8 Feb
2016
8 Feb
'16
5:36 a.m.
I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
Oops. That went to the list. :)
Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants the 1811w. :)
-brian
On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson <steve at
davidson.net> wrote:
If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home. :-)
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>
> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>
> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>
> -brian
>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough. You could
>>> build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which would work a
bit
>>> better. What is the OS?
>>
>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with VAXELN. ;)
>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> --
>> Cory Smelosky
>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
8 Feb
8 Feb
6:01 a.m.
I'm trying to figure out which would have the smallest power consumption and physical
footprint...
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at
infocomm.com> wrote:
I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
Oops. That went to the list. :)
Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants the 1811w. :)
-brian
On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson
<steve at davidson.net> wrote:
If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home. :-)
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>
> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>
> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>
> -brian
>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough. You could
>>> build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which would work a
bit
>>> better. What is the OS?
>>
>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with VAXELN. ;)
>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> --
>> Cory Smelosky
>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
6:03 a.m.
Hello!
And which one of those critters also supports COAX (Ethernet over COAX
with those BNC style connectors) as an input medium.
I still haven't completely worked out how to make my great idea
regarding those Terminal Servers I have here.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which would have the
smallest power consumption and
physical footprint...
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
Oops. That went to the list. :)
Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants the
1811w. :)
-brian
On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson
<steve at davidson.net> wrote:
If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home. :-)
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>
> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>
> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>
> -brian
>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough. You
>>> could
>>> build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which would work a
>>> bit
>>> better. What is the OS?
>>
>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with VAXELN.
>> ;)
>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> --
>> Cory Smelosky
>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
9:52 p.m.
Well, you could do worse than a Raspberry Pi running the user mode router. That would have
low power and low footprint?.
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-hecnet at update.uu.se] On Behalf Of Cory
Smelosky
Sent: 08 February 2016 05:02
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
I'm trying to figure out which would have the smallest power consumption and physical
footprint...
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net <mailto:wonko at 4amlunch.net>
wrote:
Oops. That went to the list. :)
Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants the 1811w. :)
-brian
On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson <steve at
davidson.net <mailto:steve at davidson.net> > wrote:
If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home. :-)
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net <mailto:wonko at 4amlunch.net>
wrote:
>
> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>
> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>
> -brian
>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net <mailto:b4 at
gewt.net> > wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough. You could
>>> build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which would work a
bit
>>> better. What is the OS?
>>
>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with VAXELN. ;)
>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> --
>> Cory Smelosky
>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
9:55 p.m.
Hello!
Robert are you offering that as a formal suggestion?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Robert Jarratt
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
Well, you could do worse than a Raspberry Pi running
the user mode router.
That would have low power and low footprint?.
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-hecnet at update.uu.se] On Behalf
Of Cory Smelosky
Sent: 08 February 2016 05:02
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
I'm trying to figure out which would have the smallest power consumption and
physical footprint...
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
Oops. That went to the list. :)
Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants the
1811w. :)
-brian
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net> wrote:
>
> If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home. :-)
>
> -Steve
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>>
>> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>>
>> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>>
>> -brian
>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough. You
>>>> could
>>>> build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which would work
a
>>>> bit
>>>> better. What is the OS?
>>>
>>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with VAXELN.
>>> ;)
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cory Smelosky
>>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
10:57 p.m.
I don't know about "formal", but a Pi could easily be a small DECnet router
running something like my little user mode router. It could deal with routing between a
remote bridge and a LAN with a single NIC.
However, I have always known my implementation is a bit na?ve, and now I *think* I am
seeing it dropping incoming packets due to some slowness which is exposing that naivety.
So don't expect great performance yet... I am contemplating some re-work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-hecnet at update.uu.se]
On Behalf Of Gregg Levine
Sent: 08 February 2016 20:56
To: Hecnet <hecnet at update.uu.se>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
Hello!
Robert are you offering that as a formal suggestion?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Robert Jarratt
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
Well, you could do worse than a Raspberry Pi
running the user mode
router.
That would have low power and low footprint?.
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-
hecnet at update.uu.se] On
> Behalf Of Cory Smelosky
> Sent: 08 February 2016 05:02
> To: hecnet at update.uu.se
> Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
>
>
>
> I'm trying to figure out which would have the smallest power
> consumption and physical footprint...
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
>
> I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
>
> On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>
> Oops. That went to the list. :)
>
> Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants
> the 1811w. :)
>
> -brian
>
>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net> wrote:
>>
>> If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home.
>> :-)
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>>>
>>> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want
it?
>>>
>>> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>>>
>>> -brian
>>>
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough.
You
>>>>> could build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS,
which
>>>>> would work a bit better. What is the OS?
>>>>
>>>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with
VAXELN.
>>>> ;)
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cory Smelosky
>>>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>>>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
9 Feb
9 Feb
12:03 a.m.
I just have little VAXELN experience. ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2016, at 13:57, Robert Jarratt
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
I don't know about "formal", but a Pi could easily be a small DECnet router
running something like my little user mode router. It could deal with routing between a
remote bridge and a LAN with a single NIC.
However, I have always known my implementation is a bit na?ve, and now I *think* I am
seeing it dropping incoming packets due to some slowness which is exposing that naivety.
So don't expect great performance yet... I am contemplating some re-work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-hecnet at update.uu.se]
On Behalf Of Gregg Levine
Sent: 08 February 2016 20:56
To: Hecnet <hecnet at update.uu.se>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
Hello!
Robert are you offering that as a formal suggestion?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Robert Jarratt
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
Well, you could do worse than a Raspberry Pi
running the user mode
router.
That would have low power and low footprint?.
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at update.uu.se [mailto:owner-
hecnet at update.uu.se] On
> Behalf Of Cory Smelosky
> Sent: 08 February 2016 05:02
> To: hecnet at update.uu.se
> Subject: Re: [HECnet] VAXELN Router on HECnet
>
>
>
> I'm trying to figure out which would have the smallest power
> consumption and physical footprint...
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:36, Mark Pizzolato <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
>
> I've got a 2620 and an 861 which anyone can have for the cost of shipping.
>
> On Feb 7, 2016 8:30 PM, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>
> Oops. That went to the list. :)
>
> Well, between the two of you decide who wants the 1841 and who wants
> the 1811w. :)
>
> -brian
>
>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:09, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net> wrote:
>>
>> If you have a second one kicking around I can give it a GREAT home.
>> :-)
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 20:44, wonko at 4amlunch.net wrote:
>>>
>>> Want a Cisco router? I don't think I'll ever use this 1841. Want it?
>>>
>>> Yours for the cost of shipping.
>>>
>>> -brian
>>>
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2016, at 18:31, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Robert Jarratt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can, but I think you will find it just isn't quick enough.
You
>>>>> could build my ordinary code directly for the router's OS, which
>>>>> would work a bit better. What is the OS?
>>>>
>>>> It's just debian - this is merely a subtle excuse to play with
VAXELN.
>>>> ;)
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cory Smelosky
>>>> http://gewt.net Personal stuff
>>>> http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
3018
days inactive
3018
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
b4＠gewt.net -
gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com -
Mark＠infocomm.com -
robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com