End (RSX-20F) terminal (there is only one, CTY)
* PTY, Pseudo-terminal
* NRT, DECnet Network Remote Terminal
* TVT, Internet Telnet Virtual Terminal
* CTM, DECnet CTERM (I forget what CTERM abbreviates to)
* LAT, Local Area Terminal (I don't currently have a working transport
and client for this)
So what we can see is that a TVT has four _times_ the buffers to play
with than the PTY.? I don't currently know how large a terminal buffer
is nor what else this might mean, but it is suggestive.
For what it's worth, I also did comparison with FTP.? A data transfer in
the RFC959 paradigm is acknowledged on the control channel with return
code of 226.? There are no acknowledgements of the data channel; it's a
straight fire hose.? As I expected, an FTP transfer blew Kermit right
out of the water.? For the same sized file, the 20 measured an upload
data rate of 1.09 *M*Bps with a 10 microsecond resolution (from first
network write to return from closing the transfer 'socket').? The iMac
measured 1.25 *M*Bps download.
So it would appear that an FTP transfer is about 7.38 times faster,
which is of interest, but otherwise perhaps irrelevant as they are not
even remotely doing the same thing.? One expects the same result for
DAP, once I get FTP up on that transport.? Again, we're not comparing
apples to apples.
My network scanner is getting very strange responses from three different nodes all misbehaving the same way: CAIR, MAGPIE, and FARGO.
What I see is:
1. The connection to object 19 (NICE, the network management listener) is accepted, but the version number that is supposed to be sent as part of the accept is missing.
2. When I send a NICE request to the node, I get back a message with this content:
<28>Nov 12 20:35:16 dnetd[1688]: Cannot chdir to /nonexistent : No such file or directory\n\xff\x00\x00
All three nodes do this. Configuration error that just happens to exist on all three?
paul
With the recent talk about the magic 9-Nov-2021 date affecting TOPS-10, I
notice today that
my RSTS/E V10.1 system has started putting out console messages -
?EVTLOG (BLDNIC) -- %Integer error
I'm running this on my PiPDP-11 which uses the Oscar modified SIMH PDP11
11/70 emulation.
It's 10-Nov-2021 in Australia!
I'm running the Paul Koning's updated Y2K version of EVTLOG from
https://github.com/pkoning2/decstuff/tree/master/decnete
Any ideas? I've tried rebooting and the message appears after start-up has
completed, and at shutdown when the date is set to 10-Nov-21 - but not when
use yesterday's date 9-Nov-21
Tony
--
Tony Nicholson <tony.nicholson at computer.org>
. not date related this time (or at least I don't think it is).
Every time I boot TOPS-10 (7.04, KS10, simh) I get stopcode NTMNEC. The
job running is NML and the user PC is 511522. This is a debug stopcode so
the system keeps going.
The manual says of NTMNEC - "Some routine took the non-skip return, but
did not give an error code by calling NTExxx. This means that the program
returned to top level and field NXERR was zero. Determine which
routine is failing, and make the error return give an error code."
Has anybody else seen this? Is there a patch? It's getting a bit
annoying, not to mention that it keeps crash dumping.
Thanks,
Bob
I needed to have a separate transport mechanism for testing both the
Tops-10 and Tops-20 FAL, NFT and DAP implementations.? I wanted to be
able to compare files to make sure I hadn't messed anything up.? I also
thought that a speed comparison might perhaps be of interest, but
otherwise not directly useful.
I've modified K20MIT to be able to transfer files both over DECnet
Network Remote Terminals and pseudo-terminals.? I did the
pseudo-terminal part first so I could debug the alternate line code more
easily without having any DECnet issues getting in the way.? Once I'm
satisfied that Kermit will transfer over a non-physical line, I can rule
out any problems I have debugging the DECnet code.? In other words, I'll
know that, whatever issue I bump into, it will be reasonable to assume
that it is related to NRT transport and not anything Kermit is doing.
Right now, a lot of sparks have come flying out because I am taking code
that is nearly 40 years old that grew up dealing with with a DH11 front
end line and wrenching it into using virtual terminals.? However,
earlier this evening, I had my first pseudo-terminal transfer.? The file
was the ASCII text for Ralph Gorin's "Introduction to Assembler Language
Programming" book. This is about 1.5 megabytes long and takes up 621
pages on disk, which I imagined would be a 'reasonable' size.?? Kermit
says it clocked about 815 Kbps doing the transfer, but I really wouldn't
have any idea what that number means.? A FILCOM shows that the files
match to the byte, which is the important part.? Details below.
??? ?T
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kermit-20>*connect* [KERMIT-20: Loopback connection to VENTI2:: via
PTY7: using TTY22:, type <CTRL-\>C to return.] Kermit-20>*set delay 15*
Kermit-20>*server* Kermit Server running on DEC-20 host. Please type
your escape sequence to return to your local machine. Shut down the
server by typing the BYE command to KERMIT on your local machine.
[KERMIT-20: Returning to local system, VENTI2::] Kermit-20>*show line*
TTY for file transfer: 22 (assigned TTY line, KERMIT-20 is _LOCAL_)
Handshake: None Flow-Control: XON-XOFF Parity: None Duplex: Full Speed:
(Unknown) Break Simulation: Disabled TVT Binary: On TVT Negotiate:
Automatic Log: (none) Kermit-20>*cwd ps:<slogin>* [Connected to
TOMMYT:<SLOGIN>] Kermit-20>*send doc:tops20_ASSEMBLER_PROGRAMMING.TXT.1
(as) * Kermit-20>*statistics* Maximum number of characters in packet: 80
received; 80 sent Number of characters transmitted in 19 seconds Sent:
1711619 Overhead: 124378 Received: 138712 Overhead: 138712 Total:
1850331 Overhead: 263090 Total characters transmitted per second: 97385
Effective data rate: _835390_ bps ILDB: 0 SIN: 0 SIN Max: 0 BIN: 138712
Interpacket pause in effect: 0 sec Timeouts: 0 NAKs: 0 Kermit-20>*push*
[KERMIT-20: PUSHing to new EXEC.] [POP from Exec to return.] @*vdir
/since today* TOMMYT:<SLOGIN> TOPS20_ASSEMBLER_PROGRAMMING.TXT.1;P774200
621 1587241(7) 13-Nov-2021 17:29:35 SLOGIN Total of 621 pages in 1 file
@*defINE f1: (AS) doc:tops20_ASSEMBLER_PROGRAMMING.TXT.0 * @*defINE f2:
(AS) h:tops20_aSSEMBLER_PROGRAMMING.TXT.0* @*filcom* **tty:=f1:,f2:* _No
differences encountered_ **^Z* @
As shipped, the Tops-20 FAL does not implement the idea of a default
account.? So you can't use it unless you have something valid to type
into the user and password fields.? I changed all that and the candidate
implementation has been up on VENTI2:: for a few days to allow Bob to
pull some Kermit-10 sources that I got from the Kermit project.
This is tested code, yet something between maybe an alpha and beta
version with debugging hooks, Etc.
I noted that some have people used it, which I think is *great!* If you
bump into any problems or thing something doesn't work right, please
drop me a note.? Recall that Tops-20 DAP does not implement RENAME
(which I don't allow in anonymous, anyway)
If you want the Kermit-10 sources, then you want to use the K10MIT:
system logical, viz: VENTI2::K10MIT:*.* will show you the goodies.