Rok, Were you able to verify that the new address works? If I test this then I will actually need one of the remote addresses to change. This is not something I wish to ask of the two sites that currently make use of dynamic-DNS. What I may do is setup one of my other machines with Multinet and then move it to another of the static addresses here to see what happens. That will take a bit more effort so it may have to wait until the weekend. Also, I can't remember if I wrote MultiWatch for V5.2, or V5.3 - it's been in use that long... This could explain the difference. I just don't remember. Maybe, Fred remembers - his site was the reason for the procedure in the first place. Fred??? -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Rok Vidmar Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 11:07 AM To: hecnet at update.uu.se Subject: Re: [HECnet] Multinet Tunnel Links defined I wonder if what I saw was VAX specific??? ... No way for me to test now. As a bonus I found out that $ multinet set/decnet/remote=new_IP_NAME/device=TCPAn:/connect work as well as $ multinet set/decnet/remote=new_IP_ADDR/device=TCPAn:/connect -- Regards, Rok