On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Okay. Built FCSRES et al and it worked properly this time in SIMH. I
configured it identically to the real hardware (including DHV11) so I
can just stage it right to the real thing.
Ok. Sounds like you might have properly built the system this time... Let's hope. :-)
It managed to sav /wb fine. It finished copying to the cluster boot node. once I finish my sandwich I'll go pop the MVII in and start the copy.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-25 09:49, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Details, please... :-)
What errors are you seeing/getting?
First: it still complained about supervisor mode issues, it didn't
first successful build.
Second: undefined symbols I didn't need to define first success.
Third: SAV not found
Fourth: index file full.
The simulator also kept randomly HALTing...
Johnny
Okay. Built FCSRES et al and it worked properly this time in SIMH. I
configured it identically to the real hardware (including DHV11) so I
can just stage it right to the real thing.
Ok. Sounds like you might have properly built the system this time... Let's hope. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I meant 08-00-2B-AA-BB-01...
All those dashes are hell to type on a smartphone :-)
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Jean-Yves Bernier
Verzonden: zaterdag 24 mei 2014 23:51
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Same MAC address on different nodes
At 11:18 PM +0200 24/5/14, Hans Vlems wrote:
The DIX spec says that hardware addresses ( the ones you put in the
simh configuration file starting with 08-00-2B) must be unique .
I put no address in my simh conf file.
I tried to change it to -AA-BB-01 as you suggested above. I have now
lost ssh access to my emulator and figure how to clear my ARP cache
(arp -d -a wont 't do it under OS X).
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Details, please... :-)
What errors are you seeing/getting?
First: it still complained about supervisor mode issues, it didn't first successful build.
Second: undefined symbols I didn't need to define first success.
Third: SAV not found
Fourth: index file full.
The simulator also kept randomly HALTing...
Johnny
Okay. Built FCSRES et al and it worked properly this time in SIMH. I configured it identically to the real hardware (including DHV11) so I can just stage it right to the real thing.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Details, please... :-)
What errors are you seeing/getting?
First: it still complained about supervisor mode issues, it didn't first successful build.
Second: undefined symbols I didn't need to define first success.
Third: SAV not found
Fourth: index file full.
The simulator also kept randomly HALTing...
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-25 09:36, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-25 09:21, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
17:09:44 24-MAY-14
;
TKB @RSXBLD
I don't recall it getting to this stage before!
Cool. So how many things did you have to fix in the end, and how/where
did you fix them?
I defined 3 undefined symbols in SGNPREFIX.CMD
However...now its failing in legitimately random ways in SIMH. No
failure is consistent. :(
Failing how?
Errors I didn't get before. I did a successful SYSGEN...then it started
hitting errors I hadn't hit before.
Details, please... :-)
What errors are you seeing/getting?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-25 09:21, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
17:09:44 24-MAY-14
;
TKB @RSXBLD
I don't recall it getting to this stage before!
Cool. So how many things did you have to fix in the end, and how/where
did you fix them?
I defined 3 undefined symbols in SGNPREFIX.CMD
However...now its failing in legitimately random ways in SIMH. No
failure is consistent. :(
Failing how?
Errors I didn't get before. I did a successful SYSGEN...then it started hitting errors I hadn't hit before.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-25 09:21, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
17:09:44 24-MAY-14
;
TKB @RSXBLD
I don't recall it getting to this stage before!
Cool. So how many things did you have to fix in the end, and how/where
did you fix them?
I defined 3 undefined symbols in SGNPREFIX.CMD
However...now its failing in legitimately random ways in SIMH. No
failure is consistent. :(
Failing how?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-25 00:53, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Looks like rebuilding the tasks without FCSFSL and FCSRES fixes it.
tested in SIMH so building on real hardware now.
Yeah. Not sure how you managed to get things built with the supervisor mode libraries. But obviously that would not work.
The problem was that I DIDN'T build any. ;) Didn't occur to me they'd be shipped needing split I&D.
Anyway. You really should build the RES versions though, since those are the normal shared libraries, and it saves on memory when you are running.
Thanks. I wasn't sure what options I should've used.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-25 00:53, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Looks like rebuilding the tasks without FCSFSL and FCSRES fixes it.
tested in SIMH so building on real hardware now.
Yeah. Not sure how you managed to get things built with the supervisor mode libraries. But obviously that would not work.
Anyway. You really should build the RES versions though, since those are the normal shared libraries, and it saves on memory when you are running.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
