On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Brian Hechinger
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 20:56
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
1 - Area 52 (RIFTER 52.2 Level-II (AREA) router) (and currently only
machine here so far)
2 - 2 tunnels
3 - bart.4amlunch.net (216.15.64.181)
4 - tunnel circuits
tcp-0-19 - SG1:: 69.21.253.230
tcp-0-33 - FRUGAL:: 72.240.216.74
On 12/28/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Davidson wrote:
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
I would also like to offer up RIFTER if needed. The caveat there is that until I get new batteries for my one UPS the host that RIFTER runs on can be unstable due to power blips. Not that they happen often.
I hope to get SUN up and running sometime soon as well as that has better overall internet connectivity as well as UPS/generator backup as it's in a proper datacenter.
If it matters, connectivity is as follows:
Home - 60mbit down, 6mbit up, static IP
Colo - 100mbit down, 100mbit up, static IP
-brian
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
The problem with area 4 is that it is missing Multinet since the change
from BUBBLE:: to SLAVE::. It is on my todo list to fix.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also connected
to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines that aren't
connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the map
somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then the
map could be updated "automatically".
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1: Area 33
2: Multinet tunnel(s)
3: thrifty.misernet.net (resolves to 72.240.216.74 currently)
4:
TCP-0-19 Area 19 69.21.253.230
TCP-0-52 Area 52 216.15.64.181
TCP-8-0 Area 8 188.220.63.6
Based on what I saw with Steve's email it almost looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case. Either that or I need to donate a battery to Steve's UPS's ... ;)
Fred
Thanks,Rok. Here's the updated map
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Rok
Vidmar
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 13:11
Aan: hecnet at update.uu.se
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP
stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1 - 3
2 - Multinet tunnel
3 - 193.2.191.211 (NUK1C), 193.2.191.212 (RVDSXL)
4 - 188.220.63.6 (GORVAX), 69.21.253.230 (SG1)
--
Regards, Rok
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1 - 3
2 - Multinet tunnel
3 - 193.2.191.211 (NUK1C), 193.2.191.212 (RVDSXL)
4 - 188.220.63.6 (GORVAX), 69.21.253.230 (SG1)
--
Regards, Rok
