HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

5 participants
15588 discussions

by hvlems＠zonnet.nl

Jordi, are you a pilot? Hans ------Origineel bericht------ Van: Jordi Guillaumes i Pons Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp: [HECnet] For the Rasp-pi tinkerers... Verzonden: 4 januari 2013 01:10 Rasp-pi + simh + RSX + a little bit of electronics = nice light show ;) http://ancientbits.blogspot.com.es/2013/01/let-there-be-blinkenlight.html Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years

Raspberry PI and PDP-11 emulation via SIMH

by jeep＠scshome.net

I did not have this issue. All I did was "apt-get install simh" and life was good! I am running the 3900 simulation (for now). I will switch over to the 11/780 later this week. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of sampsa at mac.com Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 07:50 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Raspberry PI and PDP-11 emulation via SIMH On 3 Jan 2013, at 04:34, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: Either it is dated, or the raspbian repository lacks it entirely. I forget which. Dated and no ethernet. Basically do this (as root): apt-get install build-essential apt-get build-dep simh <download SIMH sources and make>

13 years

For the Rasp-pi tinkerers...

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 01/03/2013 07:10 PM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote: Rasp-pi + simh + RSX + a little bit of electronics = nice light show ;) http://ancientbits.blogspot.com.es/2013/01/let-there-be-blinkenlight.html Nice! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

13 years

For the Rasp-pi tinkerers...

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

Rasp-pi + simh + RSX + a little bit of electronics = nice light show ;) http://ancientbits.blogspot.com.es/2013/01/let-there-be-blinkenlight.html Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years

DU11 vs. DUV11

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-01-03 18:37, John Wilson wrote: Trivia question: what are the major differences between programming the DU11 and the DUV11? At least from the handbook descriptions, it sounds like the DUV11's isochronous (= async?) mode works and the DU11's doesn't, but that's the only difference I can see and I don't see how it matters for DDCMP use. And yet, DECnet/RSX has different names for them, as if it's using separate drivers for each. If DECnet/RSX uses different names, then it is also definitely using different drivers. However, who knows if the actual contents of the drivers differ, or if they just liked having different names for them. :-) (I can check next week. Please remind me...) Johnny

13 years

DU11 vs. DUV11

by wilson＠dbit.com

Trivia question: what are the major differences between programming the DU11 and the DUV11? At least from the handbook descriptions, it sounds like the DUV11's isochronous (= async?) mode works and the DU11's doesn't, but that's the only difference I can see and I don't see how it matters for DDCMP use. And yet, DECnet/RSX has different names for them, as if it's using separate drivers for each. John Wilson D Bit

13 years

DMC11 in next simh version... looks nice, and question about TOPS-10

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

El 03/01/2013, a les 16:28, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> va escriure: Those symbols have to be getting defined somewhere. I am unfamiliar with the TOPS-10 monitor build procedure; did you do the equivalent of a "make clean" first? Well, I deleted the MONGEN.MIC file, ran a whole MONGEN and then did the compile and link as per installation manual. The only stupid thing I noticed is I was compiling (not linking in) the DTEPRM.MAC source, which is KL specific. Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years

DMC11 in next simh version... looks nice, and question about TOPS-10

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 01/03/2013 10:22 AM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote: Let's hope that the ANF-10 trick is enough! :) I just made another compile WITHOUT ANF-10 and now I have got no missing symbols. This begins to look somehow as black magic. Those symbols have to be getting defined somewhere. I am unfamiliar with the TOPS-10 monitor build procedure; did you do the equivalent of a "make clean" first? I will give up by now. :-( -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

13 years

DMC11 in next simh version... looks nice, and question about TOPS-10

by b4＠gewt.net

On 3 Jan 2013, at 10:22, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote: El 03/01/2013, a les 12:46, G. <gerry77 at mail.com> va escriure: Let's hope that the ANF-10 trick is enough! :) I just made another compile WITHOUT ANF-10 and now I have got no missing symbols. This begins to look somehow as black magic. Oh, and the startup crash shows up if I include any networking capability in the monitor, with or without KMC and DMR... I will give up by now. It's unfortunate both of us had to give up. :( Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years

DMC11 in next simh version... looks nice, and question about TOPS-10

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

El 03/01/2013, a les 12:46, G. <gerry77 at mail.com> va escriure: Let's hope that the ANF-10 trick is enough! :) I just made another compile WITHOUT ANF-10 and now I have got no missing symbols. This begins to look somehow as black magic. Oh, and the startup crash shows up if I include any networking capability in the monitor, with or without KMC and DMR... I will give up by now. Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet