On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
After disabling parity this is what it does consistently.
@004620/000776
Do I have a bad memory board? It's far, far too late to return this one...
With parity disabled and RSTS/E:
https://ghostbin.com/paste/ksd3c a bad ~50K? I can disable everything above 512kByte which is...i forget how many words.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
After disabling parity this is what it does consistently.
@004620/000776
Do I have a bad memory board? It's far, far too late to return this one...
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Great, now you are set. Sorry for not answering quickly enough!
To answer your question; it depends on the configuration.
With DECnet Phase IV a cluster member should be a routing node. With DECnet Phase V you should have a router in the same LAN (and Area, of course).
Kari
On 22.5.2014 12:25, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
El 22/05/2014, a les 11.08, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> va escriure:
El 22/05/2014, a les 9.27, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure:
For the DECnet cluster alias you need (at least) one routing node (L1) or a router.
Does any of the cluster nodes have routing enabled?
I hqve a L1 router and an area router in the same LAN. Is that enough, or should I enable routing in one of the cluster members?
Answering to myself: yes, enabling the boot member as L1 router fixed the thing and now the cluster alias is visible and accessible. Thanks!
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
.
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-22 11:26, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What the hell?
boot [1,54]RSX11M.SYS
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
***EXEC PARITY ERROR STOP***
025746
@025746/000310
Uh. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense...
That sounds like a memory parity error to me...
I was just skimming through the memory board's manual for its parity settings to see if perhaps it was disabled. Or enabled.
Doesn't look like there's a jumper for that. :(
Perhaps I have the model without parity...
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-22 11:26, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What the hell?
boot [1,54]RSX11M.SYS
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
***EXEC PARITY ERROR STOP***
025746
@025746/000310
Uh. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense...
That sounds like a memory parity error to me...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What the hell?
boot [1,54]RSX11M.SYS
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
***EXEC PARITY ERROR STOP***
025746
@025746/000310
Uh. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense...
During initial boot of baseline:
SET /CRASHDEV=MM0:
00:01:39 Task "LOAT0 " terminated
Reserved inst execution
R0=140134
R1=000000
R2=000000
R3=000000
R4=001100
R5=060630
SP=120400
PC=140162
PS=170010
SET -- Crash device MM000: has been successfully loaded
SYSGEN log:
https://ghostbin.com/paste/z2z28
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-22 11:21, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, I'm not finding a whole lot of documentation on this...
Can ZRQCH0 be used to format disks when the CSR isn't the default? Does
it prompt for them during formatting? Will I have to shove my SCSI
controller to a different address temporarily?
I have a worksheet detailing how to patch ZRQCH0 to format unsupported
geometries so upon getting XXDP booted I can FINALLY use one of my
drives...which will finally allow me to boot RT-11 on the 11/03 from an
old CMI drive...if it even still works. ;)
Unless I remember wrong, the tool asks for the CSR.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What the hell?
boot [1,54]RSX11M.SYS
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=042714 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000110
CRASH -- CRASH DRIVER NOT LOADED
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
***EXEC PARITY ERROR STOP***
025746
@025746/000310
Uh. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense...
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
El 22/05/2014, a les 11.08, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> va escriure:
El 22/05/2014, a les 9.27, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure:
For the DECnet cluster alias you need (at least) one routing node (L1) or a router.
Does any of the cluster nodes have routing enabled?
I hqve a L1 router and an area router in the same LAN. Is that enough, or should I enable routing in one of the cluster members?
Answering to myself: yes, enabling the boot member as L1 router fixed the thing and now the cluster alias is visible and accessible. Thanks!
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
Okay, I'm not finding a whole lot of documentation on this...
Can ZRQCH0 be used to format disks when the CSR isn't the default? Does it prompt for them during formatting? Will I have to shove my SCSI controller to a different address temporarily?
I have a worksheet detailing how to patch ZRQCH0 to format unsupported geometries so upon getting XXDP booted I can FINALLY use one of my drives...which will finally allow me to boot RT-11 on the 11/03 from an old CMI drive...if it even still works. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
