On 2014-05-24 12:11, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
Node 10.1
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Node 10.2
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Shouldn't be AA-00-04-00-01-28 and AA-00-04-00-02-28 ?
The line information tells you what the *hardware* MAC address is.
Try "SHOW EXEC STAT" instead. :-)
Both nodes under simh.
The network is working, however.
Is it required to SET XQ MAC to match node address?
I guess it might depend on the version of simh and host system.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-24 11:52, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
SET /UIC=[1,24]
SET /UIC=[200,200]
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
Clean install. Autoconfiguration. Followed all suggestions. This is
getting _ANNOYING_.
This with M+ 4.6?
I seem to remember seeing a bug reported at some point that might be this.
If I remember right then it's just a stupid small error. Try editing [200,200]SGNPREFIX.CMD, and add the following line somewhere appropriate:
.SETF $U$DAS
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-24 11:39, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
DLV11-J, DHV11, DELQA, MSCP SCSI controller
All of those should fit at the standard addresses I believe.
Like I said. A DHV11 do not have a standard address. They only live in the floating space.
Anyway:
With this setup, the DHV11 should be at 160440.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
Whoops. 16 felt too small to me so I assumed 18. ;)
IND only do 16-bit arithmetic. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Node 10.1
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Node 10.2
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Shouldn't be AA-00-04-00-01-28 and AA-00-04-00-02-28 ?
Both nodes under simh.
The network is working, however.
Is it required to SET XQ MAC to match node address?
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
SET /UIC=[1,24]
SET /UIC=[200,200]
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
Clean install. Autoconfiguration. Followed all suggestions. This is getting _ANNOYING_.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
DLV11-J, DHV11, DELQA, MSCP SCSI controller
All of those should fit at the standard addresses I believe.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
Whoops. 16 felt too small to me so I assumed 18. ;)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the
networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Good.
Yeah. Assuming I can get it on to DU1...which is set as an RA81 for PLENTY of disk.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the
networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Good.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-24 11:18, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-23 20:42, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again? I'd love to
not have to rely on my incorrect answers. ;)
I think not. Autoconfigure is only run if you are on the baseline
system, if I remember right.
However, that then also depends on you setting the CSR right. You know
about the rules for CSR assignments, right?
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the floating space.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
