On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, John Wilson wrote: From: Clem Cole <clemc at ccc.com> Much as as I like *BSD, I'd rather see OSx ;-) Even if I weren't afraid of Apple because of their "app store" monopolistic grabbiness (they used to be so nice in the old days), I wasn't able to find a reasonable way to get Mach-O executables from OMF-386 .OBJ files. Writing a new linker seems like a great way not to have fun! Yup. It's not a way to have fun. ;) On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Steve Davidson <jeep at scshome.net> wrote: Then how about NetBSD on x86??? I really would like to attack the *BSDs ... I investigate periodically but I just can't decide which I'd regret more: conditionalizing the hell out of 11K lines of Linux-specific support code, or editing a copy into ~11K lines of BSD-specific code that's easy reading but needs to be maintained in parallel. Um, or I could do both? Nah. It would be fun to get working though. How linux-specific? The linuxulator compat layer emulates some syscalls...except not raw libpcap...I've not quite managed to figure that out. I was trying klh10 though. John Wilson D Bit -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects