HECnet July 2012

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

30 participants
249 discussions

Problem: I can't recall the website for the US based users group for VMS

by dibi58＠gmail.com

here, this is the manual, the ip or phones are probably obsolete, but this is the address: telnet decuserve.org and http://www.openvmshobbyist.com/licenses.php cheers ;-) On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote: Hello! Problem, this computer suffered an attack of typical Microsoft issues regarding its OS and required an installation of itself back about a month earlier. I ended up loosing my bookmarks. One of them was for the US based offices for the users group for VMS. As I recall and en examination of the form used to create the licensing string for VMS it requires that name. It also needs the member number from the group. I recall creating one for a kit that Sampsa has someplace last year, but I never managed to launch the Alpha emulator on any of the approved operating systems for it. Now I'm ready to try again with the VMS kit I have here someplace (it presupposes that I can find it, but I do know that the image can be downloaded...) and running on the SIMH Vax setup using the instructions on the site that the SIMH one is linked to. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

12 years, 4 months

Problem: I can't recall the website for the US based users group for VMS

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

On 6.7.2012 5:56, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! Problem, this computer suffered an attack of typical Microsoft issues regarding its OS and required an installation of itself back about a month earlier. I ended up loosing my bookmarks. One of them was for the US based offices for the users group for VMS. As I recall and en examination of the form used to create the licensing string for VMS it requires that name. It also needs the member number from the group. I recall creating one for a kit that Sampsa has someplace last year, but I never managed to launch the Alpha emulator on any of the approved operating systems for it. Now I'm ready to try again with the VMS kit I have here someplace (it presupposes that I can find it, but I do know that the image can be downloaded...) and running on the SIMH Vax setup using the instructions on the site that the SIMH one is linked to. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." . Do you mean Encompass? Kari

12 years, 4 months

DECnet MAIL

by wwweiss＠yandex.ru

06.07.2012, 10:07, "Igor Mirvaleev" <wwweiss at yandex.ru>: SMTP server not now disabled . SMTP server now disabled . Sorry for error

12 years, 4 months

DECnet MAIL

by wwweiss＠yandex.ru

Hello! Sorry for stupid question, but i can't understand why i get the "error activating transport SMTP" message when i try to send a mail to some host in HECnet, using DECnet MAIL utility and address in HOST::USER format? I have MultiNet installed, but i planned to use it only as gateway to HECnet communication, and don't want to use SMTP server on this machine. SMTP server not now disabled . I 've read that DECnet MAIL uses Mail-11 protocol, so why i get the error messages about SMTP? Thanks, Igor P.S. OS - OpenVMS 8.4, DECnet phase IV, Multinet 5.4. Communication by MAIL between users on same host works good.

12 years, 4 months

Problem: I can't recall the website for the US based users group for VMS

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

Hello! Problem, this computer suffered an attack of typical Microsoft issues regarding its OS and required an installation of itself back about a month earlier. I ended up loosing my bookmarks. One of them was for the US based offices for the users group for VMS. As I recall and en examination of the form used to create the licensing string for VMS it requires that name. It also needs the member number from the group. I recall creating one for a kit that Sampsa has someplace last year, but I never managed to launch the Alpha emulator on any of the approved operating systems for it. Now I'm ready to try again with the VMS kit I have here someplace (it presupposes that I can find it, but I do know that the image can be downloaded...) and running on the SIMH Vax setup using the instructions on the site that the SIMH one is linked to. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

12 years, 4 months

pdp-11/83-84

by jeep＠scshome.net

-----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Dave McGuire Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 03:53 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] pdp-11/83-84 On 07/05/2012 02:22 AM, Boyanich, Alastair wrote: Quick question. I've just snaffled an M8190-AE with what I think is the 21-21853-06 FPU as an upgrade for either the 11/70 or 11/23Plus at home. Nice! I've seen reference to CIS microcode for these boards about the place and am extremely keen to have a go at it with macro. I'm not "actually" sure if it has it in the PROMS, but being handy with a EPROM programmer hopefully I can find it. Does anyone have any reading material on how to figure out if the CIS microcode is installed ? Huh? That's a J-11 based board, and I'm pretty sure the CIS option for the J-11, while planned, was never actually shipped. It would have been two additional chip carriers on the bottom side of the big white J11 multi-carrier chip. The only ROMs on a KDJ11-Bx board contain the boot/diag code, not microcode, and conversely, the only microcode on a KDJ11-Bx (or any J11-based board for that matter) is in the microcode ROM, which is a part of the "control" chip, which is one the two chips on the J11 multi-chip carrier itself. No microaddress lines or any other internal state machine stuff is brought out to the pins of a J11. (sorry!) You CAN, however, get a CIS option (if you can find it!) for your 11/23! I too would love to mess with CIS a bit; I've never done so. I have two CIS option board sets for my 11/44s but have not yet installed them. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA The node PLUTO:: is a PDP-11/23+ with both CIS and FPU running RSTS/E. You can run an emulated one using SimH if you do not have the physical hardware. I have both running. You would be hard pressed to know if the system running (and connected to HECnet) was the real one or not! COBOL was the reason that CIS was designed for the 11/23+. Other languages can also make use of it. One that comes to mind is DIBOL. -Steve

12 years, 4 months

pdp-11/83-84

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 07/05/2012 09:00 PM, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote: On Jul 5, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: ... Oh, and I saw some additional discussions about the CIS option for the F11. Unless I remember wrong, and understood things wrong, it is not just a simple PROM. It's a coprocessor, which have logic in addition to whatever microcode the coprocessor need. So no way of just duplicating a PROM to get a CIS. Not unless someone could dig up the details. If it *is* just a PROM, even if it's an oddball bipolar model with different interface specs, it should be easy to reproduce that with a small FPGA. Any reasonable modern FPGA is way faster than a 1980s era bipolar ROM, so modeling the interface timing should be easy. And level conversions should be doable. So a sort of daughterboard? That's a good idea. I'm pretty sure the F11's manuals are out there, but I haven't gone digging for them. From that, and possibly even just from the KDF11-Bx schematics, one should be able to glean the important parts of how to interface to the microinstruction and microaddress buses. Then all we'd need is a copy of the actual code. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

12 years, 4 months

pdp-11/83-84

by Paul_Koning＠Dell.com

On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Steve Davidson wrote: ... The node PLUTO:: is a PDP-11/23+ with both CIS and FPU running RSTS/E. You can run an emulated one using SimH if you do not have the physical hardware. I have both running. You would be hard pressed to know if the system running (and connected to HECnet) was the real one or not! COBOL was the reason that CIS was designed for the 11/23+. Other languages can also make use of it. One that comes to mind is DIBOL. I don't know if Dibol uses it. I do know that the RSTS kernel does for memcpy. paul

12 years, 4 months

pdp-11/83-84

by Paul_Koning＠Dell.com

On Jul 5, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: ... Oh, and I saw some additional discussions about the CIS option for the F11. Unless I remember wrong, and understood things wrong, it is not just a simple PROM. It's a coprocessor, which have logic in addition to whatever microcode the coprocessor need. So no way of just duplicating a PROM to get a CIS. Not unless someone could dig up the details. If it *is* just a PROM, even if it's an oddball bipolar model with different interface specs, it should be easy to reproduce that with a small FPGA. Any reasonable modern FPGA is way faster than a 1980s era bipolar ROM, so modeling the interface timing should be easy. And level conversions should be doable. paul

12 years, 4 months

pdp-11/83-84

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2012-07-06 01:42, Boyanich, Alastair wrote: Oh, and I saw some additional discussions about the CIS option for the F11. Unless I remember wrong, and understood things wrong, it is not just a simple PROM. It's a coprocessor, which have logic in addition to whatever microcode the coprocessor need. So no way of just duplicating a PROM to get a CIS. Ah ha! Game over then. Pity. Shall have to keep poking about for bits for the 23Plus then :) Yeah. Well, had it been that easy, the market would have been flooded with CIS options. :-) Johnny

12 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet July 2012