HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

15559 discussions

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-02-12 01:29, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 11 Feb 2013, at 19:26, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote: Hello! What happened to Mentec and the PDP-11 support after DEC made the silly decision to spin the division off? And yes you should. The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. You've just reminded me that I want a TOAD-1. ;) There is one person here on this list who do have one... :-) Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

12 years, 3 months

PDP-10s, was Re: [HECnet] NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 02/12/2013 01:38 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote: The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. I could also say that everything that's going on is Dave's fault, but that would be too easy. I'm blaming it on Sampsa ignoring the tribble near him. That is most certainly NOT my fault; in fact there are two PDP-10s here that will be up and running (and on HECnet!) if someone can hook me up with some MASSBUS drives. What kind of PDP10? A pair of KS10s. (you know the ones) One has a bad console board (I can fix it, just need to find the time) but the other should be functional. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

12 years, 3 months

NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-02-12 01:26, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! What happened to Mentec and the PDP-11 support after DEC made the silly decision to spin the division off? And yes you should. The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. Mentec continued on for about 10 years, and then disappeared in a puff of smoke. However, during those 10 years (take or give a few), first DEC, then Compaq then HP continued to support and sell PDP-11 software, even though Mentec was the guys owning and developing. When Mentec Inc. did disappear, the software bits were bought out by another company. And that is where it sits today. If we could get HP to actually release the IP for this software, then maybe something hobbyist-like could happen, but as it sits right now, HP control bits and pieces, making it a very complex situation. I'm not sure if you can still contact HP and get a new license for RSX, but it might be. But getting anyone to legally release the stuff seems difficult. :-( The PDP-10 wasn't just an "interesting system". It was the foundation of parts of the Internet, and was very prolific in the 70s, into the 80s. However, DEC totally failed to come up with a replacement to the KL-10, and eventually they instead decided that it was VAX only (even to the unhappy PDP-11 people, as Paul referred to). Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

12 years, 3 months

PDP-10s, was Re: [HECnet] NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by roll＠Stupi.SE

On 02/11/2013 07:26 PM, Gregg Levine wrote: The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. I could also say that everything that's going on is Dave's fault, but that would be too easy. I'm blaming it on Sampsa ignoring the tribble near him. That is most certainly NOT my fault; in fact there are two PDP-10s here that will be up and running (and on HECnet!) if someone can hook me up with some MASSBUS drives. What kind of PDP10? -P

12 years, 3 months

Tru64, was Re: [HECnet] NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by b4＠gewt.net

On 11 Feb 2013, at 19:34, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: On 02/11/2013 07:29 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Now i've been reminded of that episode of Space Mall errr Deep Space 9 where they green screened the characters in to that TOS episode... They did a tremendously good job on that. Yes. Yes they did. Does anyone happen to have a Tru64 license kit? I could use it for my ES40. ;) The last time this came up, I was told on very good authority that Tru64 uses the same sort of license PAKs (for which I have a generator) that VMS uses. I'd need OSF-BASE and UNIX-SERVER I think. Try and generate them and i'll see if they work. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

12 years, 3 months

Tru64, was Re: [HECnet] NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 02/11/2013 07:29 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Now i've been reminded of that episode of Space Mall errr Deep Space 9 where they green screened the characters in to that TOS episode... They did a tremendously good job on that. Does anyone happen to have a Tru64 license kit? I could use it for my ES40. ;) The last time this came up, I was told on very good authority that Tru64 uses the same sort of license PAKs (for which I have a generator) that VMS uses. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

12 years, 3 months

PDP-10s, was Re: [HECnet] NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

12 years, 3 months

NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by b4＠gewt.net

On 11 Feb 2013, at 19:26, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-02-11 22:43, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Mark Benson wrote: On 11 Feb 2013, at 21:02, Dave McGuire wrote: You know DEC, they loved supporting legacy products almost into oblivion. Yes, for GOOD products As much as I'd like to agree, it didn't necessarily work that way round. It was more a case of 'is someone important still using this? Then we best not ditch them or it'll look awfully bad... and they'll go and buy an IBM/DataGeneral/etc.' :) Not even that. For example, shortly after the 11/780 was announced, there was a definite (and, as I recall, explicitly stated) push to drop all PDP-11 support ASAP. For that matter, when IAS was announced, RSTS customers were told that IAS was the future and they should move there right away. Not long after that, IAS was recognized for the boat anchor it was, and it remained an obscure niche product. So DEC definitely had a history of angering customers by attempting to drop support for products that were very much alive and in some cases superior to the alleged replacement. Of course, they sometimes did get it right, as in the example of TRAX... :-) Is this the time I should mention the PDP-10? Talk about making customers angry... :-) Speaking of IAS, it really looks cool when reading specs, but I've never touched it, and another aspect of those specs is that it looks like it would be rather slow... Never seen TRAX in real life either, btw. What was so good about it? Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol Hello! What happened to Mentec and the PDP-11 support after DEC made the silly decision to spin the division off? And yes you should. The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. You've just reminded me that I want a TOAD-1. ;) I could also say that everything that's going on is Dave's fault, but that would be too easy. I'm blaming it on Sampsa ignoring the tribble near him. Now i've been reminded of that episode of Space Mall errr Deep Space 9 where they green screened the characters in to that TOS episode... ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." Does anyone happen to have a Tru64 license kit? I could use it for my ES40. ;)

12 years, 3 months

NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-02-11 22:43, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Mark Benson wrote: On 11 Feb 2013, at 21:02, Dave McGuire wrote: You know DEC, they loved supporting legacy products almost into oblivion. Yes, for GOOD products As much as I'd like to agree, it didn't necessarily work that way round. It was more a case of 'is someone important still using this? Then we best not ditch them or it'll look awfully bad... and they'll go and buy an IBM/DataGeneral/etc.' :) Not even that. For example, shortly after the 11/780 was announced, there was a definite (and, as I recall, explicitly stated) push to drop all PDP-11 support ASAP. For that matter, when IAS was announced, RSTS customers were told that IAS was the future and they should move there right away. Not long after that, IAS was recognized for the boat anchor it was, and it remained an obscure niche product. So DEC definitely had a history of angering customers by attempting to drop support for products that were very much alive and in some cases superior to the alleged replacement. Of course, they sometimes did get it right, as in the example of TRAX... :-) Is this the time I should mention the PDP-10? Talk about making customers angry... :-) Speaking of IAS, it really looks cool when reading specs, but I've never touched it, and another aspect of those specs is that it looks like it would be rather slow... Never seen TRAX in real life either, btw. What was so good about it? Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol Hello! What happened to Mentec and the PDP-11 support after DEC made the silly decision to spin the division off? And yes you should. The PDP-10 was an interesting system and one lived for a long time in the basement of an MIT building during the middle 90s. I could also say that everything that's going on is Dave's fault, but that would be too easy. I'm blaming it on Sampsa ignoring the tribble near him. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

12 years, 3 months

NT 4 on AlphaServer es40

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-02-11 23:33, Mark Benson wrote: On 11 Feb 2013, at 21:41, Dave McGuire wrote: That I won't argue with. That reminds me, I need to get my PDP-11 emulation back up and running. I'm actually missing using RSX-11 M+ (there's something wrong with me, I swear. It's Johnny's fault! :P ). EVERYTHING is Johnny's fault. ;) Bring up that PDP-11! (even if it's not real iron!) Eh, Ma ana. It takes me over an hour to do a fresh SYSGEN and NETGEN and I haven't done it in ages so I'll be out of practice. On an emulator? I takes me a little over an hour to do a SYSGEN on a real 11/93. I do want to get it running again though and delve a little deeper into RSX-11 :) If you ever do, feel free to ask questions. I think I'm getting close to figuring out all the weird stuff of the internals at this point... Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

12 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet