On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :(
Not at a price you can afford , no. :)
Unless I convince OAR.net I am doing legitimate educational research in the field of computer history/aracheology, correct. ;)
3/3 symmetric T1 w/ 5 static IPs is $549/mo. Hmmmm.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 02/16/2014 10:02 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us".
What did you do to make Comcast mad at you?
Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook,
google and apple.
I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to
themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need
on-net...
That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I
don't think I'll get that here, though. :(
I have a non-residential ISP. I am on Comcast *business*.
Non-throttled, unmetered bandwidth, excellent performance, excellent
stability, static IP addresses (statically-allocated IP addresses...not
just "my IP address hardly ever changes!" crap that a lot of people
think means "static" these days), and the FIRST person that answers the
phone can log into a DNS server and update PTR records for me.
And Peter's network cannot reach my network. WTF?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Feb 16, 2014, at 22:02, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us".
What did you do to make Comcast mad at you?
Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook,
google and apple.
I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to
themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need
on-net...
That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :(
Not at a price you can afford , no. :)
On 02/17/2014 04:06 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us".
What did you do to make Comcast mad at you?
Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook,
google and apple.
I access machines all over the world, all day, every day. I honestly
have yet to have problems elsewhere.
US has a problem (self created..)
We have MANY self-created problems. :-(
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us".
What did you do to make Comcast mad at you?
Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook,
google and apple.
I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to
themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need
on-net...
US has a problem (self created..)
-P
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :(
Not at a price you can afford , no. :)
Unless I convince OAR.net I am doing legitimate educational research in the field of computer history/aracheology, correct. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us".
What did you do to make Comcast mad at you?
Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook,
google and apple.
I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to
themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need
on-net...
That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :(
US has a problem (self created..)
-P
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Please remember that the USA has piss poort Internet services compared
to the rest of the world, despite our best efforts.
Internet is fine, It just don't include Comcast....
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:HFR1-F#sh int POS0/3/0/0
POS0/3/0/0 is up, line protocol is up (APS not Configured )
Interface state transitions: 2
Hardware is Packet over SONET/SDH
Description: OC768 Private Peering to Sunet <ip at nordu.net>
Internet address is 193.11.20.146/30
MTU 4474 bytes, BW 39813120 Kbit (Max: 39813120 Kbit)
reliability 255/255, txload 0/255, rxload 0/255
Encapsulation HDLC, crc 32, controller loopback not set, keepalive
set (10 sec)
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
30 second input rate 1771000 bits/sec, 522 packets/sec
30 second output rate 2082000 bits/sec, 634 packets/sec
GigabitEthernet6/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is GigMac 1 Port 10 GigabitEthernet Plus, address is
0007.84ad.5e64 (bia 0007.84ad.5e64)
Description: PNI to Tele2 NetnOd ODF fib 3-4 min SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
Internet address is 130.244.200.246/30
MTU 4470 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, rely 255/255, load
1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full Duplex, 10000Mbps, link type is force-up, media type is LR
1310nm
output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 52510 drops
5 minute input rate 3237000 bits/sec, 736 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 2729000 bits/sec, 668 packets/sec
GigabitEthernet7/0/0.15 is up, line protocol is up
Description: Netnod Exchange, Switch B
Hardware is GigMac 1 Port 10 GigabitEthernet, address is
0007.84ad.5eca (bia 0007.84ad.5eca)
Internet address is 194.68.128.34/24
MTU 4470 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, rely 255/255, load
1/255
Encapsulation 802.1Q Virtual LAN, Vlan ID 15.
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
GigabitEthernet7/0/0.15
Protocol Pkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
IP 1652086220 796727958713 4589018 2768817222
MPLS 0 0 0 0
IPv6 Unicast 4342154 1353546474 1826208 293546956
IPv6 Mcast 79762604 7189870792 0
Etc...
-P