Johnny, I'll have to look up which documentation - I do not have it in front of me at the moment. I personally use my own area to deal with this because I am way past having to need the documents. I have written a DCL procedure that does IP address lookups at predetermined (configurable) intervals. If it finds a mismatched IP address it reconfigures the the TCP-0-n (where "n" is the area - in my case) IP address and schedules a reboot. It takes SG1:: ~3 minutes to come back. I had to do this because Multinet (like the bridge) does not support dynamic addressing. Area 33 is running with a dynamic-DNS address. It just works and has for well over a year. It also sends email to those who need to know that a change in address has occurred. This can help Sampsa and Bob (two other connections that MISER::FRED has) to notify them that they must reconfigure the entry for area 33. Initially we used it to give MISER::FRED information to take to his ISP that would detail just how often he would have to deal with new addresses. Fred could probably provide more info on this. The email also contains a report that provides some details that could be useful. It has sure helped Fred and myself deal with "dynamic" changes! :-) -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 10:11 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Multinet Tunnel Links defined On 2011-12-22 04:04, Steve Davidson wrote: Two things: First I would like to continue to reserve area 13. All the documentation about DECserver management refers to it. Could you point me to some of that documentation? I've not seen any of it, and I don't really at all understand the point of even setting up information in the nodename database for DECservers, which don't even speak DECnet to begin with. (And I do have DECservers up and running, as well as manuals...) I know that, from a convenience point of view, you can use the name as a short cut for specifying the MAC address and circuit, but having an area reserved for such a simple detail seems excessive. Second SG1 is a VS4000/30 (VLC). It is small, quiet, and cheap to run - all very important features. If I remember correctly, LEGATO is the same platform for the exact purpose. The only difference between my Multnet "gateway" is that it can accommodate dynamic-DNS at the other end. Cool. I guess that platform should be enough to handle normal HECnet traffic even if we grow some more. How do you deal with dynamic IP addresses? PS One more network is in the wings. You should be getting email about it soon enough if you have not already. Nothing yet. Johnny -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:58 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Multinet Tunnel Links defined Current list as of right now: .ncp sho act are Active areas summary as of 22-DEC-11 03:53:33 Next Area State Circuit Node 1 Reachable 1.13 (MIM) 2 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 3 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 4 Reachable UNA-0 4.249 (SLAVE) 6 Reachable UNA-0 6.1 (STAR69) 8 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 11 Reachable UNA-0 11.2 (MAISA) 19 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 20 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 33 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 42 Reachable UNA-0 42.1 (CANADA) 44 Reachable UNA-0 44.21 (NIKKEL) 54 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 59 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) . That is 14 areas, and I'm talking to one more guy who wants a new area, which would bring us to 15. Anyone object to me giving him area 13? It was asked to be reserved for DECserver management, but I don't really see the point of having an area for that purpose. But if you can convince me... :-) Also, SG1:: is quite a hub from the bridge point of view. Lots of connections coming through there. Nice. :-) What type of machine is it? Johnny On 2011-12-21 18:29, Steve Davidson wrote: At the moment 13 areas are up and running - this list only show 10. Hopefully sometime today we will be at 14. We're working on it! :-) -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 5:44 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Multinet Tunnel Links defined On 2011-12-20 22:34, Steve Davidson wrote: I have defined (or redefined) tunnels for areas 3 and 6 for both GORVAX:: and SG1::. These are effective immediately. Enjoy! Cool. Area 3 is up according to MIM. Pretty... .ncp sho act are Active areas summary as of 20-DEC-11 23:42:41 Next Area State Circuit Node 1 Reachable 1.13 (MIM) 3 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 4 Reachable UNA-0 4.249 (SLAVE) 6 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 8 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 11 Reachable UNA-0 11.2 (MAISA) 19 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 20 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 33 Reachable UNA-0 19.41 (SG1) 42 Reachable UNA-0 42.1 (CANADA) . Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol