On 2013-04-08 18:13, Clem Cole wrote:
I'm scratching very stale memory bits here, but Ultrix for the Vax/750
circa 1982/83 might have had a MOP server that did not need a full
DECnet install. We did not run DEC-Net at one of my jobs because we
had TCP/IP which did everything DECNet could do and worked across
vendors. But I thought had a couple of LAT devices to support some
dial-up modems and a funky DEC printer that after it booted, spoke TCP
fine, but used MOP to boot. I was not involved with configuration or
maintaining any of it, so none of the details ever stuck and lend
together in my mind. But I would think you look at Ultrix around that
time you might find something.
Ultrix definitely got a mop server at some point. If it was around in 1982/83 is something
I can't comment much on, however...
The flag day for TCP/IP was 1 Jan 1983, so I wouldn't expect you were running much
TCP/IP before that point. (Yes, I know experiments and development was going on, but the
number of implementations were few, still had issues, and was very much work still in
progress.)
NCP maybe?
I know we had a 3Com terminal server that was a piece of work, but we
ran the UUCP link of the Vax for a long time and the modems I thought
were on a LAT. I just don't remember.
My memories of LAT were that it was it's own protocol in the ethernet
sense (i.e. had it's own packet type IIRC I want to say 6003) which was
different from what DECnet used. It was a very low overhead protocol,
very MIT Chaos-Net like, and much more efficient for terminals and other
low speed devices than TCP.
Correct. LAT is a protocol on ethernet. 0x6004 in fact. 0x6003 is actually DECnet.
LAT is rather efficient, but it don't have any routing capability.
Johnny
Clem
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Bob Armstrong <bob at
jfcl.com
<mailto:bob at jfcl.com>> wrote:
LAT is _NOT_ part of DECnet. LAT can be run without
DECnet installed
or running. IIRC, LAT was licensed with VMS.
Yeah, but most (actually, "all" I think) of the DECservers
required MOP to
download them. How did you do that without DECnet?
Or was it just an unwritten catch-22 that you had to have a
DECnet node
somewhere to boot up your terminal server, even if it wasn't the
node you
actually wanted to connect to ?
Bob
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic
trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
B. Idol