I think I could create duplicate services of Telnet, each on the other port, and the set enabled-nodes.
Could take a while though :)
Sampsa
On 28 Dec 2012, at 00:07, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
sampsa at mac.com writes:
That writes it to the COMMON directory by default.
Wonder if there's an option to make it node specific.
Sampsa
If you need specific MultiNet question answered, join the info-mulitnet
mailing list. If you can't get the answers you're looking for via that
channel, let me know and I will call in a favor from some of my friends
at Process.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
sampsa at mac.com writes:
That writes it to the COMMON directory by default.
Wonder if there's an option to make it node specific.
Sampsa
If you need specific MultiNet question answered, join the info-mulitnet
mailing list. If you can't get the answers you're looking for via that
channel, let me know and I will call in a favor from some of my friends
at Process.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 27 Dec 2012, at 17:03, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
That writes it to the COMMON directory by default.
Wonder if there's an option to make it node specific.
Does it ask for a specific place to store the configuration files?
Sampsa
On 28 Dec 2012, at 00:02, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
sampsa at mac.com writes:
I have a cluster with 3 nodes that have multinet on them.
Due to the stupidity of my router's forwarding rules, I need telnet to
run on a different port on each of them, so eg:
NODE1 port 2301 NODE2 port 2302 NODE3 port 2303
Is this possible?
How do I configure this?
sampsa
$ MULTINET CONFIGURE/SERVER
*IF* it's possible.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
That writes it to the COMMON directory by default.
Wonder if there's an option to make it node specific.
Sampsa
On 28 Dec 2012, at 00:02, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
sampsa at mac.com writes:
I have a cluster with 3 nodes that have multinet on them.
Due to the stupidity of my router's forwarding rules, I need telnet to
run on a different port on each of them, so eg:
NODE1 port 2301 NODE2 port 2302 NODE3 port 2303
Is this possible?
How do I configure this?
sampsa
$ MULTINET CONFIGURE/SERVER
*IF* it's possible.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
sampsa at mac.com writes:
I have a cluster with 3 nodes that have multinet on them.
Due to the stupidity of my router's forwarding rules, I need telnet to
run on a different port on each of them, so eg:
NODE1 port 2301 NODE2 port 2302 NODE3 port 2303
Is this possible?
How do I configure this?
sampsa
$ MULTINET CONFIGURE/SERVER
*IF* it's possible.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
I have a cluster with 3 nodes that have multinet on them.
Due to the stupidity of my router's forwarding rules, I need telnet to run on a different port on each of them, so eg:
NODE1 port 2301
NODE2 port 2302
NODE3 port 2303
Is this possible?
How do I configure this?
sampsa
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:21, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:14, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:08, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2012 04:07 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
I thought it started as a learning experience and response from
working with that kludge called Minnix with regards to Torvalds.
Especially since the first file system that the early kernels worked
with/ran on was indeed Minnix.
It did indeed; Linux existed with *only* MINIX filesystem support for
quite some time.
Now it supports everything from FAT12 to ZFS. ;) (and to some extent FILES-11)
Btw, don't try to install it to FAT32. It's to exactly fond of that.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
My first Slackware jobs were on a FAT32 system with Zipslack unzipped
there. It worked rather well for a time after I managed to get sound
working. Eventually I managed to get the same one running native. And
on a different system (really the first P100 system I started with.
The other was a P3.)
Let me rephrase: don't try to install modern Arch Linux to FAT32. ;)
Now I have Slackware 13.37 running on something later and grouchier.
This does not explain why Dave your building is being used for a
snowball as handball game exercise.
Sure it does! Something something linux wars and practicing.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
Indeed. 2.6 and later do not support the UMSDOS forms. However that
was aimed at Dave, not you Cory.
Ah, okay.
However why is there an escaped bigfoot making its way towards you
right now Cory?
It wants to sell me a timeshare.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:14, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:08, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2012 04:07 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
I thought it started as a learning experience and response from
working with that kludge called Minnix with regards to Torvalds.
Especially since the first file system that the early kernels worked
with/ran on was indeed Minnix.
It did indeed; Linux existed with *only* MINIX filesystem support for
quite some time.
Now it supports everything from FAT12 to ZFS. ;) (and to some extent FILES-11)
Btw, don't try to install it to FAT32. It's to exactly fond of that.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
My first Slackware jobs were on a FAT32 system with Zipslack unzipped
there. It worked rather well for a time after I managed to get sound
working. Eventually I managed to get the same one running native. And
on a different system (really the first P100 system I started with.
The other was a P3.)
Let me rephrase: don't try to install modern Arch Linux to FAT32. ;)
Now I have Slackware 13.37 running on something later and grouchier.
This does not explain why Dave your building is being used for a
snowball as handball game exercise.
Sure it does! Something something linux wars and practicing.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
Indeed. 2.6 and later do not support the UMSDOS forms. However that
was aimed at Dave, not you Cory.
However why is there an escaped bigfoot making its way towards you
right now Cory?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:14, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:08, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2012 04:07 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
I thought it started as a learning experience and response from
working with that kludge called Minnix with regards to Torvalds.
Especially since the first file system that the early kernels worked
with/ran on was indeed Minnix.
It did indeed; Linux existed with *only* MINIX filesystem support for
quite some time.
Now it supports everything from FAT12 to ZFS. ;) (and to some extent FILES-11)
Btw, don't try to install it to FAT32. It's to exactly fond of that.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
My first Slackware jobs were on a FAT32 system with Zipslack unzipped
there. It worked rather well for a time after I managed to get sound
working. Eventually I managed to get the same one running native. And
on a different system (really the first P100 system I started with.
The other was a P3.)
Let me rephrase: don't try to install modern Arch Linux to FAT32. ;)
Now I have Slackware 13.37 running on something later and grouchier.
This does not explain why Dave your building is being used for a
snowball as handball game exercise.
Sure it does! Something something linux wars and practicing.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Dec 2012, at 16:08, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2012 04:07 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
I thought it started as a learning experience and response from
working with that kludge called Minnix with regards to Torvalds.
Especially since the first file system that the early kernels worked
with/ran on was indeed Minnix.
It did indeed; Linux existed with *only* MINIX filesystem support for
quite some time.
Now it supports everything from FAT12 to ZFS. ;) (and to some extent FILES-11)
Btw, don't try to install it to FAT32. It's to exactly fond of that.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Hello!
My first Slackware jobs were on a FAT32 system with Zipslack unzipped
there. It worked rather well for a time after I managed to get sound
working. Eventually I managed to get the same one running native. And
on a different system (really the first P100 system I started with.
The other was a P3.)
Now I have Slackware 13.37 running on something later and grouchier.
This does not explain why Dave your building is being used for a
snowball as handball game exercise.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
