El 31/12/2012, a les 14:29, sampsa at mac.com va escriure:
I think it _COULD_, it's just PPP with some encryption and stuff thrown in.
But all the implementations I know just route IP...
I'm not sure you will be able to do it. It will not route DECNET packets at all. If I am not wrong you will need to run Johnny's bridge or a Multinet tunnel to make the DECNET packets flow... Or, as alternative, to make a distributed VDE pipe running over an ssh tunnel running over your PPTP connection :)
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
On 31 Dec 2012, at 15:29, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
On 31 Dec 2012, at 13:26, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
I noticed that Linux SIMH is about twice as fast on OS X.
KUHAVX got about 12 VUPS when running natively on a Core i5 iMac, 24 when in a Linux VM on the same hardware. Pretty weird.
Does that mean there is a VUPS benchmark loose on HECnet? Where can I copy it from? I want to test a RaspberryPi! :)
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/medialib/vups.com or RHESUS::[.MEDIALIB]VUPS.COM
On 2012-12-31 14:26, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
I noticed that Linux SIMH is about twice as fast on OS X.
KUHAVX got about 12 VUPS when running natively on a Core i5 iMac, 24 when in a Linux VM on the same hardware. Pretty weird.
Weird indeed. Maybe 64 bit vs. 32 bit binary? Or some weird optimizations when building simh for Linux?
After all, the Linux virtual machine runs rather native, so the slow down in that step is pretty minimal.
Johnny
On 31 Dec 2012, at 13:26, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
I noticed that Linux SIMH is about twice as fast on OS X.
KUHAVX got about 12 VUPS when running natively on a Core i5 iMac, 24 when in a Linux VM on the same hardware. Pretty weird.
Does that mean there is a VUPS benchmark loose on HECnet? Where can I copy it from? I want to test a RaspberryPi! :)
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
I think it _COULD_, it's just PPP with some encryption and stuff thrown in.
But all the implementations I know just route IP...
sampsa
On 31 Dec 2012, at 15:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
El 31/12/2012, a les 14:24, sampsa at mac.com va escriure:
I've got a PPTP VPN to my London flat (the equipment will soon be relocated to a 1/3rd colo'd rack, when I sell the place) and run the bridge over it. Works pretty well.
Does that route at level 2? I mean... can you do DECNET over a PPTP VPN?
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
El 31/12/2012, a les 14:24, sampsa at mac.com va escriure:
I've got a PPTP VPN to my London flat (the equipment will soon be relocated to a 1/3rd colo'd rack, when I sell the place) and run the bridge over it. Works pretty well.
Does that route at level 2? I mean... can you do DECNET over a PPTP VPN?
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
I noticed that Linux SIMH is about twice as fast on OS X.
KUHAVX got about 12 VUPS when running natively on a Core i5 iMac, 24 when in a Linux VM on the same hardware. Pretty weird.
sampsa
On 2012-12-29 22:46, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 29 Dec 2012, at 16:45, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-29 21:20, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 29 Dec 2012, at 15:17, Joe Ferraro <jferraro at gmail.com
<mailto:jferraro at gmail.com>> wrote:
Johnny... you are still too low in the stack... JAVA may as well be
the new assembly (though I think its more like the COBOL of future IT,
in that we'll spend the next 50 years trying to get rid of it). I
don't think I've seen a developer "code" anything lower than Ruby or
Python in years...
I don't think Sunacle will let Java die. ;)
In all fairness, he did say "we'll spend the next 50 years trying to get rid of it".
I know someone that was trying to make an IRC bot in x86 ASM...
I'll probably do one in PDP-11 assembler, just to spite you. :-)
That would be impressive!
Can't see why. I have an irc client which I think is less than 100 lines of C. Since I already have TCP/IP on my RSX system, doing an IRC client inspired by that C thing would be a piece of cake. I'll sit down and fix that tomorrow.
Doing a bot as a next stop, once that is done, would be easy. You didn't ask that it would be any good, or do anything meaningful. :-)
Johnny
Johnny
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
On 2012-12-29 20:55, Peter Lothberg wrote:
But it is fun to see people fail. :-)
It is definitely fun to watch people try to break in to
VMS. ;)
On Sol.Stupi.Se <http://sol.stupi.se/> (59.10) they think it
understands X.86 binaries..
I'm sure tehey don't even understand the stackpointer moves UP not
down on a DEC20/PDP10.
You are giving them way too much credit, Peter. I'm sure most of
them would not even know what a stack pointer is... The stack is a
magic object that keeps information around in your Java virtual
machine...
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
These are for my network in Beirut, moving there on 30 Jan.
I've got a PPTP VPN to my London flat (the equipment will soon be relocated to a 1/3rd colo'd rack, when I sell the place) and run the bridge over it. Works pretty well.
sampsa
On 31 Dec 2012, at 15:17, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-31 11:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Can you register these for me when you get a moment:
BEIRUT 8.220
LBNVAX 8.221
KIBBEH 8.222
Done. We're up to 442 registered node names in HECnet now.
Johnny
On 2012-12-31 11:28, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Can you register these for me when you get a moment:
BEIRUT 8.220
LBNVAX 8.221
KIBBEH 8.222
Done. We're up to 442 registered node names in HECnet now.
Johnny
