HECnet June 2013

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

33 participants
290 discussions

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-06-15 15:28, Bob Armstrong wrote: if a request comes in without any account information, VMS applies the default account as the user under which to run the request. Ah - and 11M+ can't do this? Didn't know that... Thanks. Right. No RSX have any default account for DECnet. However, M+ have proxy, which can be made to work pretty close. Johnny

11 years, 5 months

DECnet default access on RSX...

by bob＠jfcl.com

if a request comes in without any account information, VMS applies the default account as the user under which to run the request. Ah - and 11M+ can't do this? Didn't know that... Thanks. Bob

11 years, 5 months

DECnet default access on RSX...

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-06-15 14:59, Bob Armstrong wrote: My workaround for that is to use DECnet proxy information. However, I'm not sure that is available in 11M. Sadly, there is no proxy support on M - only M+. I still don't understand how it works when talking to a VMS system, though? LENTO is doing the same thing in either case, but with a VMS system on the far end all is well and with an RSX system on the other end it doesn't work. In all cases, if account information is passed in the request, it is used. For any OS. If no account information is passed, but both requesting node includes proxy information, and responding nodes make use of proxy information, this is used to get an account under which to process the reqeuest. With VMS, if a request comes in without any account information, VMS applies the default account as the user under which to run the request. The requesting node have no involvement in this. Johnny

11 years, 5 months

DECnet default access on RSX...

by bob＠jfcl.com

My workaround for that is to use DECnet proxy information. However, I'm not sure that is available in 11M. Sadly, there is no proxy support on M - only M+. I still don't understand how it works when talking to a VMS system, though? LENTO is doing the same thing in either case, but with a VMS system on the far end all is well and with an RSX system on the other end it doesn't work. Bob

11 years, 5 months

Losing my fixed IP

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-06-13 08:23, Mark Benson wrote: Due to the limits on our ability to get internet service of any decent speed, we're having to change packages meaning we will lose out fixed IP in November. I'd like to work towards being able to stay on HECnet before then using STAR69 to maintain my connection. Well, do you know if you'll get different addresses often? Many ISPs give dynamic IP addresses, but you actually stay on the same address for months, which makes it a rather small problem. I haven't had a change in address in over 6 months myself. Johnny

11 years, 5 months

DECnet default access on RSX...

by bqt＠softjar.se

Hi, Bob. On 2013-06-13 15:11, Bob Armstrong wrote: or What I know about DECnet-11 (several things, undoubtedly :-) I have a DECnet-11 RSX-11M (no + !) system, LENTO. On LENTO I can say >NFT LEGATO::/LI [LEGATO is a VMS node] and I get a directory of the default DECnet account on LEGATO - exactly what I d expect to happen. But if I say >NFT MIM::DU:[4,54]/LI [MIM being an RSX node] I get NFT -- Error in reading directory MIM::DU:[4,54] Access control rejected On VMS this behavior is controlled by the SET EXECUTOR DEFAULT ACCESS characteristic, but DECnet-11 doesn t seem to have an equivalent. What s the secret to making this work on RSX? Right. The problem is that in RSX you do not have a default access account. My workaround for that is to use DECnet proxy information. However, I'm not sure that is available in 11M. But that is what you need to look for. I know of no other solution. Johnny

11 years, 5 months

TELL.COM?

by sampsa＠mac.com

Anyone have a copy of this (with install docs?) sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +961 788 10537

11 years, 5 months

New node

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

One more for the list: Name: BITXOU Address: 7.82 OS: VAX Ultrix V4.0 CPU: Emulated microvax 3900 Physical Location: Barcelona (Catalonia)

11 years, 5 months

RE: [DECtec] Slight OT: SIMH Framebuffer support

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm <Mark at infocomm.com> wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Mark Pizzolato wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sampsa Laine write: This looks cool, anyone try it? http://www.9track.net/simh/video/ Hi Sampsa, How timely of you to observe this today. Just last night I got code pieces from Matt Burke (the guy at 9track.net) to add VCB01 (QVSS) support to the simh codebase for the MicroVAX I and MicroVAX II simulators. I'm in the process of merging that code and adding the necessary build mechanisms to the makefile as we speak. This will be cleaned up and visible at https://github.com/simh/simh in at most a couple of days.... For folks who build their own binaries, the latest github code has a VAXStation I and VAXStation II with the MonoChrome QVSS video capabilities. sim> SET CPU MODEL=VAXSTATION enables the video subsystem. The VAXStation I has a limit of 4MB of RAM, the VAXStation II has a limit of 16MB. The makefile should just build the right thing if the development support for libSDL is installed on your platform. Please provide bug reports and/or other feedback with issues created at https://github.com/simh/simh/issues There is a glitch in my scripts which build and package the windows binaries which is failing to build the simulators with video support, so folks who count on the Windows Binaries will have to wait until I fix this. Thanks. - Mark Pizzolato Hello! Nice to know Mark. Any suggestions for implementing it on a Raspberry Pi system w/ 512MB of memory? I did get the code outside of your screen idea to build properly. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

11 years, 5 months

[DECtec] [HECnet] RE: Slight OT: SIMH Framebuffer support

by Mark＠infocomm.com

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Mark Pizzolato wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sampsa Laine write: This looks cool, anyone try it? http://www.9track.net/simh/video/ Hi Sampsa, How timely of you to observe this today. Just last night I got code pieces from Matt Burke (the guy at 9track.net) to add VCB01 (QVSS) support to the simh codebase for the MicroVAX I and MicroVAX II simulators. I'm in the process of merging that code and adding the necessary build mechanisms to the makefile as we speak. This will be cleaned up and visible at https://github.com/simh/simh in at most a couple of days.... For folks who build their own binaries, the latest github code has a VAXStation I and VAXStation II with the MonoChrome QVSS video capabilities. sim> SET CPU MODEL=VAXSTATION enables the video subsystem. The VAXStation I has a limit of 4MB of RAM, the VAXStation II has a limit of 16MB. The makefile should just build the right thing if the development support for libSDL is installed on your platform. Please provide bug reports and/or other feedback with issues created at https://github.com/simh/simh/issues There is a glitch in my scripts which build and package the windows binaries which is failing to build the simulators with video support, so folks who count on the Windows Binaries will have to wait until I fix this. Thanks. - Mark Pizzolato -- DECtec mailing list http://dectec.info To unsubscribe from this list see page at: http://dectec.info/mailman/listinfo/dectec_dectec.info

11 years, 5 months

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
29
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet June 2013