"H Vlems" <hvlems at zonnet.nl> writes:
Brian, I've two Adaptec controllers: - aha-2940/w/2940uw - aha-2944uw
They're not supported by VMS (IIRC). Not supported doesn't mean won't
work. Is there a way to let VMS use them? Hans
First, plug them in and see. If VMS can detect them, it will configure
the driver for and use them. You may need to add some device specific-
ation to SYS$SYSTEM:SYS$USER_CONFIG.DAT for this to happen. It will all
depend upon what chips are used on those controller. DEC did rebrand a
few Adaptec devices as well.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
Stuart Martin <wavey at wavey.org> writes:
I couldn't be happier with the DS10L's performance (mine is the one
Rob's been using). It does make a little too much noise, but even the
missus has become used to it being on the whole time in our study. It
also running with a shadowset on the system disk, which does noticeably
slow it down.
I don't find the DS10L I have here to be too onerously loud. It's extremely
quiet compared to some other kit here.
A shadow set system disk should not slow things down. What disks have
you combined to form this shadow set? If you want to slow it down, put
the system on an IDE which the DS10L provides support for!!!
I'd like an itanium, but I haven't heard of one which is reasonable
enough on the power front to warrant being on for extended periods of
time. The DS10L is around 180W, which is not *too* bad.
I'll have to plug in my watt meter and see just how much my Itaniums do
actually consume; however, bang (CPU speed) for the buck (power use), I
would wager that the Itanium is better.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
There are two scsi controllers on the pci bus and one of them is named PKD0. So I knew there had to be a PKB and PKC somewhere. I just located them on the motherboard... Never noticed them before!
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Oleg Safiullin
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] My newest toy -SCSISE adapter
Verzonden: 13 januari 2013 11:09
H Vlems wrote:
Brian,
I've two Adaptec controllers:
- aha-2940/w/2940uw
- aha-2944uw
They're not supported by VMS (IIRC). Not supported doesn't mean won't work.
Is there a way to let VMS use them?
Hans
I'm using aha-2940uw adapter on my DS10.
You need to add the following lines to SYS$SYSTEM:SYS$USER_CONFIG.DAT:
--- cut here ---
device = "Adaptec AHA-2940UW"
name = PK
driver = sys$pkadriver.exe
adapter = PCI
id = 0x81789004
boot_class = DK
boot_flags = HW_CTRL_LTR, UNIT_0
flags = SCSI, PORT, BOOT
end_device
--- cut here ---
Also I have patched OVMS 8.4 CD which supports this adapter.
Thanks Oleg!
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Oleg Safiullin
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] My newest toy -SCSISE adapter
Verzonden: 13 januari 2013 11:09
H Vlems wrote:
Brian,
I've two Adaptec controllers:
- aha-2940/w/2940uw
- aha-2944uw
They're not supported by VMS (IIRC). Not supported doesn't mean won't work.
Is there a way to let VMS use them?
Hans
I'm using aha-2940uw adapter on my DS10.
You need to add the following lines to SYS$SYSTEM:SYS$USER_CONFIG.DAT:
--- cut here ---
device = "Adaptec AHA-2940UW"
name = PK
driver = sys$pkadriver.exe
adapter = PCI
id = 0x81789004
boot_class = DK
boot_flags = HW_CTRL_LTR, UNIT_0
flags = SCSI, PORT, BOOT
end_device
--- cut here ---
Also I have patched OVMS 8.4 CD which supports this adapter.
H Vlems wrote:
Brian, I've two Adaptec controllers:
- aha-2940/w/2940uw
- aha-2944uw
They're not supported by VMS (IIRC). Not supported doesn't mean won't work.
Is there a way to let VMS use them?
Hans
I'm using aha-2940uw adapter on my DS10.
You need to add the following lines to SYS$SYSTEM:SYS$USER_CONFIG.DAT:
--- cut here ---
device = "Adaptec AHA-2940UW"
name = PK
driver = sys$pkadriver.exe
adapter = PCI
id = 0x81789004
boot_class = DK
boot_flags = HW_CTRL_LTR, UNIT_0
flags = SCSI, PORT, BOOT
end_device
--- cut here ---
Also I have patched OVMS 8.4 CD which supports this adapter.
Brian,
I've two Adaptec controllers:
- aha-2940/w/2940uw
- aha-2944uw
They're not supported by VMS (IIRC). Not supported doesn't mean won't work.
Is there a way to let VMS use them?
Hans
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-
Verzonden: zondag, januari 2013 0:31
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] My newest toy
hvlems at zonnet.nl writes:
Single Ended, 68 pin connector. It's a DDR4 HP storageworks DAT 40. i
don't want to use my last spare KZPCM for it ... ------Origineel
One of the Qlogic 1020 or 1040 based KZP should be easy and cheap to find.
You don't want the KZPBA-CB though as it's HVD.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 13 January 2013 09:34, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Jan 2013, at 00:39, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
> "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> writes:
>
>> I have just been logging on to someone else's DS10L today to work on my
>> DECnet router. It is the first time I have used one of these and it
>> seems really fast to me. I want one now.....
>
> And Integrity boxes are even faster.
For the amount of electricity they use they sodding well ought to be too!!
I couldn't be happier with the DS10L's performance (mine is the one Rob's been using). It does make a little too much noise, but even the missus has become used to it being on the whole time in our study. It also running with a shadowset on the system disk, which does noticeably slow it down.
I'd like an itanium, but I haven't heard of one which is reasonable enough on the power front to warrant being on for extended periods of time. The DS10L is around 180W, which is not *too* bad.
On 13 Jan 2013, at 00:39, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
"Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> writes:
I have just been logging on to someone else's DS10L today to work on my
DECnet router. It is the first time I have used one of these and it
seems really fast to me. I want one now.....
And Integrity boxes are even faster.
For the amount of electricity they use they sodding well ought to be too!!
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On 12 Jan 2013, at 21:48, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/12/2013 07:57 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I never found use for a graphics head on that class of boxes.
I don't have anything that can handle MMJ and no local place would sell a null modem cable.
I'll make you an MMJ cable when we get together.
Okay! Thanks!
Btw, I solved the problem with being unable to use it by going in to conversational boot, configuring decnet, starring decnet, and then editing SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM to autostart DECnet.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 01/12/2013 07:57 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I never found use for a graphics head on that class of boxes.
I don't have anything that can handle MMJ and no local place would sell a null modem cable.
I'll make you an MMJ cable when we get together.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
