On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 1 Nov 2012, at 16:18, Cory Smelosky wrote:
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) link them together with simh's serial line emulation and simulate modems...unless we do KERMIT crontabs.
Dude, we have a UUCP network ready to go lol: http://www.uuhec.net/
I had no idea this already existed. How did I miss this?!
Sampsa
< br>
On 1 Nov 2012, at 16:18, Cory Smelosky wrote:
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) link them together with simh's serial line emulation and simulate modems...unless we do KERMIT crontabs.
Dude, we have a UUCP network ready to go lol: http://www.uuhec.net/
Sampsa
On 1 Nov 2012, at 14:17, "Bob Armstrong" <bob at jfcl.com> wrote:
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) ...
I still like the idea of UUCP / POTS links. ...
I would attempt this if I had modems that weren't just soft modems.
Might be able to use them if any of you know of any nice software for use
on a BSD with them.
You guys do know that there exists UUCP, et al, for VMS? No need to use
Unix. Or maybe I missed the original point?
Mmm, good point. As it seems UUCP also runs on DOS, CP/M, and Mac OS as well so it might make more sense to modify the plan to also include other OSes. ;)
Bob
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) ...
I still like the idea of UUCP / POTS links. ...
I would attempt this if I had modems that weren't just soft modems.
Might be able to use them if any of you know of any nice software for use
on a BSD with them.
You guys do know that there exists UUCP, et al, for VMS? No need to use
Unix. Or maybe I missed the original point?
Bob
On 1 Nov 2012, at 10:52, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Joe Ferraro <jferraro at gmail.com> wrote:
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) link them together with simh's serial line emulation and simulate modems...unless we do KERMIT crontabs.
I still like the idea of UUCP / POTS links. IIRC, Sampsa or Steve had something going along these lines a while back. Not sure if it ever got off the ground?!?
I would attempt this if I had modems that weren't just soft modems. Might be able to use them if any of you know of any nice software for use on a BSD with them.
Update: I have 2 modems to try from that I can find
1). A winmodem
2). A Conexant HSF modem
who thinks I can get one of these working in MS-DOS? MS-DOS on a HT P4 with 1G RAM anyone?
I know it's not a UNIX but maybe the driver will show me a serial port I can attach a simulator to?
On Nov 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Joe Ferraro <jferraro at gmail.com> wrote:
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) link them together with simh's serial line emulation and simulate modems...unless we do KERMIT crontabs.
I still like the idea of UUCP / POTS links. IIRC, Sampsa or Steve had something going along these lines a while back. Not sure if it ever got off the ground?!?
I would attempt this if I had modems that weren't just soft modems. Might be able to use them if any of you know of any nice software for use on a BSD with them.
We could also set up a little UUCP and NNTP on UNIX VMs network ;) link them together with simh's serial line emulation and simulate modems...unless we do KERMIT crontabs.
I still like the idea of UUCP / POTS links. IIRC, Sampsa or Steve had something going along these lines a while back. Not sure if it ever got off the ground?!?
On 2012-11-01 06:26, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:24 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
I've decided to leave my PDP-11/53 up and running for awhile. The
recent temperature decrease in my area may have been a factor in this
decision. ;) It may go up and down, but it should be up most of the time.
It is MECCA, node 61.4. The login is "10,1" and the password is
"hecnet", sans brackets and quotes.
FORTRAN, BP2, and C are installed.
Log in and have fun!
Oh, and remember, from VMS, you'll need to be coming from a pre-8.x
machine (as far as I can tell), using "SET HOST/APPL=RTERM MECCA". You
may need to hop through something.
Johnny, maybe you can test login from an RSX system?
Works, just like Oleg reported. However, why is the date set to 1999 on that system? It's RSTS/E V10.1, that should be Y2K capable.
I also had a chance to notice that RSX (apparently like VMS) tries CTERM first, and when that fails, it falls back to trying RTERM. However, it tries the RSX flavour, which also fails.
But RRS works fine.
Johnny
Don't forget we'd need an ERP to maintain list subscribers, their contacts and equipment.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 9:49, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Oh I know, let's build some huge monstrosity consisting of Java 2 EE, PHP and NoSQL, with some legacy PL/I thrown in for fun. Then make it web-based with a UI designed by somebody with BOTH synaesthesia and colour-blindness, with a fondness for the "Icons are all pretty much the same as long as they're roundrects".
Maybe I should stop working with "enterprise" software.
Sampsa
On 1 Nov 2012, at 15:45, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:28:39PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-10-31 19:48, RCS/RI info wrote:
How do I set my subscription to this list to digest mode? I tried the standard majordomo commands without success.
Good question. I'm not sure if the (old version of) majordomo we're
running have that function.
hah.. we are running the latest version of majordomo, which is > 10
years old. I've patched it to work with later perl versions. But now I'm
trying to stay out of it. There has been talk of giving majordomo the
boot and install something else.
/P
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012, Fred wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Maybe I should stop working with "enterprise" software.
I know ! I know !
What about Micro$oft .NET ? :) (ducks)
Just kidding of course.
Being serious for a moment, what about mailman?
Mailman is what we've been looking at as the most likely replacement.
Whenever we get around to it.. :)
/Jesper
