On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:05, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 23:03, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
We could do OpenVPN Layer 2 bridging. Can it be made to handle the multicast bits? My ISP here (512k up!) blocks L2TP proper unfortunately.
My mail server on the other hand has plenty of bandwidth and blocks no protocols, but it's running low on RAM.
My primary VPS would need another IP and a little bit of MAC hackery, but I might be able to get my provider to allow that. It runs FreeBSD and I don't think any alpha simulators run on it natively alphavm-free may run in linux binary compat, though...
Let me know when you got the VPN up - I'll roll a SIMH-VAX and cluster it with you :)
I have a VPN up here at my house, Not sure if it'll do Layer 2 stuff properly though, I'm kind of inexperienced with that. ;)
Sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:05, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/25/2012 04:03 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
We could do OpenVPN Layer 2 bridging. Can it be made to handle the
multicast bits? My ISP here (512k up!) blocks L2TP proper
unfortunately.
Wow. Time to move!
My primary VPS would need another IP and a little bit of MAC hackery,
but I might be able to get my provider to allow that. It runs
FreeBSD and I don't think any alpha simulators run on it
natively alphavm-free may run in linux binary compat, though...
Real (and FAST!) Alphas are not at all tough to find; I don't see the
point of Alpha emulators.
How cheaply could I get one though?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 25 Dec 2012, at 23:12, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Apologies if this sent twice my mail server/email client is being a brat again
Mail.app and Zimbra are quite sensitive. ;)
I think it was - I use Mail.app + dovecot + postfix on my new mail server, seems to work fine.
Of course this email address goes through Apple's servers, no major problems so far...
Sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:12, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:02, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I have access to systems with lots of bandwidth, they just implement a bit of MAC filtering and have limited IPs.
I'm actually selling the London apartment and moving my boxes to a co-location facility - that should dramatically increase bandwidth.
I could also use another friend's server he has PLENTY of bandwidth, ram, disk, but not CPU. ;)
At the moment they're on a DSL :(
DSL that manages to be better than mine. ;)
Sampsa
Apologies if this sent twice my mail server/email client is being a brat again
Mail.app and Zimbra are quite sensitive. ;)
I think I just accidentally sent the same messages about 3 times each. Oops. Hooray glitches.
Sorry guys.
On 25 Dec 2012, at 23:06, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
At the moment they're on a DSL :(
DSL that manages to be better than mine. ;)
My Finland-based 3G is faster than the UK DSL, except for pings of course.
In fact the whole HILANT:: cluster is connected over 3G (USB dongle plugged into a router).
sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:02, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I have access to systems with lots of bandwidth, they just implement a bit of MAC filtering and have limited IPs.
I'm actually selling the London apartment and moving my boxes to a co-location facility - that should dramatically increase bandwidth.
I could also use another friend's server he has PLENTY of bandwidth, ram, disk, but not CPU. ;)
At the moment they're on a DSL :(
DSL that manages to be better than mine. ;)
Sampsa
Apologies if this sent twice my mail server/email client is being a brat again
Mail.app and Zimbra are quite sensitive. ;)
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:02, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I have access to systems with lots of bandwidth, they just implement a bit of MAC filtering and have limited IPs.
I'm actually selling the London apartment and moving my boxes to a co-location facility - that should dramatically increase bandwidth.
I could also use another friend's server he has PLENTY of bandwidth, ram, disk, but not CPU. ;)
At the moment they're on a DSL :(
DSL that manages to be better than mine. ;)
Sampsa
Apologies if this sent twice my mail server/email client is being a brat again
Mail.app and Zimbra are quite sensitive. ;)
Guys,
I made another version of the grapher to JUST look at the router connections:
http://www.sampsa.com/just-routers.svg
Does this look about right?
sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 16:02, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 25 Dec 2012, at 22:59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I have access to systems with lots of bandwidth, they just implement a bit of MAC filtering and have limited IPs.
I'm actually selling the London apartment and moving my boxes to a co-location facility - that should dramatically increase bandwidth.
I could also use another friend's server he has PLENTY of bandwidth, ram, disk, but not CPU. ;)
At the moment they're on a DSL :(
DSL that manages to be better than mine. ;)
Sampsa
On 25 Dec 2012, at 23:05, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
My primary VPS would need another IP and a little bit of MAC hackery, but I might be able to get my provider to allow that. It runs FreeBSD and I don't think any alpha simulators run on it natively alphavm-free may run in linux binary compat, though...
We don't need Alphas, if we're running LAN over IP, just use SIMH. That'll build easily on NetBSD :)
