On 2013-01-10 04:44, Dave McGuire wrote: On 01/09/2013 10:40 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *2 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *3 14 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *4 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *5 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *6 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *7 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *8 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *9 10 1 Tunnel6 -> 9.1023 38 64 A+ *11 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *12 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *18 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *19 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *20 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *28 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *33 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *42 10 1 Tunnel4 -> 42.1023 35 64 A+ *44 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *47 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *51 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *52 10 1 Tunnel1 -> 52.1 37 64 A+ *59 10 1 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 41 64 A+ Can you get any kind of statistics show how many packets are being routed, and possibly over which tunnels? Or atleast how many packets are sent/received on each tunnel? Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? That's a damn good question. I also notice that you don't seem to have an area 61 yourself here, Dave. That might explain why Cory don't get one. But the setup looks weird because of this. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol