Wow this takes me back. A group of us played about with something like this twenty odd years ago while writing a Boulderdash game in ADA to play on the campus 8800.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Julian Wolfe <julian at twinax.org> wrote:
I'd be surprised if anyone on here has actually messed with this, but I thought it was worth a shot.
On 2013-07-21 20:03, Julian Wolfe wrote:
I know this is a bit off-topic, but I was playing around with the DECDLD commands in the VT220 programmer's reference guide to make character graphics on the VT220 (I'm actually using Mac240, a VT220 emulator that has full DECDLD support at a VT220 level)
I'm having a problem getting characters to join at the top of the cell. The top two pixels don't seem to meet.
I see some material about VT320 but the addressing of the matrix seems quite different on that terminal.
I'm using 7-bit encoding to create the characters. Do I need to use 8-bit in order to use the full matrix?
I'd be surprised if anyone on here has actually messed with this, but I thought it was worth a shot.
I can also toss my work at whoever has a VT220 lying around to see if they can test it as well.
Any input is appreciated (as long as I can decode it, ha ha)
MIM::DU:[FED]
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I know this is a bit off-topic, but I was playing around with the DECDLD commands in the VT220 programmer's reference guide to make character graphics on the VT220 (I'm actually using Mac240, a VT220 emulator that has full DECDLD support at a VT220 level)
I'm having a problem getting characters to join at the top of the cell. The top two pixels don't seem to meet.
I see some material about VT320 but the addressing of the matrix seems quite different on that terminal.
I'm using 7-bit encoding to create the characters. Do I need to use 8-bit in order to use the full matrix?
I'd be surprised if anyone on here has actually messed with this, but I thought it was worth a shot.
I can also toss my work at whoever has a VT220 lying around to see if they can test it as well.
Any input is appreciated (as long as I can decode it, ha ha)
Julian
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:36, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:26:00AM -0000, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:23, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:15, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
65.19.130.45
I used the address the email told me to use. ;)
New config pulled. Is something not working on my end or has nobody else?s tunnel to me come up?
I think you aren't the only person to now follow directions. :)
Ah. ;)
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:35, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:23:22AM -0000, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:15, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
65.19.130.45
I used the address the email told me to use. ;)
The email told you to use 65.19.130.45, so no you didn't. :)
Mail.app sucks at sorting. ;)
The one you were using is the old one. The one you were supposed to STOP
using. :)
-brian
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:26:00AM -0000, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:23, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:15, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
65.19.130.45
I used the address the email told me to use. ;)
New config pulled. Is something not working on my end or has nobody else?s tunnel to me come up?
I think you aren't the only person to now follow directions. :)
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:23:22AM -0000, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:15, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
65.19.130.45
I used the address the email told me to use. ;)
The email told you to use 65.19.130.45, so no you didn't. :)
The one you were using is the old one. The one you were supposed to STOP
using. :)
-brian
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:23, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 20 Jul 2013, at 20:15, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
65.19.130.45
I used the address the email told me to use. ;)
New config pulled. Is something not working on my end or has nobody else s tunnel to me come up?