John Floren wrote:
On 3/30/08, Bob Armstrong <bob at jfcl.com> wrote:
Wouldn't it be best to have someone geographically closer for reasons of latency?
I don't think it really matters much anymore and besides, it's not as if HECnet
is a high bandwidth application :-)
I'll be using Johnny's tunnel program.
Then I think you're going to have to connect to his server, regardless of
geography.
Ok, then I guess I may end up using one of Johnny's machines after all.
I don't have a big problem with that. It's just a latency issue (as you noted
elsewhere).
open ports on the LAN, something I can't easily
do.
AFAIK, you'll have to open ports in either case. Multinet uses UDP port 700; I
don't know about Johnny's program.
If it's an outbound port, there's no problem; we're talking about your
typical Linksys wireless router sitting on a cable modem. If I need to
open an inbound port, which wouldn't surprise me, I'll talk to the
landlady... she'll probably approve, she knows I work in computing and
for some reason that makes people assume I know what I'm doing ;)
:-)
Yes, you need to open up, and forward packets to/from a specific UDP port through your
firewall. Not that magical...
LOKI:: Alphastation 250 4/266 running OpenVMS 8.3
FAFNIR:: VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS 7.3
Do you already have TCP/IP on either of these machines? What/which one are you using?
I have UCX on both of them; I use LOKI by far the most.
Quick question--LOKI already has DECnet-Plus installed, that will work
for HECnet, right? As I understand it, DECnet-Plus is backwards
compatible with Phase IV?
It should work fine. I have backed down to plain DECnet on my VMS machines, since DECnet+
just confuse me anyway. Plain DECnet just seems easier to work with. :-)
Johnny