OK, now I've got it.? I believe this reverse-engineering may have also
happened for TSU's on the 36 bit line.? It is now specifically outlawed
by the Digital Millennium Act, but that hackery undoubtedly predated
it.? One assumes that it was contractually precluded.
But I still find this particular financial speculation compelling; cash
flow in new (younger than a decade) small companies can be a significant
driver for certain kinds of decisions unless they are prodigiously
funded (perhaps by VC). OpenVMS x86_64 may or may not generate a certain
amount of revenue; there is clearly risk there.? However, right now,
it's not generating _anything_, is costing resources and hhas yet to be
delivered.
Hence it follows that a bean counter might be looking around for, you
know, beans...? That could also drive actions on discovery of non-VSI
issued PAK's.? I do not have an informed opinion on PAK tracking nor VSI
funding, VC or otherwise.
On 3/7/20 2:07 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 3/7/20 2:04 PM, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
I guess I must be confused and have been
unclear.? If the PAK isn't VSI
generated, isn't that the same thing?
Semantics..
I had been thinking reverse
engineering the PAK, but didn't state that as Ihad been musing that
stubs could be easier.
But reverse-engineering the PAKs has already been done,
decades ago.
-Dave