10 Nov
2021
10 Nov
'21
3:16 p.m.
On 11/10/21 9:01 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
Curious. ?And you're running those with the actual
time, not a date in
the past?
FAL says "27-Oct-34", show date looks correct (assuming not 1921).
Event type 33.0, Remote file access
Occurred 27-Oct-34 14:11:53.7 on node 31.28 (RST101)
Access: Local
Function: OPEN/Read
Remote node = 0 (RST101)
Remote process = 0 1 2 NFT002
Local process = 17 50 1 FAL006
User = 50,1
File accessed = 1 SY:[50,1]INFO.TXT
$
$
$
$ show date
? 10-Nov-21 02:12 PM
I wonder if the copy of DECnet I have is from before
some patches that
fix some of these issues.
paul
--
On Nov 10, 2021, at 6:47 AM, Supratim Sanyal
<supratim at riseup.net> wrote:
On 11/10/21 5:14 AM, Keith Halewood wrote:
I?m running RSTS/E 10.1-L out of the box so to
speak. I?m not seeing
any error messages.
No such errors on 31.28 (RST101) either.
/s.
Keith
*From:*owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]*On
Behalf Of*Tony Nicholson
*Sent:*10 November 2021 08:46
*To:*hecnet at update.uu.se
*Subject:*Re: [HECnet] RSTS/E started emitting "?EVTLOG (BLDNIC) --
%Integer error" messages
Paul Koning is working on a fix.
The RSTS/E DECnet event logger has an integer overflow too.? He said
in a e-mail to me -
??I think I found the problem, yes it's a signed overflow.? The
"julian halfdays" used in the event log timestamp overflows on
10-Nov-2021.? I fixed an unsigned issue in the INPUT to the function
that converts RSTS date to julian halfday, but I didn't notice the
unsigned issue in the formula for the output.?
Tony
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 19:14, Wilm Boerhout <wboerhout at gmail.com> wrote:
I am receiving the same messages on the console since today. I
am running the ?latest? DECnet images that I picked up in July 2020.
--
Tony Nicholson <tony.nicholson at computer.org>
--
<SANYALNET-LABS-QR-CODE.png>