On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:41:14PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote: Speaking of which, Update runs its own DNS servers, web servers, and just about anything else as well. And we don't have any bandwidth limitations, and we have a pretty high bandwidth in general (maybe more than most places). I just don't personally care much about fixing web pages. While I certainly can manage DNS records, I'm so old school that I keep them in static files for bind to use. And I haven't checked what Update is running now, so I don't know how much of that I could do. But there are a few other Updaters around here as well, who might chime in. I'm in a similar situation. My colo box is MY hardware (sorry, it runs Solaris, not VMS) and I have no restrictions on the bandwidth other than "don't be an ass". 100Mbit. The current server is a POS but the there has been a replacement server delivered that should be going in at some point. I can host web content, but I, like you, don't care to be mucking about with web pages (although I will if needed to). I'm not opposed to dynamic DNS and/or DB backed DNS (which i might be setting up soon anyway) if people want to be able to manage their own DNS for any domains that I might host. I can also be a slave to any domains for anyone who needs. But on the other hand, I don't mind other people taking initiatives, and making stuff happen either. It's nice, isn't it? Get them all interested and then make THEM do the work. :) Just giving you all some more options. :-) +1 -brian -- "Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)