Area 6 Reporting in:
2 nodes on constantly at the moment at 6.1 and 6.15
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
I got the Multinet license 5 days ago
------ ------
: Steve Davidson
: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
: [HECnet] Process.Com and Multinet
: 2 2012 20:31
Has anyone been able to get to PROCESS.COM lately? I am trying to get
their to renew my Multinet license but it keeps timing out. Until I get
this sorted out SG1:: will not be able to support tunnel links.
Thanks!
-Steve
BlackBerry
Well WHOIS also points at the US, mainly PA.
Israel eh? Sounds like someone got hijacked :)
Sampsa
On 2 Jul 2012, at 19:38, Marc Chametzky wrote:
Something looks amiss with their web server. I can get to the FTP server, though.
What did surprise me was that when I did a traceroute to www.process.com, it took me to Israel. I wonder whether that's correct or not.
The FTP server traceroutes more logically seemingly to Massachusetts somewhere.
--Marc
Something looks amiss with their web server. I can get to the FTP server, though.
What did surprise me was that when I did a traceroute to www.process.com, it took me to Israel. I wonder whether that's correct or not.
The FTP server traceroutes more logically seemingly to Massachusetts somewhere.
--Marc
Has anyone been able to get to PROCESS.COM lately?
The web site is not working for me, either.
They're in Framingham - that's about 90 minutes from you, right? You
could always drive by and see if the lights are on :-)
Process Software
959 Concord Street
Framingham, MA 01701
Phone: (800) 722-7770
(508) 879-6994
FAX: (508) 879-0042.
Bob
Has anyone been able to get to PROCESS.COM lately? I am trying to get
their to renew my Multinet license but it keeps timing out. Until I get
this sorted out SG1:: will not be able to support tunnel links.
Thanks!
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:10
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] This is probably been asked already but....
The PRO was for later VAXen. 8800-range, I think.
That must be where I saw it, because I remember a VAX with
what was clearly a PRO attached to it. We used to joke that
it was the only way DEC could sell the PROs :-)
The 86x0 uses a T11, and runs RT-11.
Was it like a FALCON/KXT11 board based thing, or some
custom T11 board?
How (where) did they get RT11 for it? The T11 had a few
oddities (e.g. no bus timeout traps) and AFAIK RT11 was never
supported on T11 systems. I've heard that there was an
unofficial, hacked up, copy of some RT11 release that would
work but I never saw a copy.
The 86x0 does in fact run a real version of RT-11. The disk sub-system
was a RL0x (can't remember if it was 1 or 2). It had its own set of
quirks - to say the least! The sources have macros to deal with the
T-11 differences. They were in the middle of the changes to RT-11 just
as I joined the group. One of the guys spent quite a bit of time in
Marlboro, MA trying to get the sub-system to deal with the RL0x.. It
was a beast! :-)
I've actually got a FALCON board, so it's more than just an
academic interest.
Bob
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Bob Armstrong <bob at jfcl.com> wrote:
The PRO was for later VAXen. 8800-range, I think.
That must be where I saw it, because I remember a VAX with what was
clearly a PRO attached to it. We used to joke that it was the only way DEC
could sell the PROs :-)
The 86x0 uses a T11, and runs RT-11.
Was it like a FALCON/KXT11 board based thing, or some custom T11 board?
How (where) did they get RT11 for it? The T11 had a few oddities (e.g. no
bus timeout traps) and AFAIK RT11 was never supported on T11 systems. I've
heard that there was an unofficial, hacked up, copy of some RT11 release
that would work but I never saw a copy.
I've actually got a FALCON board, so it's more than just an academic
interest.
Bob
Hello!
Ah now we are getting somewhere. That's the family of boards I'm
interested in. Any suggestions for obtaining one or any of them,
around here? (I'm in NYC.)
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
The PRO was for later VAXen. 8800-range, I think.
That must be where I saw it, because I remember a VAX with what was
clearly a PRO attached to it. We used to joke that it was the only way DEC
could sell the PROs :-)
The 86x0 uses a T11, and runs RT-11.
Was it like a FALCON/KXT11 board based thing, or some custom T11 board?
How (where) did they get RT11 for it? The T11 had a few oddities (e.g. no
bus timeout traps) and AFAIK RT11 was never supported on T11 systems. I've
heard that there was an unofficial, hacked up, copy of some RT11 release
that would work but I never saw a copy.
I've actually got a FALCON board, so it's more than just an academic
interest.
Bob
On 2012-07-02 17:01, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Was that the RTOS used with the T-11 (the first single-chip PDP-11?)
I seem to remember that it was used as the RTOS in the LA-120 printer.
Oh, and I almost forgot - the only use of RT11 that I know of for an
"embedded" system was the CFEs for the VAX 780 and 8600 (on a 11/03 in the
former and a PRO in the latter). Are there any more?
The 86x0 uses a T11, and runs RT-11. You can even get into the RT-11 system and play around, if you want to.
I'm not sure how complete a RT-11 system you had on the VAX-11/780, since it was living on a single RX01 (or was that RX02?)
The PRO was for later VAXen. 8800-range, I think. Anyway, that one ran P/OS, which is RSX derived.
Johnny
