On 06/07/2012 02:14 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Can you talk to sol::
I can't seem to get to it from my Linux desktop machine, no, but I can
SET HOST to it from my Alpha running VMS. (which I'm reaching from the
aforementioned Linux machine!)
It seems that off-net DECnet routing isn't happening from the Linux
machine..? What's up with this, does anyone know?
(and...an SC-40, VERY VERY nice!!)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I don't know of any .au on HECnet, so that would be cool... Let me know when you want to work on this, and I'll try to help from my end.
Johnny
On 2012-06-07 03:53, Boyanich, Alastair wrote:
Johnny,
Sounds fun. Do you have any other systems down here in .au ? If not and
you have some spare time this weekend, I'd love a bit of a hand getting
initially one of my systems online. We have a 3 day weekend/long weekend
so I'll have more time. I'll try building the newer version of the
bridge.c on the SGI, but the old one appears to function. Ports are all
still setup as per instructions.
Al.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2012 9:01 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] Size of HECnet
Just some fun details...
As of today, there are 321 nodes in the nodename database.
They are spread out over 16 areas.
We have machines located on (at least) three continents, if I remember
right.
While not online all the time, I think we currently have atleast the
following OSes represented:
RSX
RSTS/E
VMS
Ultrix
Linux
OSF/1
TOPS-10
Tops-20
Windows XP
IOS
If you know of any errors in this information, more fun facts, or
anything else you'd like to share, feel free to do so.
Johnny
On 06/06/2012 08:51 PM, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
By the way, as a warning... I seem to remember that DECnet support
now have been dropped from Linux. So it might not be in there
anymore, if you look at recent versions.
I've also had less than stellar results from trying to talk from
Linux to RSX. So it might not work absolutely right under all
conditions. Developers mostly (it not only) had VMS machines to
test against...
It's been some years ago, but I did a bunch of work to make it talk
well with RSTS/E. And I thought others had done the RSX work.
What work was this? Right now file transfers are mostly
non-functional with RSTS/E...transfers complete successfully, but line
terminators are completely hosed, and no combination of command line
switches will make them work properly.
Incidentally, I can use Linux DECnet support to get files over to a
VMS system, then copy them from THAT to RSTS/E via DECnet, and things
seem ok. (at least I think that worked, the last time I tried it)
I remember the rumor that it was dropped. Too bad. But there's no
reason the older version couldn't be used, unless your chosen
platform requires a later one.
Having to keep another instance of Linux around just to "hop through"
is certainly doable, but kind of a pain. :-(
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I'll look into it more tomorrow but I think it's similar to doing L3 on the 3560 or 4500/6500. Its L3 is limited to IP and it can't do tunnels, etc.
I'll verify and report back.
-brian
On Jun 6, 2012, at 22:31, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 06/06/2012 10:11 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
This isn't the thread for it, I realize.... the product slick states
that the switch does BGP, HSRP, OSPF, VRRP, etc.. again, not my area of
expertise... is this still considered a switch?
Hmm, it may actually be ok then. I've not worked with any of the 49xx
series. Supporting those dynamic routing protocols certainly suggests
that it knows how to route! ;)
Hey Brian, have you ever worked with those hybrid router/switch boxen?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 06/06/2012 10:11 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
This isn't the thread for it, I realize.... the product slick states
that the switch does BGP, HSRP, OSPF, VRRP, etc.. again, not my area of
expertise... is this still considered a switch?
Hmm, it may actually be ok then. I've not worked with any of the 49xx
series. Supporting those dynamic routing protocols certainly suggests
that it knows how to route! ;)
Hey Brian, have you ever worked with those hybrid router/switch boxen?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
This isn't the thread for it, I realize.... the product slick states that the switch does BGP, HSRP, OSPF, VRRP, etc.. again, not my area of expertise... is this still considered a switch?
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Joe Ferraro <jferraro at gmail.com> wrote:
Ah... I was told it was a "layer 4" switch, so I assumed it did some routing and something at layer 4 (firewall?!?!)... not familiar with the term, frankly...
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 06/06/2012 09:59 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
> Most any Cisco router will do the trick, but the oldest you'd probably
> want to use for something like this would be a 2500 series. They can be
> had all day long for $10-20/ea, they pull very little power, and their
> software is...erm, "available" if you know what I mean.
>
> Just picked up a Catalyst 4948 (probably a bit overkill, but it was
> free)... not sure if I have the correct licenses... in any case, if
> anyone has a quick bit on setting this up, I, for one, would be
> interested...
Um...that's a switch, not a router. I'm almost positive this model
runs IOS, but as far as I'm aware it has no routing capabilities.
But either way, free is good. :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Ah... I was told it was a "layer 4" switch, so I assumed it did some routing and something at layer 4 (firewall?!?!)... not familiar with the term, frankly...
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 06/06/2012 09:59 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
> Most any Cisco router will do the trick, but the oldest you'd probably
> want to use for something like this would be a 2500 series. They can be
> had all day long for $10-20/ea, they pull very little power, and their
> software is...erm, "available" if you know what I mean.
>
> Just picked up a Catalyst 4948 (probably a bit overkill, but it was
> free)... not sure if I have the correct licenses... in any case, if
> anyone has a quick bit on setting this up, I, for one, would be
> interested...
Um...that's a switch, not a router. I'm almost positive this model
runs IOS, but as far as I'm aware it has no routing capabilities.
But either way, free is good. :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
I've got a Windows NT 4.0 VM up occasionally too..
Sampsa
boy that gives me bad memories of long days ... perhaps you should've gone for NT 3.50 while you were at it... I do have a Win 3.11 box running... perhaps there's a decnet stack for it?!!?
On 06/06/2012 09:59 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
Most any Cisco router will do the trick, but the oldest you'd probably
want to use for something like this would be a 2500 series. They can be
had all day long for $10-20/ea, they pull very little power, and their
software is...erm, "available" if you know what I mean.
Just picked up a Catalyst 4948 (probably a bit overkill, but it was
free)... not sure if I have the correct licenses... in any case, if
anyone has a quick bit on setting this up, I, for one, would be
interested...
Um...that's a switch, not a router. I'm almost positive this model
runs IOS, but as far as I'm aware it has no routing capabilities.
But either way, free is good. :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Most any Cisco router will do the trick, but the oldest you'd probably
want to use for something like this would be a 2500 series. They can be
had all day long for $10-20/ea, they pull very little power, and their
software is...erm, "available" if you know what I mean.
Just picked up a Catalyst 4948 (probably a bit overkill, but it was free)... not sure if I have the correct licenses... in any case, if anyone has a quick bit on setting this up, I, for one, would be interested...