On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I'm neither a kid nor a gamer. Perhaps you're confusing the business vs.
consumer services? They are quite different; they don't even share a
network infrastructure.
-Dave
On 02/12/2013 12:02 AM, Dan B wrote:
they are fast, is a good service for kids and gamers, but no security
and big brother attitudes, besids being known to be a front end in the
pockets of obscure washington DC moves
On 2/11/13, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
"They're using sophisticated technology to degrade service, which
probably costs them a lot of money. It would be better to see them use
that money to improve service"
So why is anyone (Dave) buying their service?
-P
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
Dave when I offered my line of complaining and probably ranting and
definitely an illogical statement I was thinking of both consumer and
business ones and should have indicated what goes where. Sadly Cox
knows <Yiddish word meaning "nothing"> about both, and TWC almost
does, and AT&T is beginning to realize that really goofed by spinning
off their businesses where I am.
But you're still right.
**Abruptly there is a loud crash and six garbage cans fall over and
dump their contents.**
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 02/12/2013 12:11 AM, Dan B wrote:
They are known for letting in warrantless searches on all their
customers data,
???
The only data of mine that they have is my name, address, and telephone number. I'm not really too worried about that.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I'm neither a kid nor a gamer. Perhaps you're confusing the business vs. consumer services? They are quite different; they don't even share a network infrastructure.
-Dave
On 02/12/2013 12:02 AM, Dan B wrote:
they are fast, is a good service for kids and gamers, but no security
and big brother attitudes, besids being known to be a front end in the
pockets of obscure washington DC moves
On 2/11/13, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
"They're using sophisticated technology to degrade service, which
probably costs them a lot of money. It would be better to see them use
that money to improve service"
So why is anyone (Dave) buying their service?
-P
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
They are known for letting in warrantless searches on all their
customers data, comcast is some sort in a strange position, they have
huge debt and they need to have as much help from washingto, wall
With EPS of $2.19 and dividend of $0.65 I don't se how the can be in
deep trouble?
-P
From: Brett Bump <bbump at rsts.org>
Domain Name:XX2247.ORG
Registrant Name:John Wilson
Registrant Organization:XX2247
Ah, ha ha ha ha! Ok, John fess up. What is the real scoop? ;-)
Actually unrelated! I set that up ages ago for a documentation project
that I'm, um, still getting around to. Other than the obvious name, it's
nothing to do with the XX2247 which may or may not own the PDP-11 software.
(And thanks Dave McGuire for the key in the blurry picture!)
John Wilson
D Bit
@Gregg Levine - Nice photo by the way.
Fred (AKA charman miao,) us a really funny guy, one of the best cats
we ever had.
;-)
On 2/11/13, Dan B <dibi58 at gmail.com> wrote:
They are known for letting in warrantless searches on all their
customers data, comcast is some sort in a strange position, they have
huge debt and they need to have as much help from washingto, wall
street and hollywood as they can get, in so they provide some
"friendly" ways to make everybody happy, such as hiring politicians
family members, foraging politics with extensive lobbying, permitting
warrantless monitoring of their customers, blocking protocols that
hollywood does not like, et cetera.
I'm not an English native speaker either, forgive me for the slang there.
On 2/11/13, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
a front end in the pockets of obscure washington DC moves
I'm not a english speaker, please explain.
-P
They are known for letting in warrantless searches on all their
customers data, comcast is some sort in a strange position, they have
huge debt and they need to have as much help from washingto, wall
street and hollywood as they can get, in so they provide some
"friendly" ways to make everybody happy, such as hiring politicians
family members, foraging politics with extensive lobbying, permitting
warrantless monitoring of their customers, blocking protocols that
hollywood does not like, et cetera.
I'm not an English native speaker either, forgive me for the slang there.
On 2/11/13, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
a front end in the pockets of obscure washington DC moves
I'm not a english speaker, please explain.
-P
they are fast, is a good service for kids and gamers, but no security
and big brother attitudes, besids being known to be a front end in the
pockets of obscure washington DC moves
On 2/11/13, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
"They're using sophisticated technology to degrade service, which
probably costs them a lot of money. It would be better to see them use
that money to improve service"
So why is anyone (Dave) buying their service?
-P
"They're using sophisticated technology to degrade service, which
probably costs them a lot of money. It would be better to see them use
that money to improve service"
So why is anyone (Dave) buying their service?
-P