6 Nov
2021
6 Nov
'21
1:09 a.m.
Boy, now that is a pal!
So where would somebody like me be able to get that?? The 4.1 Galaxy has
some very interesting things in MOUNTR that were sadly removed that I
would like to put in at some point in order to be able to set
super-domestic on a per-structure basis.
super-domestic can make your life easier because you have less directory
and user numbers overall to deal with.? However, the other side of that
coin is that you have less of them total.? If you have a large number of
directories, users and structures, you run out of number, maybe, maybe
(it's an 18 bit field)? There's also the case of a restored structure
with it's own numbers that might clash with super-domestic.? That might
happen if you grab a lot of DECUS stuff (although there is brokeness
there, too)
Still for, with automated number management, much of the headache (and
hence reason) for super-domestic goes away and I'd rather have the extra
granularity.
It really depends on how you're going to use the system and how 'Unixy'
you want certain things to work.? So I'd rather shut it off for my
purposes, but I sure wouldn't want it not to be available.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/4/21 7:30 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
A kind soul sent me a TOPS-20 V4.1 SIMH disk a while
ago with basic
information, and that's what I use for my Phase II testing. ?It has in
its <DECNET> directory some sources: NETCON bits, NFT, DAP.
I also realized there's a DECnet-20 V2 (Phase II) user manual on
Bitsavers, which combines programming and management documentation.
?It mentions that Phase II NCP has a NICE protocol just like the later
versions, except that it doesn't seems to be compatible. ?At least my
NICE listener doesn't like what it hears. ?Something else to play with
at some point.
paul
On Nov 4, 2021, at 5:23 PM, Thomas DeBellis
<tommytimesharing at gmail.com> wrote:
Where did you get that NETCON from?? I don't have it.
Or is a Tops-10 NETCON?? (which I wouldn't have, either)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 11/4/21 3:22 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> I found the code, it's in NETCON (specifically, NCP). So now all I have to do is
reverse engineer it. That's going to be interesting because I haven't looked at
Macro-10 in 45 years, and even back then I didn't really know it well at all.
>
> paul
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> On Oct 28, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Paul Koning<paulkoning at comcast.net>
wrote:
>>
>> I'm guessing it has to do with learning the shape of the Phase II network.
That's an entirely different problem than Phase III and later. The connect is by
name, so object 0, object name TOPOL. And I don't have anything to answer that
request so I have no trace. I suppose I could build a dummy responder just to see what
question is asked.
>>
>> If indeed it's Phase II topology related, it would make sense for the host
not to have that server, and of course it would also go away in Phase III. The host
requests, but does not offer, "intercept" which is node name based routing in
Phase II that was implemented only in a few places. Somewhere I saw that it exists only
to get past the front end (on larger machines) which was handled as a separate node so it
counts as a network hop. Without intercept, Phase II only goes a single hop.
>>
>> I found the code, it's in NETCON (specifically, NCP). So now all I have to
do is reverse engineer it. That's going to be interesting because I haven't
looked at Macro-10 in 45 years, and even back then I didn't really know it well at
all.
>>
>> paul
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> On Oct 27, 2021, at 9:32 PM, Thomas DeBellis<tommytimesharing at
gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> TOPOL? Hmm... No, I hadn't heard of that, either. It sounds almost
familiar, but I don't know why Tops-20 would be asking for it because it doesn't
appear to be serving it, viz:...