I have pydecnet running on raspberry pi 3b+
under raspbian with the bridge and tap support added. It does the job.
Keith
On 25 Feb 2020, at 15:55, Paul Koning <paulkoning
at comcast.net> wrote:
?
On Feb
25, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Robert Armstrong <bob at jfcl.com> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of
Paul Koning
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 6:53 AM
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Multinet alternatives ...
Paul Koning [paulkoning at
comcast.net] wrote:
There was, but I think Python recently dropped VMS support due to lack of a maintainer.
Dropped VMS or dropped VAX? There was a Python for AXP (although I don't know if
it's still supported) but I don't think there was for VAX.
How do people who use your router typically run it? Do they run it on Linux?
Linux or Mac, including at least one example on Linux on a z/390, and another on
Beaglebone Black. But the point of the exercise was to create code that would run,
unchanged, on anything that supports Python. For example, while I avoid Windows if at all
possible, it certainly should run there without trouble. Or NetBSD, to pick just one
other random example.
TOPS-10
is Phase IV, right? Any of the common DECnet implementations should talk to that.
TOPS-10 v7.04 (or maybe 7.05) is Phase IV. That's good news - I've wanted to set
up a TOPS-10 simulation, but running a simh780 just to route DECnet for the DMR on TOPS-10
was not attractive.
I'd rather have TOPS-20 but as you say TOPS-20 on simh with networking is not very
practical.
It does work well enough that I was able use it to verify Phase II support. I plan to
add intercept support for talking to non-adjacent nodes, but that isn't in yet. A
primitive version is easy, a proper version is quite a lot harder.
paul