I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all, that's only for the X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com, though I may run a local node additionally). For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned Johnny-bridge. :) I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.? On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote: Unfortunately Mark has some severe bandwidth limitations which are making this link unusably slow. Bearing in mind that I'm located in California, is there anyone who can be my bridge peer who has reasonable bandwidth? I honestly don't need much, just something that "works". If you're doing virtual cisco, do you speak IPv6? If you do I can you a semi-stable link. My IP is dynamic but my scripts should restore connectivity within 65 seconds. The longest wait would be for Brian H.'s scripts. -Mark On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Jovan Trujillo <jovan.trujillo2 at gmail.com> wrote: I would like an account if you open up telnet. Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote: False alarm. Sampsa's bridge was apparently broken. I peered with Mark Wickens and my adjacency came right up. Good to go. Would anyone like an account on my TOPS-20 system? It's at 4.1022, node name GLGMSH. It's also reachable via LAT. I may consider opening it up via telnet as well. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:06 AM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com> wrote: I d suggest firing up wireshark or equivalent to capture the DECnet traffic. See what it shows. Wireshark has some DECnet packet annotation (though some of it is badly broken route packets are not parsed right). Look for packets from the neighbor routers you re expecting to see. And look at the hello packets from both sides and match them against what the DECnet routing spec says should happen. If necessary, post a few lines from the result and we can look it over. paul On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote: I'm only ever seeing LAT and MOP packets coming over the bridge; my DECnet 0x6003 packets get silently ignored, and I never see any coming from the far end of the bridge. Is anyone willing to bridge with me as a test for comparison? I don't yet have an area assigned by Johnny since I only have one machine at present (but that may change), so I've been using the same area number as the remote bridge peer. -Mark On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote: OK, I'm at the hair-tearing-out stage... Who here has a TOPS-20 system connected to HECnet? I'm trying to peer with Sampsa with "bridge" in his same area as an endnode. Bridge works fine on my end, lots of activity in debug mode, and I see lots of node number entries if I send it a SIGUSR1. However I never "see" the adjacent node in NCP, though my circuit and line are up and active. Adding a few nodes manually with NCP SET NODE and then trying a SET HOST in the monitor just times out. If I do this while watching my ethernet with tcpdump, I see my real DECnet traffic, immediately followed by its encapsulated udp packet going out over port 4711. However, I never get any responses to my SET HOST from the remote bridge side. Any suggestions on debugging this? Thanks, Mark -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects