Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> writes:
(bumping an old thread)
Johnny,
excuse my ignorance, but how do I execute your fix.cmd inside NCP? Is =
there a VMS DCL one-liner that I can type that will execute NCP and =
cause it to run your script? =20
$ PIPE MCR NCP < FIX.CMD
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
(bumping an old thread)
Johnny,
excuse my ignorance, but how do I execute your fix.cmd inside NCP? Is there a VMS DCL one-liner that I can type that will execute NCP and cause it to run your script?
Thanks!
Ian
On 2013-01-29, at 10:53 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-01-29 19:48, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Johnny
Did you manage to fix the problem with mim not reporting the full node list? It's about time I grabbed an updated copy (with all of the new additions) but I didn't want to grab something that was corrupt.
I've been fighting MIM about that, but for some reason it just will not cooperate. I have two solutons for you:
1. Copy each area as individual commands (MIM knows it all, it just seems that the list of known nodes does not list all known nodes now. Bug in NCP methinks at this point...)
2. Grab MIM::US:[DECNET]FIX.CMD which contains all the DEFINE commands for NCP for all the nodes, and run it in NCP on your machine.
I can create command files in other formats easily if there are any special requests. Just let me know...
Johnny
Ian
On 2013-01-29, at 10:45 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-01-29 17:22, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On 1/21/2013 5:36 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 01/21/2013 05:20 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
A17RTR:: would work... :)
Hey, that's a good scheme. I will likely do that as well.
Several areas already do that. :-)
Excellent. :-) Would you please remove "GW" at 61.1 and add
"A61RTR" as 61.1023?
Sign me up for that as well.
Please add A52RTR as 52.1023
Done.
Johnny
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=0C3058926A4411E28…
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=33556D626A4511E2B…
On 2/18/2013 9:01 AM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Fred<fcoffey at misernet.net> writes:
Hi all:
Sent a message from Alpha (woops) and wondered why it didn't make it to
the list. ;)
Let's try again. Was wondering if anyone had kit for Language Sensitive
Editor. I notice the hobbyist licenses contain a PAK for it, and was
curious it would be a "better" (1) solution for editing code other than
using TPU.
LSE is in the DECSET tool kit. If you find a kit for DECSET, you can then
selectively install the pieces in it that you desire.
LSE is built on/with TPU, BTW.
If you get a Hobbyist license and then ask for access to the HP FTP sites DECset is included in both the Alpha and Itanium downloads. Possibly the VAX but an older version.
I always thought LSE was built with TPU.
John H. Reinhardt
On 18 Feb 2013, at 16:01, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Fred <fcoffey at misernet.net> writes:
Hi all:
Sent a message from Alpha (woops) and wondered why it didn't make it to
the list. ;)
Let's try again. Was wondering if anyone had kit for Language Sensitive
Editor. I notice the hobbyist licenses contain a PAK for it, and was
curious it would be a "better" (1) solution for editing code other than
using TPU.
LSE is in the DECSET tool kit. If you find a kit for DECSET, you can then
selectively install the pieces in it that you desire.
LSE is built on/with TPU, BTW.
You need a kit for AXP or VAX?
sampsa
Fred <fcoffey at misernet.net> writes:
Hi all:
Sent a message from Alpha (woops) and wondered why it didn't make it to
the list. ;)
Let's try again. Was wondering if anyone had kit for Language Sensitive
Editor. I notice the hobbyist licenses contain a PAK for it, and was
curious it would be a "better" (1) solution for editing code other than
using TPU.
LSE is in the DECSET tool kit. If you find a kit for DECSET, you can then
selectively install the pieces in it that you desire.
LSE is built on/with TPU, BTW.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
Hi all:
Sent a message from Alpha (woops) and wondered why it didn't make it to the list. ;)
Let's try again. Was wondering if anyone had kit for Language Sensitive Editor. I notice the hobbyist licenses contain a PAK for it, and was curious it would be a "better" (1) solution for editing code other than using TPU.
(1) for various definitions of better
Thanks,
Fred
----
Lets call it for what it is - "legacy" is a term that people use in a
polite but derogatory manner to imply that the future direction they
prefer is not that which they view as the current direction.
----- Original Message -----
| From: "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se>
| To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
| Sent: Sunday, 17 February, 2013 6:55:47 PM
| Subject: [HECnet] IRC
|
| I think I mentioned writing an IRC robot for RSX quite a while ago.
| Well, tonight I was bored after the last week of major rewrite of
| parts
| of the TCP layer in RSX, so I write a small bot.
|
| It is really stupid, but it works, and is running right now.
|
| You can find it on the #update channel on efnet. It's called
| cookiejar,
| and it responds if you send a message in the form of "cookiejar:
| cookie".
| (It do have some more tricks in there, but essentially that's it.)
|
| The source can be found on MIM::DU:[IRCBOT]IRCBOT.B2S, and is a total
| of
| 163 lines of code.
|
| Now I need some new project. :-)
Want to patch a linux kernel module for me? ;)
|
| Johnny
|
| --
| Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
| || on a psychedelic trip
| email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
| pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
|
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
http://dev.gimme-sympathy.org Home experiments
I think I mentioned writing an IRC robot for RSX quite a while ago. Well, tonight I was bored after the last week of major rewrite of parts of the TCP layer in RSX, so I write a small bot.
It is really stupid, but it works, and is running right now.
You can find it on the #update channel on efnet. It's called cookiejar, and it responds if you send a message in the form of "cookiejar: cookie".
(It do have some more tricks in there, but essentially that's it.)
The source can be found on MIM::DU:[IRCBOT]IRCBOT.B2S, and is a total of 163 lines of code.
Now I need some new project. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 02/17/2013 02:38 AM, Dan B wrote:
Heh. C'mon. It's a GIGANTIC commercial platform. People who aren't
porting to OS X now will be porting to OS X later.
Dave, I would not be so sure. I'm more inclined to think that Apple
may bail out entirely from that market, like HP seems to be
evaluating, for Apple, the iLine of gadgets is the bread and butter.
Could be, we'll see.
For now if you "have to" run on OSX, I would stick to VAX, on Simh and
GXEmul, both supported, the future may bring better news and options,
QEMU-KVM maybe one.
"Have to"? I've never understood that particular concept in
computing. Nobody tells me what to run, ever.
But either way...OS X is becoming easier to port to, but more
difficult at the same time...the latter only for developers who lack
discipline. On one hand, it's becoming more "standard" UNIX-like, while
on the other, they keep adding these weird proprietary extensions.
Let's just say I dumped OS X after 10.6 for some very good reasons. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Heh. C'mon. It's a GIGANTIC commercial platform. People who aren't
porting to OS X now will be porting to OS X later.
Dave, I would not be so sure. I'm more inclined to think that Apple
may bail out entirely from that market, like HP seems to be
evaluating, for Apple, the iLine of gadgets is the bread and butter.
For now if you "have to" run on OSX, I would stick to VAX, on Simh and
GXEmul, both supported, the future may bring better news and options,
QEMU-KVM maybe one.
On 2/16/13, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 02/16/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Holmes wrote:
Just looked like there wasn't any more efforts focusing on Mac OS X,
since its not a large commercial platform.
Heh. C'mon. It's a GIGANTIC commercial platform. People who aren't
porting to OS X now will be porting to OS X later.
Better yet, though, would be to write the software in a portable
fashion in the first place, and avoid using OS X's hokey whiz-bang
"extensions" to UNIX. Then, very litte "porting" will be necessary,
whichever direction you're going. It's readily possible; I've been
doing it for years.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
