Doh! The results of not reading all mails in the inbox before updating...
As long as we're at it, how about calling it A5RTR, to match the pattern used in other areas?
Johnny
On 2012-09-22 22:59, Rob Jarratt wrote:
Yes, I meant A5ROUT, not sure what I was thinking. In fact I intend to
change it to 5.1023, so please set it up at 5.1023 and I will change it at
the next restart of the router.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: 22 September 2012 14:37
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Node list update
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing
else
Everybody else can know its name, even if it's not smart enough to know
its
own name :-)
If you want a name anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
If it's A4ROUT (as in area 4 router?) how come it's in area 5?
Just wondering...
Bob
Uhhh... Maybe A5ROUT? :-)
Johnny
On 2012-09-22 11:33, Rob Jarratt wrote:
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing else,
you can't SET HOST to it, DIR it or anything like that. If you want a name
anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 22 September 2012 10:07
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Node list update
On 2012-09-21 19:35, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Please add this machine to the nodelist:
7.72 BITXOM (SIMH PDP11, RSX11M 4.8)
Done.
And, by the way, I don't have the node name for 5.99, neither it is in
MIM::
I know. I've tried poking Rob about that, but don't have a name for it...
The number of areas and machines online is looking pretty impressive
nowadays, though. Nice!
Johnny
On 2012-09-22 11:33, Rob Jarratt wrote:
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing else,
you can't SET HOST to it, DIR it or anything like that. If you want a name
anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
What do you mean "can't have a hostname"? Of course it can. It has a node number, right? A node name is just a more convenient way to refer to a node number.
A4ROUT it is then...
Johnny
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 22 September 2012 10:07
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Node list update
On 2012-09-21 19:35, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Please add this machine to the nodelist:
7.72 BITXOM (SIMH PDP11, RSX11M 4.8)
Done.
And, by the way, I don't have the node name for 5.99, neither it is in
MIM::
I know. I've tried poking Rob about that, but don't have a name for it...
The number of areas and machines online is looking pretty impressive
nowadays, though. Nice!
Johnny
Yes, I meant A5ROUT, not sure what I was thinking. In fact I intend to
change it to 5.1023, so please set it up at 5.1023 and I will change it at
the next restart of the router.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: 22 September 2012 14:37
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Node list update
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing
else
Everybody else can know its name, even if it's not smart enough to know
its
own name :-)
If you want a name anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
If it's A4ROUT (as in area 4 router?) how come it's in area 5?
Just wondering...
Bob
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing else
Everybody else can know its name, even if it's not smart enough to know
its own name :-)
If you want a name anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
If it's A4ROUT (as in area 4 router?) how come it's in area 5?
Just wondering...
Bob
5.99 can't have a name because it is only a DECnet router and nothing else,
you can't SET HOST to it, DIR it or anything like that. If you want a name
anyway let's call it A4ROUT.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 22 September 2012 10:07
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Node list update
On 2012-09-21 19:35, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Please add this machine to the nodelist:
7.72 BITXOM (SIMH PDP11, RSX11M 4.8)
Done.
And, by the way, I don't have the node name for 5.99, neither it is in
MIM::
I know. I've tried poking Rob about that, but don't have a name for it...
The number of areas and machines online is looking pretty impressive
nowadays, though. Nice!
Johnny
On 2012-09-21 19:35, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Please add this machine to the nodelist:
7.72 BITXOM (SIMH PDP11, RSX11M 4.8)
Done.
And, by the way, I don't have the node name for 5.99, neither it is in MIM::
I know. I've tried poking Rob about that, but don't have a name for it...
The number of areas and machines online is looking pretty impressive nowadays, though. Nice!
Johnny
On 21/09/12 04:51, Kari Uusim ki wrote:
On 21.9.2012 2:56, Mark Wickens wrote:
Hi guys,
Does anyone have the DEC RDB Version 6.1 developers kit. I have the
December 1995 ConDist which *should* have it on, but for some
inexplicable reason the .C saveset is missing from the CDROM (.A, .B, .D
etc...)
Regards, Mark
.
Which one do you need; VAX or Alpha?
I'll check what I can find.
Regards,
Kari
VAX please.
Yes, I tried to install it - it fails loading saveset C.
I have installed 5.1 without issue.
Regards, Mark.
Have you tried to install it?
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Mark Wickens
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at update.uu.se
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] DEC RDB 6.1 Kit
Verzonden: 21 september 2012 01:56
Hi guys,
Does anyone have the DEC RDB Version 6.1 developers kit. I have the
December 1995 ConDist which *should* have it on, but for some inexplicable
reason the .C saveset is missing from the CDROM (.A, .B, .D etc...)
Regards, Mark
