Ah Johnny that's an easy choice then :-) I'll stick to the bridge then Happy New Year! Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone. Origineel bericht Van: Johnny Billquist Verzonden: vrijdag 2 januari 2015 18:34 Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Hecnet Peering On 2015-01-02 18:28, Hans Vlems wrote: Is there an advantage if you use a tunnel in stead of Johnny's bridge program which I use? It scales better and use less network bandwidth, if that is a concern. But it won't pass through LAT or MOP. Pick your poison. :-) Johnny Hans Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone. *Van: *Tim Sneddon *Verzonden: *vrijdag 2 januari 2015 18:24 *Aan: *hecnet at update.uu.se *Beantwoorden: *hecnet at Update.UU.SE *Onderwerp: *Re: [HECnet] Hecnet Peering On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net <mailto:steve at davidson.net>> wrote: Tim, The short form... DEChubs are us. I have both the backplanes and the MultiStacks. They currently have hubs, LAT servers, and dedicated LAT printer modules. I even have the Packet Probe module with software... That should work nicely. Regards, Tim. -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol