On 2013-01-17, at 9:19 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: What's the latency like? [root at zork ~]# ping 192.168.42.1 -c 10 PING 192.168.42.1 (192.168.42.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=4.45 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=3.40 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=4.40 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3.30 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=4.46 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=2.87 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=8.04 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3.42 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=3.38 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=4.52 ms --- 192.168.42.1 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.878/4.229/8.042/1.395 ms This is at the same time as I'm saturating the 10Mbps part of the network with a local FTP of a 22Gb file that I need to move over to my Alpha machine. I am very happy. Ian