Glad to hear that solved it.
I asked already from the start if it was BASIC+ or BASIC+2, because the
difference is important.
And it really is BASIC+2, and not BASIC2+. :-)
As for why your installation happened that way, I have no clue. Did you
install from the distribution tapes yourself, or is this some image
someone else created and you got a copy from?
And did you use the proper installation tools, or did you extract files
yourself from the tape and placed in various directories?
Johnny
On 2018-09-17 20:05, Keith Halewood wrote:
Thanks Johnny,
It?s [1,2]bp2rfa.hlp and its protection was 48. I?ve set it to 40 and a
non-privileged, non [1,*] account can now see help in the basic-2-plus env.
The whole RSTS/E V10.1 and BASIC-2-PLUS installations are entirely
default. Apart from adding DECNET/E and enabling LAT etc., nothing else
should be other than default.
Weird.
Thanks again
Keith
*From:*owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] *On
Behalf Of *Johnny Billquist
*Sent:* 17 September 2018 18:36
*To:* hecnet at Update.UU.SE; Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net>
*Subject:* Re: [HECnet] RSTS/E 10.1 BASIC-2-PLUS problem
All that said - if the op is actually using basic+2 then help is a
builtin command in the interactive environment. Furthermore the basic+2
builtin help uses an extra file for fast lookups into the help file, so
this additional file could also be the problem.
I'd need to check when I'm back home what the exact name of this file
is, but something like bp2hlp.rfa maybe?
Johnny
Paul Koning <paulkoning at
comcast.net <mailto:paulkoning at comcast.net>>
skrev: (17 september 2018 16:38:37 CEST)
Command processing in RSTS depends on which runtime system (more precisely,
"keyboard monitor") you're currently in.
If you're in DCL, standard DCL commands (like "copy") are understood.?
"help" is another standard DCL command.
In most other runtime systems, like BASIC, there are a few built-in commands that
relate more to the purpose of that runtime system (like "SAVE" or
"OLD").
In addition, keyboard monitors normally understand any of the defined "system
commands" -- also called "CCL commands".?? Those are commands defined via
the create command/system DCL operation, and you can see them with show command/system.?
For example:
$ show com/sys
BCK-?????? =? SY:[? 0,10 ]RMSBCK.TSK /LINE=0
BYE-?????? =? SY:[? 1,2? ]LOGOUT.TSK /LINE=0??? /PRIVILEGE
CNV-?????? =? SY:[? 0,10 ]RMSCNV.TSK /LINE=0
DI-RECTORY =? SY:[? 1,2? ]DIRECT.TSK /LINE=CCL? /PRIVILEGE
...
In my system, "help" is not shown there, so while DCL knows it, other RTS
would not.? If your system does respond to it, what is the command definition?
As for [0,2]help.tsk, that's a strange protection code.? Mine has <104> and
I can see no reason why that program should be privileged.
????? paul
On Sep 17, 2018, at 10:30 AM, Keith Halewood <Keith.Halewood at
pitbulluk.org
<mailto:Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org>> wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the info. Other than help.hlp, there is only help.tsk in [0,2] and it
has protection <232> (privileged, execute, world readonly, group+owner read/write)
After a backup, I?ll do some further experimentation.
Regards
Keith
From:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE <mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Paul Koning
Sent: 17 September 2018 14:01
To:hecnet at Update.UU.SE <mailto:hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] RSTS/E 10.1 BASIC-2-PLUS problem
On Sep 14, 2018, at 5:26 PM, Keith Halewood <Keith.Halewood at
pitbulluk.org
<mailto:Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I?ve been playing with RSTS/E for a short while, particularly BASIC PLUS. I?ve
noted that, logged into account [1,2] I can issue HELP from within BASIC and it?s all
fine. From a non-privileged account I created, HELP within BASIC gives me a ??Protection
violation? but it seems that all the .HLP files relevant to BASIC have the correct
<40> file protection. Am I missing something? Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Keith
"help" is most likely a CCL command -- a command defined, typically at
startup, that is handled by executing a program.
You're right that the actual content in in the *.hlp files, and they need to
be protected <40> for that to work.? But in addition, the program that handles the
command has to be executable by non-privileged users.? So look in [0,*] or [1,2] for a
help.* file (help.tsk, help.bac, help.sav perhaps).? It has to be executable (64 bit set
in the protection code).? So a typical protection code would be 104.
????????????paul
--
Skickat fr?n min Android-enhet med K-9 Mail. Urs?kta min f?ordighet.
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol