Could you elaborate on this?? I was unaware of any such competition
(which, of course, means absolutely nothing).? I had been looking at the
new 8 GB Raspberry PI model, which I believe would be a better fit for
installations that aggressively leverage extended mode (a number of my
rewrites do).? It would also run a possible extended-extended KLH (+22
bits) that I have been investigating.
What is it about the Pi (or the OS running on it) that precludes KLH10??
I have KLH10 running on an old version of CentOS (6.4) in a 32 bit
compile.? I also have it running on Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS in a 64 bit
compile.? I had to do some tweaking to get it the build nicely (I.E., to
eliminate a lot of compiler whining).
I have been working PANDA for a very long time; MRC took all of my
patches while he was alive, but obviously that isn't happening any more.
A few things off the top of my head.? DECnet won't work very well out of
the box for a number of reasons, and depending on the speed of the Pi
SSD, a bug can get tickled that will hang Tops-20.? The directions for
setting up DECnet under HECnet need to get written.? For example, as far
as I am aware, no Tops-20 hosts except mine are doing regular host
updates.? The DECnet version of SMTP is broken.? Multi-forking FAL is
not debuggable.? Anonymous FAL is access not supported.
DECnet itself won't work because osdnet.c doesn't set some things
properly (like AllMulti), but there are other problems as well.
It /really/ makes your life easier to have a separate Ethernet adapter
dedicated to KLH10.? DECnet would be possible, but difficult without it,
but other things are easier, too.? I did a shared adapter for a month or
so back in 2002 and got a 2nd adapter shortly afterwards.? That was
years before I had even heard of HECnet.
On 4/21/21 2:17 PM, Keith Halewood wrote:
I?m not trying to jinx it, but there?s a competition
I?ve started which is effectively get KLh10 running on a raspberry pi, panda tops-20 and
first to get it so that I can run an MDL program on it wins... or something.
> On 21 Apr 2021, at 19:14, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
>
> ?On 4/21/21 2:12 PM, Keith Halewood wrote:
>> With what was going on about RT11, I showed a much younger colleague some of the
conversations on this list.
>>
>> Let?s just say that I fear for the future of the human race.
> I share your concern. Why don't you try to get him interested in the
> vintage stuff? At LSSM, we've found that a great many of the younger
> folks actually do get interested, when they take the time to see just
> how cool things used to be...which usually translates to "when someone
> like us takes the time to show them".
>
> We've also found that many younger folk appreciate the elegant
> simplicity (relatively speaking) of vintage systems.
>
> -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA